Secure with Securitisation: Global Volumes Expected to Rise in 2025

-Dayita Kanodia (finserv@vinodkothari.com)

Despite global macroeconomic challenges, including persistent inflation, securitization volumes and ratings across most structured finance asset classes demonstrated remarkable stability in FY 2024. Strong housing markets bolstered credit performance in sectors like U.S. and Australian RMBS, while European housing markets faced concerns of overvaluation. 

Overall, the performance of the securitisation market in FY 2024 was considered to be stable with a few exceptions of leveraged lending and collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) which remained in focus for numerous reasons, including their elevated exposures to lower-rated obligors.1

This article delves into the securitization trends observed in FY 2025, analyzing the market’s performance and offering insights into future projections.

Global Securitisation Volumes for FY 2025

US 

As of December 2024, the total US Structured Finance issuance reached USD 770 Billion. In this, the total RMBS issuance accounted for USD 137.9 Billion (17.9% of the total structured finance issuance). It may be noted that total RMBS issuance for FY 2023 amounted to USD 78 Billion, therefore leading to an increase of roughly 76% in the current fiscal year. Securitisation of Credit Card receivables accounted for about USD 20.6 Billion while auto loans accounted for USD 126.4 Billion.2

As per S&P Global, the total credit card ABS issuance will be about $33 billion in 2025 thus leading to a 60% increase from the previous year. It also estimates the total RMBS issuance to reach USD 160 Billion supported by home price appreciation and low unemployment rates. 

The below chart shows structured finance issuances by sub-sector:

Traditionally, US data has excluded agency-backed transactions (the data above, therefore, would mostly be non-qualifying residential mortgage loans). SIFMA data shows that agency and non-agency RMBS issuance added to USD 1.592 trillion, registering an increase of 21%. This includes an increase of 119% in non-agency RMBS, and about 19% in agency-RMBS.

Yet another segment which is typically boosted by the benign credit conditions is CMBS. US CMBS volumes touched USD 103 billion [S&P data]. This is over 2.5 X of the volume seen last year.

European Market

European securitisation issuance in 2024 reached USD 142 billion, reflecting an over 50% increase compared to 2023.While fewer outstanding transactions in the European securitisation market are anticipated to hit their call dates in 2025, typically a factor that negatively impacts volumes; improvements in underlying credit originations offer a positive outlook3.

A highlight of 2024 was the record-setting bank-originated securitisations, which soared to a 12-year high of over USD 36 billion. Additionally, sustainable-labelled securitisation rebounded strongly, with issuances exceeding USD 5 billion during the year. RMBS volumes in Europe rose by approximately 60% to USD 46 billion, a trend likely to persist into 2025.

The below chart shows the RMBS and ABS issuance over last 3 years in the European market:

China 

In China, new securitization issuances grew by 4.8% year-on-year to USD 200 billion during 1Q-3Q 2024. Issuances of consumer loan ABS and account receivables ABS saw noticeable growth and MSE loan ABS issuances surged by 76%. However, the issuance of certain major asset classes, such as auto loan ABS declined significantly (Auto loan ABS issuance fell 39% in 1Q-3Q 2024 to USD 11.83 billion. The number of transactions issued during the period dropped to 22 from 29 a year earlier).4

Consultation on Securitisation

A highpoint  of the EU securitisation market in 2024 is the consultation by the  European Commission to mend the regulatory framework for securitisation. This exercise was prompted by several positive noises about securitisation at a policy-makers’ level. Enrico Letta, former Italian Prime Minister, in his report to the EU, made a strong case for securitisation. He said: “Securitization acts as a unique link between credit and capital markets. In this sense, the securitization market offers significant potential. Increasing its utilization brings two key benefits: i) broadening and diversifying the pool of assets available for investment, and ii) unlocking banks’ balance sheet capacity to facilitate additional financing. Moreover, the adoption of green securitization, whether through securitizing green assets or directing securitization proceeds towards green financing, holds promise as a significant contributor to the transition towards sustainability. Therefore, we advocate for reforms in the European securitization framework to enhance its accessibility and effectiveness”5 In addition, comments by Noyer and those by Mario Draghi favoured changes in securitisation framework. Thus, in October, 2024, the Eurpean Commission began a targeted consultation on several aspects of securitisation market. The responses from the consultation are currently available on the Commission’s website

Surge in CLO market

One of the notable developments in 2024 was the surge in CLO volumes. US CDO/CLO issuance, as per SIFMA statistics, recorded an issuance volume of USD 85 billion, which is 195% higher than the issuance last year. European CLO volume registered a volume of Euro 46 billion, substantially higher than last year. One report, citing a BofA research, states that the global outstanding CLO volume reached nearly USD 1.2 trillion. 

The growth in the CLO market is a direct result of the activity in the leveraged loan market, as the feedstock of CLOs primarily is leveraged loans. Leveraged loans, a term that is rather understood than defined, is mostly low-rated loans to entities that are already carrying significant leverage. The US leveraged loan market adds to upwards of USD 1.2 trillion, and that in Europe stood at about Euro 280 billion. Most of these leveraged loans tend to “syndicated” or downsold in pieces to various participating banks – which may number from a dozen to even 200, and hence, reflecting the extent of lender participation, this market is called “broadly syndicated loan” or BSL market.

While private credit financiers are increasingly making inroads into the space, a lot of capital in the leveraged loan market comes from CLOs. 

Another interesting development in the US CLO market has been the growth of CLO ETFs. A report by S&P says that CLO ETFs’ AUM rose from USD 120 million in 2020 to USD 19 billion in Nov., 2024.

Regulatory updates

UK enacted the Securitisation Regulations, 2024, which replaced the earlier 2017 Regulations. Pursuant to the Regulations, the Financial Conduct Authority has framed the set of rules called Securitisation Sourcebook. The rules lay particular emphasis on the Simple, transparent and standardised (STS criteria) of securitisation transactions, and by way of amendments made later in the year, bar the domiciling of SPVs in certain high risk jurisdictions.

Growth in synthetic securitisation

Synthetic securitisation, also sometimes known as synthetic risk transfer or significant risk transfer (SRT) transactions, were mostly limited to Europe and SE Asia jurisdictions, due to lack of clarity on regulatory capital treatment in the USA. In Sept., 2023, the Federal Reserve board clarified that capital relief will be applicable in case of synthetic transactions. Since the clarification, US share in global synthetic securitisations grew to over 30%, from a small fraction earlier. The IMF Global Financial Stability Report of October, 2024 states that globally, more than $1.1 trillion in assets have been synthetically securitized since 2016, of which almost two-thirds were in Europe.

The said IMF report highlights several risks of SRT transactions. First of all, it states, basis anecdotal evidence, that banks are providing funding to credit funds for buying tranches of SRT deals of other banks, thereby implying that the risks are eventually within the banking system. It also states that SRTs may “mask banks’ degree of resilience because they may increase a bank’s regulatory capital ratio while its overall capital level remains unchanged.” Furthermore, overreliance on SRTs exposes banks to business challenges should liquidity from the SRT market dry up. Financial innovation may lead to securitization of riskier asset pools, challenging banks with less sophisticated tools for risk management, because some more complex products make the identity of the ultimate risk holder less clear. Finally, although lower capital charges at a bank level are reasonable, given the risk transfer, cross-sector regulatory arbitrage may reduce capital buffers in the broad financial system while overall risks remain largely unchanged. 

Sustainable-labelled Securitisation

The European market saw an issuance exceeding USD 5 Billion during 2024 with first time issuances in solar ABS sectors. 

In the U.S., government-sponsored enterprises are purchasing mortgage pools targeting low-carbon buildings and refinancing these assets in the mortgage-backed securities market to finance energy and water efficiency programmes6. For instance, in September 2024, Fannie Mae a GSE came up with a single family green bond framework. Under this framework, loans which conform to the eligibility requirements are acquired from lenders and are securitised into Fannie Mae MBS which are either delivered to the lenders or sold to investors. Here, only projects achieving certain environmental performance standards such as Solar Loans and water efficiency loans are eligible7

Indian Securitisation Market8 

Securitisation volumes surged about 27% on-year to Rs 1.78 lakh crore in the first nine months of FY 24-25, supported by large issuances from private sector banks. In the third quarter alone, issuances touched Rs 63,000 crore with private sector banks contributing to 28% of this (HDFC bank alone securitised new car loans by issuing PTCs valued at just over Rs 12,700 crore). However, originations by NBFCs were only up by 5%. The market also saw 15 first time NBFC issuers, bringing the total number of originators to 152, compared with 136 in the last financial year. 

Among asset classes, vehicle loans (including commercial vehicles and two-wheelers) accounted for 48% of securitisation volume (vs 40% in the corresponding period last fiscal).

Mortgage-backed loans accounted for about 23% of securitisation volume (vs 20% in the corresponding period last fiscal). 

Overall, the Indian Securitisation Market volume is expected to reach Rs 2.4 trillion by the end of FY2025. 

On the regulatory front, SEBI, in its board meeting dated December 18, 2024, approved amendments to the framework for the issuance and listing of Securitised Debt Instruments (SDIs). These amendments aim to expand the SDI market and align the regulations with the current securitisation norms prescribed for RBI-regulated entities.

This growth trajectory is expected to persist into FY26, fueled by strong securitization volumes and the expanding involvement of private sector banks. With evolving market dynamics and growing investor confidence, the securitization market is poised for sustained momentum for years to come.

Related articles: 

  1. India securitisation volumes 2024: Has co-lending taken the sheen?
  2. Indian securitisation enters a new phase: Banks originate with a bang
  3. Securitisation: Indian market grows amidst global volume contraction
  1.  https://www.spglobal.com/_assets/documents/ratings/research/101591938.pdf
    ↩︎
  2.  https://www.spglobal.com/_assets/documents/ratings/research/101610419.pdf
    ↩︎
  3.  https://www.spglobal.com/ratings/en/research/pdf-articles/easset_upload_file78691_3234527_e.pdf
    ↩︎
  4.  https://www.spglobal.com/_assets/documents/ratings/research/101607929.pdf
    ↩︎
  5.  https://www.consilium.europa.eu/media/ny3j24sm/much-more-than-a-market-report-by-enrico-letta.pdf
    ↩︎
  6.  https://www.spglobal.com/_assets/documents/ratings/research/101604403.pdf ↩︎
  7.  https://capitalmarkets.fanniemae.com/media/20626/display
    ↩︎
  8. Source – https://www.crisilratings.com/en/home/newsroom/press-releases/2025/01/securitisation-volume-up-27percent-in-nine-months-of-this-fiscal.html
    ↩︎

Securitisation Resource Centre

Securitisation is a cornerstone of modern financial markets, driving liquidity, risk distribution, and innovative funding solutions. This page consolidates all our articles on securitisation, offering insights into regulatory developments, market practices, and evolving structures.

Date of PublicationTitleAuthor/SpeakerLink
15.07.2025More Than Enough: Overcollateralisation as credit enhancement in Securitisations Vinod Kothari, Dayita Kanodia and Archisman Bhattacharjeehttps://vinodkothari.com/2025/07/more-than-enough-overcollateralisation-as-credit-enhancement-in-securitisations/
27.11.2024Securitisation of MSME receivables in IndiaVinod Kotharihttps://vinodkothari.com/2024/11/securitisation-of-msme-receivables-in-india/
07.10.2024Simple, Transparent and Comparable (STC) securitisation: Discrepancy in risk weights needing urgent remedyTeam Finservhttps://vinodkothari.com/2024/10/simple-transparent-and-comparable-stc-securitisation-discrepancy-in-risk-weights-needing-urgent-remedy/
30.09.2024Indian securitisation enters a new phase: Banks originate with a bangAbhirup Ghoshhttps://vinodkothari.com/2024/09/indian-securitisation-enters-a-new-phase-banks-originate-with-a-bang/
04.09.2024Sustainable Securitisation – the next in filling sustainable finance gap in IndiaVinod Kothari and Payal Agarwalhttps://vinodkothari.com/2024/09/sustainable-securitisation-the-next-in-filling-sustainable-finance-gap-in-india/
28.06.2024Representation for Regulatory Amendments to Promote Securitisation in IndiaTeam Finservhttps://vinodkothari.com/2024/06/representation-for-regulatory-amendments-to-promote-securitisation-in-india/
27.05.2024Vikas Path: The Securitised Path to Financial Inclusionhttps://vinodkothari.com/2024/05/vikas-path-the-securitised-path-to-financial-inclusion/
22.05.2024Key Takeaways – 12th Securitisation Summit, 2024Team Finservhttps://vinodkothari.com/2024/05/key-takeaways-12th-securitisation-summit-2024/
16.04.2024India securitisation volumes 2024: Has co-lending taken the sheen?Team Finservhttps://vinodkothari.com/2024/04/india-securitisation-volumes-2024-has-co-lending-taken-the-sheen/
04.03.2024The Promise of Predictability: Regulation and Taxation of Future Flow SecuritizationDayita Kanodiahttps://vinodkothari.com/2024/03/the-promise-of-predictability-regulation-and-taxation-of-future-flow-securitization/
26.02.2024Securing the Beat: Tuning into Music Royalty SecuritizationDayita Kanodiahttps://vinodkothari.com/2024/02/securing-the-beat-tuning-into-music-royalty-securitization/
26.02.2024Securing the Beat: Tuning into Music Royalty SecuritizationDayita Kanodiahttps://vinodkothari.com/2024/02/securing-the-beat-tuning-into-music-royalty-securitization/
01.05.2023Security Interest: Meaning, forms, registration, enforcement, and effects of non-registrationTeam vinod Kothari and Companyhttps://vinodkothari.com/2023/05/security-interest-meaning-forms-registration-enforcement-and-effects-ofnon-registration/
17.04.2023Taxation in Securitisation: A judicial overviewAnirudh Groverhttps://vinodkothari.com/2023/04/taxation-in-securitisation-a-judicial-overview/
13.04.2023Securitisation: Indian market grows amidst global volume contractionTimothy Lopeshttps://vinodkothari.com/2023/04/securitisation-indian-market-grows-amidst-global-volume-contraction/
31.01.2023Securitisation of stressed loans: Opportunities and structuresTimothy Lopeshttps://vinodkothari.com/2023/01/securitisation-of-stressed-loans-opportunities-and-structures/

Full Day Workshop on Securitisation,Transfer of Loans and Co-lending

Seats Full, Registration Closed.

However, don’t worry we are announcing a repeat workshop on 21st May, 2025

Register here for the Repeat Workshop: https://forms.gle/TGQBkVXgzX8Ho5ts8

Limited Time Offer!!

Get two of our premium books worth ₹7,500 for just ₹3,000 when you register to attend the Workshop Avail the offer benefit now!

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [336.44 KB]

Our resources on new Securitisation and Transfer of Loan Directions

Full Day Workshop on Securitisation,Transfer of Loans and Co-lending

Register here:
https://forms.gle/kbjwwAmayAWKJwZr5

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [616.58 KB]

Our resources on new Securitisation and Transfer of Loan Directions

Securitisation of MSME receivables in India

Vinod Kothari l finserv@vinodkothari.com

  1. Financing needs of MSMEs in India: Working capital constitutes a major part of SMEs’ funding requirements

There are considerable gaps in funding for SMEs: In India, the total addressable demand for external credit is estimated to be USD 173 billion[1] while the overall supply of finance from formal sources is estimated to be USD 441 trillion. The Expert Committee on Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises, constituted by Reserve Bank of India in December, 2018 has estimated the overall gap in India to be USD 238 – 298 billion[2].  

Read more: Securitisation of MSME receivables in India

Traditional sources of funding are working capital facilities with banks; however, given their unorganised nature, lack of formal financial statements, etc., many SMEs find it difficult to have formal lines of credit from banks.

The marketplace is trying alternative sources of working capital for SME. The avenues tried based on the different components of the working capital:
Accounts receivablesInventory
Trade Receivables Discounting System (TREDS) Factoring/ supply chain financingCredit period for accounts payable, funded by way of reverse factoring/ supply chain financing
  1. Trade Receivables Discounting System (TReDS/TREDS)

TREDS is almost India’s own innovation, though it was inspired by Mexico’s NAFIN Cadenas Productivas Program. TREDS as a mechanism for discounting and unitisation of trade receivables was launched in 2014. Currently, there are 4 of them – RXIL, M3, InvoiceMart and C2FO Factoring Solutions Private Limited. The first one is the largest.

Limited number of funding participants. However, given that there are quite a limited number of funding participants in the TREDS ecosystem currently (as informed by some of the participants in the TREDS platform(s), only 5-6 banks are currently actively bidding), there is very little competitive bidding for invoices currently. The cost of funding, we were given to understand, is about 0.25% – 0.40%  higher than bank finance, if the buyer happens to be a BBB rated entity.

Figure: Trend in TREDS over 3 years[3]

  1. Supply chain financing

Supply chain financing is growing, as present-day trade needs to move fast; working capital availability is key to achieving turnover with low spreads, to service the ultimate consumer affordably and efficiently.  Supply chain finance is a key mode of financing for upstream procurements as well as downstream supplies by an entity with a good credit standing, say Anchor. Usually, the financing is done by setting a limit based on the Anchor’s credit standing, with a bank or NBFC. Both banks and NBFCs are active in the space. Financing may be done by discounting of supply bills, either accepted by the Anchor as due for payment, or drawn by the Anchor on the dealers/ customers of the Anchor.

Most supply chain financing programs work on first loss guarantee by the Anchor. For the downstream supplies, Anchor usually has to provide a first loss guarantee support, to the extent of 5% to 10% of the pool of receivables funded by a lender under the facility.

  1. Factoring

Factoring law, intended to encourage factoring, has not lived to its purpose due to regulatory overtone. The Factoring Regulation Act was enacted to facilitate and encourage factoring; however, its regulatory stance has served to stifle factoring. Only a handful of NBFCs are currently registered as factors, while banks are not required to register[4]. As a result, the volume of factoring in India is trivial, as compared to global jurisdictions.

  1. Potential for securitisation of SME receivables

Direct securitisation by SMEs is not feasible. There are 2 ways in which securitisation of MSME receivables can take place: securitisation of trade receivables by SME itself; and secondly, receivables are funded by intermediaries (banks, NBFCs), aggregated by intermediaries, and securitised by them.

Securitisation by SMEs directly is not feasible, as volumes are not sufficient. Plus, it requires direct access to investors, which is unviable. Hence, the discussion below focuses on securitisation of receivables funded by intermediaries.

Intermediated securitisation is the way the world does it. However, regulations in India have scuttled the possibility. Acquisition of receivables by intermediaries (either on their balance sheet, or in the balance sheets of trade finance conduits) is quite common world-over[5]. However, this activity has not picked up in India, for several reasons:

  • There is a bar on securitisation of revolving credit facilities in the RBI SSA Directions. Naturally, a trade receivable funding program has to be structured as a revolving facility, to allow the SME continued and assured access to working capital. Issuance of asset backed commercial paper is also barred under the same Directions.
  • Regulated financial lenders cannot do a securitisation transaction outside of SSA Directions. If unregulated entities (not regulated by the RBI, say, a conduit vehicle) does a securitisation outside of SSA Directions, no regulated lender can invest in such a transaction, as any investment so made will be a full charge against regulatory capital.

As a result, securitisation of trade receivables is currently a near impossibility under the regulatory regime.

Will trade receivables securitisation help?

Table below compares securitisation with TREDS, supply chain financing and securitisation:

 TREDSSupply Chain FinancingSecuritisation
Consistent availability of fundingWhile the funding limits are established based on the rating and credit of the buyer, the funding happens on invoice-by-invoice basis. There is no assurance as to either availability or the cost of fundingAs limits are assigned for each vendor/ dealer, there is an assured availability at a pre-agreed cost of fundingAs limits are assigned for each vendor/ dealer, there is an assured availability at a pre-agreed cost of funding by the intermediary, who, in turn may take receivables to capital markets
DisintermediationInvolves financial intermediariesInvolves financial intermediariesInvolves intermediaries at the inception, but eventually, the intermediaries offload the receivables to capital market
Burden on banks’ balance sheetsReceivables are on the balance sheet of the lenderReceivables are on the balance sheet of the lenderReceivables are off the balance sheet for regulatory capital purposes
PricingWhile pricing is primarily done on the strength of the Anchor, at times, SME gets good pricing based on the liquidity in the banking systemPricing is done based on the FLDG support provided by the Anchor; hence, priced based on achor’s credit ratingAvailability of capital market access, coupled with credit enhancements may bring down the cost of funding

Policymakers need to enable alternative instruments, and leave the choice to the marketplace. The Table above makes a case for securitisation of trade receivables. Such securitisation does not conflict with TREDS; TREDS may continue as an option, leaving the choice to SMEs /lenders the benefit of choice.

Role of credit enhancements in trade receivables securitisation

The potential structure of securitisation of trade receivables, as it commonly works in global jurisdictions, is as follows:

Figure: Structure of Trade Receivable Securitisation

In essence, there are two levels of credit support – one, at the level of each SME (seller), which sells receivables to the Intermediary/conduit. This is typically by way of over-collateralisation or a first loss facility.

Having thus acquired credit enhanced receivables from the SMEs, the intermediary arranges a program-wide credit enhancement. This enhancement essentially becomes a mezzanine support.

The entire program works as a revolving facility, such that the SME sellers continue to sell receivables on an ongoing basis. On the other hand, the securised paper has a fixed maturity, subject to roll-over at the discretion of the paper holders. Hence, there needs to be liquidity support provided to the conduit, typically by a bank.

Providers of credit enhancement:

  • SIDBI, as credit enhancer for SME funding, may provide the program credit support.
  • SIDBI, in turn, may be counter-guaranteed by MDBs

Policy/regulatory changes required:

The bar on securitisation of revolving credit facilities, introduced looking at the experience during GFC, needs to be withdrawn. There is an inherent liquidity risk on the part of the intermediary that does securitisation (the risk that early amortisation triggers may cause the facility to wind down, while the committed funding still will have to be continued by the intermediary), but this may be addressed by appropriate capital charge. Note that there is no bar on revolving credit securitisation either in the EU Capital Directions, or in Basel Securitisation Framework.

Likewise, the bar on issuance of asset backed commercial paper needs to be removed. The provider of liquidity facility needs an appropriate capital charge for the maximum value of the facility.


[1]https://www.ifc.org/content/dam/ifc/doc/mgrt/financing-india-s-msmes-estimation-of-debt-requirement-of-msmes-in-india.pdf

[2]https://dcmsme.gov.in/Report%20of%20Expert%20Committee%20on%20MSMEs%20-%20The%20U%20K%20Sinha%20Committee%20constitutes%20by%20RBI.pdf

[3] Source: RBI Statistics on TREDS: https://www.rbi.org.in/Scripts/TREDSStatisticsView.aspx?TREDSid=8, and VKC Analysis

[4] See blog by Vinod Kothari: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/factoring-india-fractured-opportunity-vinod-kothari/

[5]https://www.euromoney.com/article/2cs68xnhl90cxtg3n64n4/treasury/trade-receivables-deals-buck-broader-market-slump


Read our other articles:

  1. Simple, Transparent and Comparable (STC) securitisation: Discrepancy in risk weights needing urgent remedy
  2. Indian securitisation enters a new phase: Banks originate with a bang
  3. Sustainable Securitisation – the next in filling sustainable finance gap in India

Simple, Transparent and Comparable (STC) securitisation: Discrepancy in risk weights needing urgent remedy

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [324.74 KB]


Our resources on Securitisation:

  1. What is securitisation?
  2. Basel III requirements for Simple Transparent and Comparable (STC) Securitisation
  3. IOSCO Paper on Simple, Transparent and Comparable (STC) securitization
  4. Time value of money, NPVs, IRRs

Indian securitisation enters a new phase: Banks originate with a bang

Abhirup Ghosh | abhirup@vinodkothari.com

The Indian securitisation market has been without banks as originators for nearly 17 years, until HDFC Bank[1] launched a landmark transaction that may signal their potential return. Prior to the Global Financial Crisis, which raised significant questions about the viability of securitization as a financial product, banks like ICICI Bank were actively involved in the market, with ICICI’s last reported transaction occurring in 2007[2].

It is notable that erstwhile HDFC Limited, prior to its merger into the Bank, was the largest single originator of home loan securitisations; however, the present transaction is not home loans.

After the GFC, banks shifted from being originators to becoming investors in securitised assets. To meet the priority sector lending targets, banks started investing heavily in the securitisation market, be it in pass-through certificates or through acquisition of loan pools. This was a stark contrast to the situation elsewhere in the world, where the issuances are primarily made by banks.

Read more

Workshop on Co-lending and Loan Partnering

For registration click here: https://forms.gle/bq18tHgQb618jAcb9

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [334.23 KB]

Sustainable Securitisation – the next in filling sustainable finance gap in India

– Vinod Kothari and Payal Agarwal | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

A recent UNCTAD Report[1] highlights the financing gap in sustainable development – citing the need for around $4 trillion additional investment annually for developing countries. India is no exception, in fact, various studies[2] suggest the high sustainable finance gap in the country. As the need for sustainable finance continues to grow, so does the regulator’s vigilance towards providing a definite regulatory framework around the same. In this context, SEBI has released a Consultation Paper on expanding the scope of Sustainable Finance framework in the Indian securities market[3].

The Consultation Paper proposes to expand the current regulatory framework around green debt securities[4], by including other forms of sustainable or thematic bonds[5]; to be covered by a broader expression “ESG Debt Securities”. The Paper also proposes to introduce a framework for Sustainable Securitised Debt Instruments (SDIs). In this write-up, we briefly discuss the concept of green and sustainable securitisation, and give our recommendations for the suggested framework for Green and Sustainable Securitisation in India.

Read more

Representation for Regulatory Amendments to Promote Securitisation in India 

Team Finserv | finserv@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [404.07 KB]