FAQs on LODR Second Amendment Regulations, 2023
/3 Comments/in Corporate Laws, LODR, SEBI /by Team Corplaw– Team Corplaw | corplaw@vinodkothari.com
Read our other resources on LODR Second Amendment Regulations, 2023
Samagrata – May, 2023
/0 Comments/in Samagrata /by StaffInter-operable regulatory sandbox: A playground for fintechs ?
/0 Comments/in Financial Services, Fintech /by Team Finserv– Dayita Kanodia, Executive | finserv@vinodkothari.com
A regulatory sandbox allows live testing of innovative products/services under regulatory supervision and with regulatory relaxations. This in turn allows regulators to design evidence-based and innovation-friendly regulations.
An Inter-Operable Regulatory Sandbox or IoRS as defined by both RBI and SEBI is therefore a mechanism to facilitate testing of innovative hybrid financial products / services falling within the regulatory ambit of more than one financial sector regulator.
Read more →YouTube live: RBI Guidelines on Default Loss Guarantee
/0 Comments/in Banking Regulations, digital lending, Financial Services, NBFCs, RBI, Youtube /by StaffAnita Baid in conversation with Vinod Kothari
Live on YouTube – 20th June, 2023 | 5:00 P.M. – https://www.youtube.com/@vinodkotharicompany3966/videos
SEBI prescribes thresholds for determining material events, stringent approval for sale of undertaking and more
/0 Comments/in Companies Act 2013, Corporate Laws, LODR, SEBI /by Staff– Sharon Pinto and Shreya Salampuria | corplaw@vinodkothari.com
| Keeping in view of the significance of the amendments, we are conducting a workshop on the same. Details can be accessed here – https://vinodkothari.com/2023/06/workshop-on-sebi-lodr-2nd-amendment-regulations-2023/ |
Also read our detailed article on –
Stricter framework for sale, lease or disposal of undertaking by a listed entity
/1 Comment/in Amendments to the Companies Act 2013, Companies Act 2013, Corporate Laws, LODR, MCA, SEBI /by Nitu Poddar– Nitu Poddar | corplaw@vinodkothari.com
Reg 37A of Listing Regulations requires additional voting and disclosure requirements
| The article was also published by IndiaCorpLaw and can be viewed here |
Disposal of an undertaking (whole or substantially the whole) can be done either as part of a scheme of arrangement or otherwise by way of slump sale / business transfer agreement (‘BTA’). Disposal, other than by way of scheme of arrangement, have so far been regulated as per section 180(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013 (‘Act’) which requires approval of the shareholders by way of special resolution. SEBI has prescribed approval requirement in this regard by way of introduction of regulation 37A vide SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) (Second Amendment) Regulations, 2023 (‘Amendment Regulations’) effective from June 14, 2023 that requires listed entities to follow a stricter regime for disposal of undertaking inter alia mandating approval from majority of the public shareholders who are not interested in the transaction, disclosure of the object, commercial rationale and use of proceeds arising from such transaction. While there is an exemption provided in case of transactions with a wholly owned subsidiary (WOS), the approval regime will apply in case of disposal of undertaking by such WOS or any reduction in shareholding in the WOS subsequent to transfer of the undertaking.
The said amendment is based on the Consultation Paper rolled by SEBI on February 21, 2023. Apart from incorporating the provisions proposed in this regard in the Consultation Paper, the amendment has introduced new provisions as well. Provision with respect to seeking approval from the shareholders of the listed entity in case a WOS is used as a conduit for transfer in undertaking is a new requirement brought in through the amendment.
Read more →Workshop on SEBI LODR 2nd Amendment Regulations, 2023
/2 Comments/in Corporate Laws, LODR, SEBI /by Staff
In view of the overwhelming response received for our workshop held yesterday, we are announcing a repeat workshop on 30th June, 2023. You may register your interest here – https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSff223EAvPfU3roZogwubvO0cQ1S1Dx8R9Kopv8XH-ff0nX_g/viewform Loading…
Getting material on “material” events and information:
/2 Comments/in Corporate Laws, LODR, SEBI /by Payal AgarwalSEBI notifies amendments to Listing Regulations
-Payal Agarwal, Manager (payal@vinodkothari.com)
Keeping in view of the significance of the amendments, we are conducting a workshop on the same. Details can be accessed here – https://vinodkothari.com/2023/06/workshop-on-sebi-lodr-2nd-amendment-regulations-2023/
The importance of transparency and timely dissemination of material information for a listed entity needs no emphasis, since most of these events and information may have a direct bearing on the price discovery of the securities of the listed entities and the investors’ decisions. The intent of Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 (“Listing Regulations”) is to ensure a seamless flow of information; the Regulation is complemented by Schedule III thereto, which provides an indicative list of the events or information in a listed entity that may be considered “material” and thereby, requires prompt disclosure by way of intimations to the stock exchange(s) in which the entity is listed.
While Para A of Part A of Schedule III specifies the list of information/ events which are “deemed” material, Para B specifies a list of information/ events which are to be tested based on the application of guidelines of materiality. Further, Para C requires intimation of any major development that is likely to affect the business and Regulation 30 also provides a residuary provision of intimation of any other information or event that does not fall either under Para A or Part B of Part A of the Listing Regulations, however, is material. The guidelines of materiality for the purpose of testing the events/ information under Para B of Part A of Schedule III are provided in sub-regulation (4) of Reg 30 and are supposed to be documented in the policy for determination of materiality (“Materiality Policy”) of the listed entity. The Materiality Policy of a listed entity plays a prominent role in determining the disclosure practices of a listed entity.
SEBI vide an amendment notification dated 14th June 2023 has notified (“Amendment Regulations”) several changes to the Listing Regulations which were earlier proposed in a Consultation Paper with respect to the disclosure of material events. The same has now been incorporated under the Listing Regulations itself. A few of these include :
- Quantifying the meaning of “material”, thereby limiting discretion with the listed entities,
- Requiring amendments in Materiality Policy;
- Reducing timelines for disclosures;
- Mandatory verification of market rumours by top 100 (250 from FY 24-25) listed entities;
- Broadening and shuffling of the events/ information listed under Schedule III etc.
The Amendment Regulations are applicable from the 30th day of the publication of the notification, i.e., on and from 14th July, 2023. Further, the amendments are applicable only to the equity-listed entities, since debt-listed entities including High-value Debt Listed Entities are outside the scope of Regulation 30. We have listed some of the major amendments in this write-up.
Read more →A comprehensive framework for compromise settlement and technical write offs
/2 Comments/in Financial Services, RBI /by StaffDayita Kanodia | Executive finserv@vinodkothari.com
The first bad bank loan was, no doubt, made around the time as the opening of the first bank.
James Grant[1]
Background
RBI released the Framework for Compromise Settlements and Technical Write-offs[2] (Framework) on June 8 2023. This framework, issued exactly four years after the release of the Prudential Framework for Resolution of Stressed Assets[3] (PFRSA), aims to rationalize and harmonize the instructions earlier issued. Additionally, while PFRSA was applicable only to banks and systemically important NBFCs (among others), the present Framework is applicable across all REs, including base layer NBFCs.
Subsequently, to clear the ambiguities that may have arisen after the issuance of the Framework, the RBI also released a set of Frequently Asked Questions[4] on the topic: of these, these FAQs were largely intended to respond to certain questions of intent that were being thrown at the regulator in releasing the Framework.
This article discusses the Framework along with its applicability, as also it intends to help REs to make a calculated decision on choosing between compromise settlements, writedowns, restructuring, or doing nothing at all. For either of the options, the article also discusses the other requirements which need to be ensured while pursuing the option.
Read more →

