Posts

The triumphs and tribulations of being a promoter in listed entities

– Team Corplaw | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Introduction

The classic rule of Solomon, that the shareholders are different and the company that they promote is different, and that the liabilities of the company cannot be passed over to the shareholders, seems to be getting constantly indented, particularly as courts and regulators realize that companies are inanimate; it is the controlling heads who actually run companies. Therefore, if there is a vice in the schematics of a company, it must rope in the promoters too. Securities regulator, and our own SEBI too, has been fastening several obligations of listed entities on the promoters, including the recent ‘Consultation paper on strengthening corporate governance at listed entities by empowering shareholders’ proposal to block the personal shareholdings of the promoters for continued lapses by the listed entity.

There are several other implications of being a promoter or promoter group entity, transactions by such entities with the listed entity are mandatorily treated as related party transactions, public disclosures on sale of shares. There are several sections of the Companies Act, 2013 (“Act”) as well, which impose liabilities, including criminal liabilities, on promoters. Some of these provisions are section 7 (imposing criminal liability for incorporation related offenses), of the Act, if it is found that the company has been incorporated by furnishing any false information or representation or by suppression of any material information, the promoters would be held liable for action under section 447. Further, section 34 elaborates that if any statement in the prospectus is untrue or misleading, the promoter will be held criminally liable under Section 447. On the same lines, section 35 (imposing civil liability for public issue related mis-statements), section 42 (imposing penalty for contravening the provisions w.r.t private placement including default in filing of return of allotment), section 102 (imposing penalty for non-disclosure / wrongful disclosure in the explanatory statement), 284 (liability with respect to non-cooperation with liquidator) to list a few.

This article focuses on who is a promoter/promoter group entity (PGE), what are the implications of being either, how does one get out of the classification, having been into either, both in case of listed and unlisted companies.

Read more

Crowdfunding platforms – risks and concerns in the Indian context

Timothy Lopes, Manager

finserv@vinodkothari.com

Introduction

Crowdfunding as a concept has been in the limelight for quite some time now. Globally there are several crowdfunding platforms that exist. These crowdfunding platforms essentially allow almost anybody to raise funds for any cause, ideas or business ventures. Interestingly, the first online crowdfunding platform was launched back in 2001[1].

However, with the advent of online crowdfunding platforms also comes the inherent risks associated with it. Through this article, the author aims to highlight the inherent risks associated with crowdfunding along with the legal permissibility and restraints in India.

Read more

Melt-down of Market-linked debentures, Debt mutual funds get fatal blow

No grandfathering for MLDs, prospectively, tax benefit for debt mutual funds goes away

-Vinod Kothari and Aanchal Kaur Nagpal

finserv@vinodkothari.com

As expected, the Finance Bill, 2023 was passed on March 24, 2023 by Lok Sabha within minutes. With a huge amount of changes including several newly inserted provisions, the so-called amendments were actually a Bill in itself, minus any “notes on clauses” or “memorandum of delegated legislation”, and given the amending document that refers to page numbers and line numbers of the Bill, it is a hard to read document, more so to realise the long term impact it has for the capital markets.

For capital markets, the amended Bill confirms that there will be no grandfathering for market-linked debentures (MLDs), as it specifically provides for a grandfathering only for debt mutual funds. Thus, the future of an approximately Rs. 20 lakh crore non-equity-oriented mutual funds in the country[1], going forward, will be questionable.

Read more

FAQs on Purpose and Effect test for RPTs

-Team Vinod Kothari and Company | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [316.51 KB]

For further reading on the topic –

Purpose and Effect Test for Related Party Transactions.

Team Corplaw | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [1.84 MB]

Further reading on the topic –

SEBI intends to rationalize public issuances: Issues Consultation Paper on amendments in ICDR Regulations

– Shaivi Bhamaria and Ajay Ramanathan | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [151.10 KB]

Consultation Paper on ESG Disclosures, Ratings and Investing by Mutual Funds

– Payal Agarwal & Shreya Salampuria | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [727.77 KB]

Recent amendments relating to Corporate Bonds

– Vinita Nair, Senior Parnter | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [1.64 MB]

SEBI to provide debenture holders the right to object material related party transactions

Complicates approval process for closely held High Value Debt Listed Entities

– Vinita Nair, Senior Partner | vinita@vinodkothari.com

SEBI continues to tighten the regulatory regime for debt listed entities as it aims to promote corporate bond market. After equating debt listed entities with outstanding value of listed non-convertible debt securities of Rs. 500 crore and above with equity listed entities for the purpose of corporate governance norms, SEBI proposes a stricter approval regime for Related Party Transactions (‘RPTs’) under Reg. 23 of SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 (‘LODR’) vide Consultation paper on review of Corporate Governance norms for a High Value Debt Listed Entity (‘HVDLE’)[1]. This has been rolled out just before the corporate governance provisions become applicable on a mandatory basis effective from April 1, 2023. The composition of 138 HVDLEs, in terms of shareholding pattern, as on March 31, 2022 was as under:

Figure 1: Analysis of shareholding pattern of the HVDLE
Read more

Identification Of Related Parties Of Subsidiaries

Which law to follow? – Listing Regulations or laws applicable to subsidiaries?

– Aisha Begum Ansari, Manager | aisha@vinodkothari.com

The RPT provisions under the SEBI Listing Regulations were substantially amended by SEBI on November 9, 2021. Pursuant to the amendment, the definitions of related party, RPT, material RPT, requirements of obtaining audit committee, and shareholders’ approval were changed.

The definition of ‘RPT’ was amended to include cross RPTs. Earlier, only transactions between the listed entity and its related parties were covered, but now, the following transactions are also covered:

  1. Transaction between listed entity and its related parties;
  2. Transaction between the subsidiaries of listed entity and its related parties;
  3. Transaction between listed entity and related parties of subsidiaries;
  4. Transaction between subsidiaries and related parties of listed entity;
  5. Transaction between subsidiaries and related parties of other subsidiaries.
Read more