A comprehensive framework for compromise settlement and technical write offs

/2 Comments/in , /by

Dayita Kanodia | Executive finserv@vinodkothari.com

The first bad bank loan was, no doubt, made around the time as the opening of the first bank.

James Grant[1]

Background

RBI  released the Framework for Compromise Settlements and Technical Write-offs[2] (Framework) on June 8 2023. This framework, issued exactly four years after the release of the Prudential Framework for Resolution of Stressed Assets[3] (PFRSA), aims to rationalize and harmonize the instructions earlier issued. Additionally, while PFRSA was applicable only to banks and systemically important NBFCs (among others), the present Framework is applicable across all REs, including base layer NBFCs.

Subsequently, to clear the ambiguities that may have arisen after the issuance of the Framework, the RBI also released a set of Frequently Asked Questions[4] on the topic: of these, these FAQs were largely intended to respond to certain questions of intent that were being thrown at the regulator in releasing the Framework.

This article discusses the Framework along with its applicability, as also it intends to help REs to make a calculated decision on choosing between compromise settlements, writedowns, restructuring, or doing nothing at all. For either of the options, the article also discusses  the other requirements which need to be ensured while pursuing the option. 

Read more →

Understanding CSR for NGO

/0 Comments/in , , , , /by

– Pammy Jaiswal, Partner | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [650.02 KB]

FAQs on Social Stock Exchange

/0 Comments/in , /by

Payal Agarwal, Team Corplaw | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [503.60 KB]

Resource Centre on Social Sector

Embracing a Wider Scope for TReDS

/0 Comments/in , /by

Transfer of Factoring Units to come under the purview of TLE in lieu of the regulator’s move to enhance TReDs Platform

– Anita Baid, Vice President | finserv@vinodkothari.com

The concept of Trade Receivables Discounting System (TReDS) was introduced by RBI to enable discounting of invoices of MSME sellers against large corporates, including government departments and public sector undertakings, through an auction mechanism to ensure prompt realisation of trade receivables at competitive market rates. 

TReDS transactions fall under the umbrella of “factoring business.” Factoring is a financial practice where a company sells its trade receivables, or outstanding invoices, to a third party at a discount in exchange for immediate cash. TReDS platforms provide a digital infrastructure for facilitating such transactions, enabling efficient invoice discounting and promoting liquidity for MSMEs.(Our FAQs on TReDS and the India Factoring Report 2023 can be read here and here)

In a move to further strengthen the TReDS and promote smoother financial transactions, the RBI has announced significant enhancements to the TReDS guidelines. These enhancements are in line with the announcement made by RBI in the Statement on Developmental and Regulatory Policies dated February 8, 2023, to address certain challenges faced by financiers while bidding for low-rated buyers’ payables on TReDS platforms. (Our article on the same can be read here)

This article intends to discuss the RBI notification dated June 7, 2023 on Expanding the Scope of Trade Receivables Discounting System, introducing the said enhancements.

Read more →

FAQs on Default Loss Guarantee in Digital Lending

/4 Comments/in , , , /by

An understanding of the Guidelines issued by RBI

(Updated as on April 29, 2024)

Team Finserv | finserv@vinodkothari.com

On September 02, 2022, the RBI issued the “Guidelines on Digital Lending” (“DL Guidelines”), which had essentially put a bar on “Loss sharing/ structured default guarantee arrangements” such as First Loss Default Guarantees, likening their nature to that of “synthetic securitisation” as defined under the Master Direction – Reserve Bank of India (Securitisation of Standard Assets) Directions, 2021 (“SSA Directions”). This caused a disruption in the digital lending industry as most of the arrangements ran on some form of loss-sharing arrangement. (Refer to our FAQs on the Digital Lending Guidelines here)

In its Statement on Developmental and Regulatory Policies dated June 8, 2023, the RBI announced its intention to issue a regulatory framework for permitting Default Loss Guarantee arrangements in Digital Lending[1]. The same day, the Guidelines on Default Loss Guarantee (DLG) in Digital Lending have been issued by the regulator (‘DLG Guidelines’).

We have developed a set of FAQs on the DLG Guidelines, where we intend to answer some of the critical questions relating to the default guarantee arrangements. The FAQs were updated based the RBI FAQs on DLG Guidelines (‘RBI FAQs)  issued on Apr 26, 2024.

Read more →

RBI to release guidelines to permit default guarantees

/0 Comments/in , , , , /by

The evolution of a concept, from its inception to being prohibited, and ultimately establishing a regulatory framework to allow its practice

– Anita Baid (finserv@vinodkothari.com)

The concept of First Loss Default Guarantees (FLDGs) in the financial industry has experienced a remarkable journey, marked by its inception, subsequent prohibition, and eventually being on the verge of a resurgence with the introduction of a regulatory framework. It had gained significant attention in the realm of fintech industry, whose remarkable expansion in India is largely responsible for propelling FLDGs. Nevertheless, it is essential to note that guarantees are not a novel concept; they have been widely employed in the financial sector for a considerable period of time. (Our article on ‘Lending without risk and risk without lending’ can be read here)

In its Statement on Developmental and Regulatory Policies dated June 8, 2023, the RBI has announced its intention to issue a regulatory framework for permitting Default Loss Guarantee arrangements in Digital Lending. This article delves into the intriguing evolution of Structured Default Guarantees, examining their rise, fall, and subsequent rebirth, shedding light on the regulatory landscape that has shaped their existence.

Read more →

GoAir Insolvency: Lessors’ rights gone in thin air?

/2 Comments/in , , , /by

– Financial Services Division, finserv@vinodkothari.com

A Special Bench of NCLT,  New Delhi admitted the insolvency of Go Airlines (India) Ltd, popularly known as GoAir, on the 10th May 2023. The insolvency was admitted on an application of the company itself, on the ground of a self-admitted default of Rs. 11.03 crores towards interest to financial creditors, out of a pile of debt, that is, Rs. 2660 cr towards aircraft lessors and Rs. 1202 cr towards its vendors. The application was admitted in the face of strong opposition by the financial creditors and the lessors of aircrafts taken on lease by the company.

Subsequently, on an appeal before the NCLAT, the appellate forum affirmed the order of the NCLT, rejecting the contention that the filing of the insolvency application was malicious. The matter may still be taken up to higher or other forums, but in the meantime, there are question marks on India as a favoured jurisdiction for aircraft leasing. Aircraft lessors need certainty as to the exercise of their rights over the leased aircraft in the event of a lessee default, and the Cape Town Convention (CTC), signed under the auspices of UNIDROIT way back in 2021, is a set of minimum assurances that the countries signing that convention have provided to aircraft lessors. The question is, India having actually been a signatory to the Convention, is it okay to have stayed the rights of the lessors by way of a moratorium during the entire period of insolvency resolution?

Read more →

Vehicle financiers must follow SARFAESI process for repossession: Patna High Court

/0 Comments/in , , , , /by

Ruling holds self-help repossession as a breach of the borrower’s fundamental rights of livelihood and dignity

– Vinod Kothari, finserv@vinodkothari.com

Repossession of vehicles (from two-wheelers to four-wheelers), in case of borrowers’ defaults, has been done almost entirely using common law process, on the strength of the provisions of the hypothecation agreement. The roughly Rs 500000 crores auto finance market in India, including financing of passenger vehicles and commercial vehicles, rarely makes use of the process of SARFAESI Act for repossession of vehicles from defaulting borrowers, even though most of the NBFCs and all of the banks are authorised to make use of the process.

However, a recent Patna High Court, from a single judge of the Court[1], holds that since hypothecation is a “security interest” on the vehicle, the use of the process of the SARFAESI Act is mandatory, and any repossession action not adhering to the process of that Act is illegal. The Court has gone to the extent of ordaining all banks and NBFCs in the State to return the repossessed vehicles which are either not sold or are traceable to the borrowers on payment of 30% of the due amount, and in case of those vehicles which are not traceable or returnable, it permits the petitioners to seek compensation. It has simultaneously directed the Police to investigate and register cases of use of force or illegal tactics in repossession.

Read more →