SEBI approves the reduction of face value to Rs. 10000 for privately placed debt securities

Palak Jaiswani, Manager & Lavanya Tandon, Executive | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [167.70 KB]

Will Insiders Tread Trading Plan 2.0?

Insider Trading Regulations amended in line with Consultation Paper

Heta Mehta | Executive | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

The concept of Trading Plan (‘TP’) that existed since May 2015 continued to remain unpopular due to the stringent conditions laid down in the Insider Trading Regulations. The framework was set to be reviewed based on empirical evidence and feedback post introduction and determine if SEBI needs to dilute or increase the regulatory requirement. In order to make it more realistic and captivating, SEBI’s Working Group suggested reforms vide Consultation Paper dated 24th November, 2023[1] that was approved by SEBI in its board meeting held on  March 15, 2024. SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) (Second Amendment) Regulations, 2024 notified on June 25, 2024 will be effective from September 24, 2024. As a concept, it is not unique to India, globally, both the US and UK have similar TP concepts with some or the other variations when compared to our legislation. This article discusses the amendments, including the rationale provided in the CP, relevant points discussed in the SEBI Board meeting and our analysis on the same.

Read more

Making life easy for listed entities: SEBI proposes action on Expert Committee recommendations

– Team Corplaw (corplaw@vinodkothari.com)

Last updated on October 02, 2024

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [308.46 KB]

FAQs on Verification of Market rumour by Listed Entities

Team corplaw | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [864.16 KB]

Refer to our related resources below:

  1. Presentation on Verification of Market Rumour by listed entities and other related amendments
  2. SEBI notifies rumour verification requirements, application of market cap based provisions etc.
  3. Silence no more golden: New regulatory regime forces top listed companies to respond to rumours
  4. Getting material on “material” events and information: SEBI notifies amendments to Listing Regulations
  5. Youtube lecture: Demystifying rumour verification by listed entities
  6. Resource centre on LODR

Presentation on Verification of Market Rumour by listed entities and other related amendments

Team Corplaw | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [1.07 MB]

Also, refer to our related resources below:

  1. FAQs on Verification of Market rumour by Listed Entities
  2. SEBI notifies rumour verification requirements, application of market cap based provisions etc.
  3. Silence no more golden: New regulatory regime forces top listed companies to respond to rumours
  4. Getting material on “material” events and information: SEBI notifies amendments to Listing Regulations
  5. Youtube lecture: Demystifying rumour verification by listed entities
  6. Resource centre on LODR

Online workshop on Verification of Market Rumour by listed entities and other related amendments

Register here
Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [912.01 KB]

Other resources on the amendment:

  1. YouTube video on aforesaid amendment: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-BvHsUtR4TI&feature=youtu.be
  2. Article on Top companies forced to respond to rumours on big price spikes: Changes in Listing Regulations relate rumour responses to “material price movement”
  3. Snippet summarizing the amendment: https://lnkd.in/gSJM-YUj

SEBI notifies rumour verification requirements, application of market cap based provisions etc

Ankit Singh Mehar, Senior Executive and Khushi Hariyani, Executive | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [206.09 KB]

Also see our related resources:

  1. FAQs on Verification of Market rumour by Listed Entities
  2. Presentation on Verification of Market Rumour by listed entities and other related amendments
  3. Top companies forced to respond to rumours on big price spikes: Changes in Listing Regulations relate rumour responses to “material price movement”
  4. Silence no more golden: New regulatory regime forces top listed companies to respond to rumours
  5. Getting material on “material” events and information: SEBI notifies amendments to Listing Regulations
  6. Demystifying rumour verification by listed entities

Top companies forced to respond to rumours on big price spikes: Changes in Listing Regulations relate rumour responses to “material price movement”

This version: 21st May, 2024

Team Corplaw | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Given the significance of the amendments, we are organizing an online workshop on Verification of Market Rumours by listed entities and other related amendments on Monday, 27th May, 2024.
Details of workshop can be accessed here
Register here

Regulatory instruments and standards on rumour response:

What is the change? And applicable from when?

  • Reg 30 (11) & (11A) of Listing Regulations dealing with rumour verification. There was a work in progress at SEBI on making the regulation more certain and easier-to-implement. Changes were made in Re. 30 (11) requiring top 100/top 250 companies to mandatorily respond to market rumours, but there were several issues in implementation. SEBI Consultation Paper w.r.t. Verification of Market Rumours  (‘CP’)  based on the recommendations of the Industry Standards Forum (ISF) and subsequently, SEBI Board decision taken in the meeting held on March 15, 2024 resulted into these changes.
  • Original implementation dates were October 1, 2023 and thereafter, extended twice to February 1, 2024/ August 1, 2024 and thereafter to June 1, 2024/ December 1, 2024 for top 100/ top 250 companies1. It is now confirmed that the implementation dates remain the same. 
  • Further, SEBI vide Circular dated May 21, 2024 has given recognition to the Industry Standards Forum (ISF)2 that released the Industry Standards Note (ISN) on rumour verification in order to facilitate uniform approach and set out an SOP for compliance with rumour verification requirement. The compliance with Industry Standards are mandatory for the listed entities [SEBI Circular dated 21 May, 2024]. The ISN inter alia covers following aspects:
    • Delineation of “mainstream media” (as requirement to respond will only be applicable to rumours reported in specific media sources (see below) ;
    • Guidance on rumour responses through illustrative scenarios pertaining to potential M&A transactions, ;
    • Guiding principles through some illustrative non M&A transaction scenarios, such as whistleblower complaints, internal investigations, potential change in KMPs, ill health of MD/ CEO etc.
Read more: Top companies forced to respond to rumours on big price spikes: Changes in Listing Regulations relate rumour responses to “material price movement”
  1. Who will be impacted, and from when?
  • Top 100/top 250 companies based on market capitalisation.
    • Presently as per March 31, 2024
    • Effective from December 31, 2024 based on the average market capitalisation from July 1 to December 31 of that calendar year
  • Top 100 companies – 1st June 2024
  • Top 250 companies – 1st Dec 2024
  • For the rest of the companies, the framework is still voluntary, but logically, the reference point being “material price movement” may be extended to these companies too.
  1. What will affected companies be required to do?
  • If:
    • There is a material price movement (MPM)  
    • There is a rumour in mainstream media
    • About some definitive event or information
    • Which is “impending”, that is, about to happen or waiting to be disclosed by the Company.
  • The company shall respond:
    • Either confirm that rumour
    • Or deny it
    • Or make a statement that the rumoured event has not become disclosable at the present time
    • Or remain silent, if the rumour does not qualify for a response in terms of the ISN
    • And for either confirmation or denial, if the company needs further information from a promoter, director, KMP, or SMP (that is, the rumoured information pertains to them), the company shall promptly seek the same, and the counterparty shall promptly, accurately and adequately respond to the same.
    • The company shall do the confirmation or denial or provide a clarification within 24 hours from the trigger of the MPM
  • The company need not respond:
    • If the rumoured event or information is not “specific”, or does not otherwise qualify for a response
    • If the rumoured event/information pertains to the pre-intimated items in a  notice of Board meeting u/r 29 (1) of Listing Regulations .
      • Appropriate disclosure to be made after conclusion of the Board meeting.
      • However, if the rumour goes beyond the information in the pre-intimation, and otherwise qualifies for response, the company will respond. 
  1. Basic attributes of a rumour requiring response:
    1. Should be relating to the Company and not generally about sector, industry, geography, etc
    2. Should be specific, that is, should give some facts/information likely to influence the decision of investors, or should have quoted a source which can be relied for the information in question
    3. Should be relating to an event/development which is impending, that is, imminent, at a stage of development
    4. Should not be an elaboration of something that has already been disclosed by the Company, unless new material facts or information not disclosed by the company are contained
    5. Should be contained in “mainstream media”
    6. Should have caused an MPM
    7. There should be a reasonable nexus between the rumour and the MPM, so as to lead to a conclusion that the MPM has been triggered by the rumour
  1. What is the trigger point of the MPM (MPM Trigger)?
  • Since MPM (see discussion below) is based on price movements during a day, the trigger point may happen at any time during trading hours.
  1. What is MPM?
  • As per the Framework  provided by NSE, the parameters for MPM are as under:
    • Cut off percentages [that is, 5, 4 or 3%, +/- relevant index variation in the same direction as the MPM – see below] for price variation, or the price band being hit ;
    • Relevant index changes: Nifty 50 in case of NSE listed entity/ Sensex in case of BSE listed entity/ both in case listed on both, to be seen at the start of the trading day i.e. at 9.30 a.m. That is, change in the index is frozen at the start of the trading day.
    • ISN intends to classify rumoured news into “positive news” or “negative news”, and correlate the price change with the same (that is, require response only where prices have gone up with a positive news and gone down with a negative news). However, for many news pieces, the ascertainment of whether the news is positive or negative will not be possible. Therefore, the only basis for determination of the direction of the news is the direction of the prices. For instance, disposal of a division may be negative news, if the sustainable income from the same will be lost, but may be taken as positive if the rate of return from the outgoing division was suboptimal. 
    • However, the reflection of the movement in the Index (provided is equal to or more than 1%) needs to be done on the MPM cut off percentages only if the Index movement is in the same direction as the MPM.
    • As for the stock, the price movements are taken at any time during the trading day..
    • Percentage variation in share price and the benchmark index movement will be calculated wrt the closing price of the immediately preceding trading day.
Price range of the listed equity sharesPercentage variation in share price which shall be treated as material price
Benchmark index movement (+/-) is less than 1% at 9.30 amBenchmark index movement (+/-) is  greater than 1% at 9.30 am, and MPM is in the same direction as the Index changeIn cases not covered by column on LHS 
Rs. 0 to 99.99≥ 5%≥ 5% + % change in Benchmark index at 9:30 am) or Band hit≥ 5%
Rs. 100 to 199.99≥ 4%≥4% + % change in Benchmark index at 9:30 am) or Band hit≥ 4%
Rs. 200 and above≥ 3%≥3% + % change in Benchmark index at 9:30 am) or Band hit≥ 3%
  • Assuming there is an MPM in my scrip at 12.30, which subsides later in the day, shall we still say the MPM has occurred? Answer seems to be yes. In case of intraday price movement (i.e. after 9:30 am), only the price range-based price variation in the scrip to be considered, irrespective of the Index movement. 
  • While there may be price movement due to a combination of various factors such as rumour, announcements or other events (other than the rumoured event), then MPM is deemed attributed \to the rumour.
  1. Where should one look for rumour? 
  • ISN has restricted the scope of “mainstream media” to the following:
    • English national dailies satisfying the following conditions:
      •  Top English dailies with a circulation of 1 lakh or more copies as per RNI data; currently 14 newspapers along with the editions have been listed by ISN.
    • Business/ Financial News Dailies: Economic Times, Business Standard, Live Mint, Financial Express and Hindu Business Line. 
    • Regional Dailies: the top 2 (two) regional dailies having the highest circulation, for each of the 22 (twenty two) official languages of India, subject to meeting the RNI Circulation Threshold, as per the list of regional dailies given in ISN. 
    • Digital versions of the newspapers covered above 
    • Digital/ online news sources: specified news sources meeting the following Business News Parameters: 
  • Specified sources are – Bloomberg, BQ Prime, Money Control, Business Today, Business World, Reuters, Reuters India, and Press Trust India. 
  • International media :
    • Top business/ finance dailies (from top 5 jurisdictions from where foreign portfolio investments are concentrated) comprise –
      • Wall Street Journal and Financial Times for USA; 
      • Business Times and Financial Times for Singapore; and 
      • Financial Times for UK;
    • For other jurisdictions where the Company has “material operations” (in our view, the Policy may define what is “material” operation), the Board is required to identify list of English business/ financial news sources from such jurisdictions. List to be published in the materiality policy.
  • Business News Channels: satisfying the following conditions:
    • English news channels – CNBC TV-18, ET Now and NDTV Profit
    • Other Business news channels – CNBC Awaaz, ET Swadesh, Zee Business and CNBC Bazaar
  • Exclusions: News aggregators  (for e.g. google news, inshorts, daily hunt etc.) and social media platforms (for e.g. whatsapp, twitter, facebook, instagram etc.) will not get covered under mainstream media.
  • Inclusions: Social media handles of news sources identified above, will be included. However, quotes/ re-tweets/ re-posts made from such social media handles will not be included.

  1. What are the actionable for companies w.r.t. Mainstream media?
  • Companies to put in place appropriate technology solutions, engage external media agencies;
    • For identifying and tracking the digital news sources set out above.
  • Implement internal systems for prompt reporting, coordination and communication between investor relations, corporate communications and compliance teams.
  • Companies are required to respond only once and not when the same or similar rumour is published in another news source.
  • Question – are companies expected to track all that is written about the company, in all the “mainstream media”, at all times? Answer should be No. However, the company may have to keep sources/media agencies on the standby, that is, to trigger them into action when there is MPM.
  1. What is the guidance for action? 
  • Companies have to be alert on MPM. MPM is assessed on a daily basis – therefore, companies may have appropriate technology tools to give a signal if there is an MPM.
  • If there is an MPM, the company will have to search for “rumour” in “mainstream media”.
    • Here, while companies may be required to keep appropriate technology/ arrangements with external media agencies in place, the same should not be taken to mean that the company is required to track rumour on a daily basis, irrespective of the MPM trigger. 
    • The tracking has to be done for a reasonable period of time backwards. Ideally speaking, the impact of a rumour on price will be reflected within 24-48 hours itself, however, companies may consider keeping a window of 5-10 trading days or any other specific period as part of their internal SOP for the tracking back of rumour in case of an MPM trigger. 
  • What does the rumour relate to? Is it about some “definitive” event or information, or generic in nature (say performance, prospects, etc)? Is it about the company or relates to the company specifically, and not generic (for example, sector, country, economy, etc)? If the answer to these questions are yes, see below.
  • If the answer is yes, does the rumour relate to an “impending” event or information? That is, there is some event or information within the company which is developing, but the rumour has leaked the same. If yes, confirm it. If no, then deny.
  • Do all of this within 24 hours of the MPM Trigger.

[Note – Where a prior intimation of Board meeting of the company has been given under Reg 29 of LODR for such “impending” event or information, the company need not respond to the rumour till the conclusion of the Board meeting.]

In the Table below, we take few situations to understand the applicability of verification of market rumour:

MPMImpending specific event under reg. 30Rumour in mainstream media Verification of rumour by company required?
YesYesYesYes
YesNoYesYes, as the existence of MPM by itself satisfies the condition for rumour verification
YesYesNoNo, there is no rumour to be verified. The company may disclose based on the information/event reaching the appropriate stage.
YesNoNoThere is no rumour to be verified. 
NoYesYesRumour verification is not required, but the general principles of disclosure of events or information at an appropriate stage will be followed.
  1. What happens if the rumour is confirmed?
  • Any reported event or information on which below mentioned pricing norms apply,  the effect on the price of the equity shares of the listed entity due to MPM and confirmation of the reported event or information to be excluded for calculation of the unaffected price for that transaction.
    • Chapter V (preferential issue) of the ICDR Regulations (refer amendment including as part of a scheme of arrangement; or 
    • Chapter VI (QIP) of the ICDR Regulations (refer amendment);
    • Regulation 8 (17) (offer price) or Regulation 9 (6) (listed securities offered as consideration)  of the SAST Regulations (refer amendment);
    • Regulation 19 (price in case of open market buy-back) or Regulation 22B (vi) (computation of lower end of price range in case of buy-back through book building) of the Buy-back regulations (refer amendment).
    • scheme of arrangement involving a listed company (irrespective of whether the scheme involves a preferential issue or not), undertaken in compliance with the requirements of the SEBI Master Circular on Schemes of Arrangement, dated June 20, 2023; or 
    • any other transaction where the pricing is regulatorily required to be linked to the traded price of the scrip, including but not limited to cross border transactions involving the equity instruments (as defined in FEMA NDI Rules) of a listed company (i.e. purchase, sale, issuance of such equity instruments).
  1. What happens if the rumor is not verified?
  • Unverified event or information cannot be considered as generally available information for the purpose of PIT Regulations. The definition has been amended to exclude unverified event or information reported in print or electronic media (refer amendment). That is to say, merely because the event/information is rumoured, but not confirmed by the company, it cannot be said to be generally available information.
  • No “unaffected price” computation; that is, all price movements will be taken into consideration for the purpose of corporate actions 
  1. Are any changes in materiality policy required?
  • Amendments in law will override. The timeline for responding may be aligned from 24 hours from the reporting of the event or information to 24 hours from the trigger of MPM. The obligation cast on the promoter, director, KMP or SMP may also be inserted in the policy.
  • Specific amendments to be made in line with the ISN as indicated below:
    • In addition to the specified international news sources for top 100 listed entities, all listed entities covered by mandatory rumour verification requirement are required to identify the foreign jurisdictions where the company has material business operations, along with a list of English business/ financial news sources from such foreign jurisdictions to be tracked. List of such news sources and parameters applied for determining what would constitute ‘material business operation’ to be published in the materiality policy.
  • SOP may be framed additionally to add the responsibility centers, timelines and other operational aspects.
    • This may also cover the time frame upto which rumours will be tracked in mainstream media, in the event of an MPM trigger. 
  1. Who will be responsible to ensure compliance?
  • Companies will have to define responsibility. Generally speaking, the compliance officer remains responsible to ensure compliance with LODR Regulations [Reg. 6(2)(a)], but internally, for rumours and responses, companies may define the ownership/responsibility centre.
  • The Industry Standards refer to “officers” u/s 2(59) of Companies Act. The definition therein is a very broad and inclusive definition. For the purpose of compliance with these regulations, the company may specify the meaning of “officers” to refer to the KMPs and SMPs of the company.  
  • If the information has been sought by the company from the promoter, director, KMP, SMP, then the respective promoter, director, KMP, SMP is responsible to give adequate, accurate and timely response to queries raised or explanation sought.
  • The stock exchanges shall independently continue to seek clarification from the listed entities on news/rumours pertaining to the listed entity as part of their existing surveillance measures.
  1. What are the Industry Standards w.r.t. M&A Transaction Specific Aspects?
  • Scope of M&A Transactions 
    • transactions concerning purchase, sale, buyback, delisting of securities of listed company;
    • Preferential issue or any other fund-raising;
    • Scheme of arrangement involving listed entity or any of its subsidiaries
    • Acquisition / sale of undertaking or shareholding of another company;
    • Proposed joint venture between listed entity and another entity.
  • Exclusions – transactions undertaken in the ordinary course of business
    • An on-market bulk/ block deal transaction, in respect of listed entity’s securities.
    • An on-market treasury transaction or non-strategic transaction (pursuant to treasury management policies/ objectives – for e.g. investing surplus funds to acquire 0.5% equity stake undertaken by a listed entity in respect of another listed company)
    • Treasury transaction/ non-strategic transaction would generally have the following features –
      • pertains to the treasury function, i.e., investment of surplus funds of the company, 
      • indicates the regular investments made by the company in the stock market, 
      • is not intended to fulfil any strategic expectations of the company, 
      • the size of such investments are similar to other frequent investments,  
      • the company has not raised funds specifically for making such investments, and 
      • decisions with respect to such investments are generally taken by a delegated authority under section 179 of the Companies Act, 2013. 
  • Transaction stages
    • Preparatory stage (where the name of the target/ counterparty is not disclosable); and
      • Signing of NDA, non-binding term sheet, letter of intent, commencement of DD, engagement of professionals for DD, evaluating overall viability of the deal (including for internal management) or engaging registered valuers;
      • Constitution of sub-committee of Board to evaluate material terms/ assess viability, Committee granting an in-principle approval subject to further evaluation.
      • Illustrative language of disclosure provided for each of the two sub-stages discussed  above.
    • Advanced stages (where the name of the target/ counterparty is disclosable)
      • Multi-party bid process is ongoing and sole/ exclusive bidder is pending to be identified/ confirmed or has been confirmed, 
      • parties have entered into binding term-sheet w.r.t. listed target, 
      • where all material commercial terms have been agreed and final approval of Board or delegated board committee is being sought,
      • Illustrative language of disclosure provided for listed bidder(s) and for listed target.
      • Unaffected price to be considered only in case of advanced stages.
  • Where company is  not a party to the deal/ does not have ‘knowledge of the deal’3
    • no specific confirmation/ denial would be required.
  1. What are the Industry Standards w.r.t. Non M&A Transaction Specific Aspects?
  • Illustration of Non-M&A Transactions
    • Whistle-blower complaint received by the Company;
    • Internal Review or Investigation i.r.o. operational / financial aspects of the Company;
    • Potential change in KMPs4 (including resignation and/ or removal of KMPs);
    • Situation where MD/CEO is indisposed or unavailable to carry out the role in a regular manner for more than 45 days in any rolling period of 90 days on account of ill health.
  • Guiding Principles for rumour verification of non-M&A Transactions 
    • The market rumour should provide specific identifiable details:
      • details of the matter/ event; or 
      • Should provide quotes or be attributed to sources who are reasonably expected to be knowledgeable about the matter,
      • Excludes market rumours that are vague or general in nature.
    • The market rumour should be i.r.o impending event i.e imminent event, close at hand or about to happen,
    • The market rumour should result in MPM.

Also see our related resources:

  1. SEBI notifies rumour verification requirements, application of market cap based provisions etc.
  2. Silence no more golden: New regulatory regime forces top listed companies to respond to rumours
  3. Getting material on “material” events and information: SEBI notifies amendments to Listing Regulations
  4. Youtube lecture: Demystifying rumour verification by listed entities

  1. SEBI Circular dated September 30, 2023 and SEBI Circular dated January 25, 2024 ↩︎

Relinquishment of source of profit in favour of an RP: also an RPT

– Mahak Agarwal | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Updated on December 13, 2025

The broad spectrum of the definition of Related Party Transactions (RPTs) under the Listing Regulation, continues to be an error prone area in terms of compliance. A recent SEBI ruling1 has further strengthens this aspect where the phrase ‘transfer of resources, services or obligations’ has been explained in an extremely new dimension with a commendable insight from the authorities which again shows that the regulators can no more be restricted by the imaginary boundaries placed by the corporates when it comes tightening the loose ends of corporate governance.

This article delves into the basis which the Regulators considered for concluding a mutual understanding and agreement between related parties to be an RPT notwithstanding the  contention of the company. The essential question of law involved in this case was whether the allocation of certain products and geographic areas between RPs constitutes an RPT. The article contains our analysis of SEBI’s order and highlights the recent order passed by the SAT upon appeal  in the matter, reaffirming the said stand.

Read more

Trust, but verify: AIFs cannot be used as regulatory arbitrage

SEBI mandates ongoing due diligence for investors and investments made by AIFs

-Vinita Nair, Senior Partner and Lavanya Tandon, Executive | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

May 03, 2024 (updated on October 9, 2024)

Background

SEBI had raised concerns relating to evergreening of loans, circumvention of FEMA norms, QIB regulations and other concerns on regulatory arbitrage by Alternative Investment Funds (‘AIFs’) in its Consultation Paper issued in January, 2024. SEBI also recorded 40+ cases wherein the structure of AIF had been abused and used to circumvent extant financial sector regulations. Read our analysis in the article ‘AIFs ail SEBI: Cannot be used for regulatory breach’ dated January 31, 2024. Further, RBI had also barred all regulated entities (REs) with respect to their investments in AIFs, discussed in our article.

Subsequent to receipt of public comments, the proposal to mandate due-diligence (‘DD’) of investors and each of the investments made by the AIF was approved in the SEBI Board meeting held on March 15, 2024. SEBI notified SEBI (Alternative Investment Funds) (Second Amendment) Regulations, 2024 effective from April 25, 2024 amending Reg. 20 of the SEBI (Alternative Investment Funds) Regulations, 2012 (‘AIF Regulations’) dealing with general obligations thereby requiring every a. AIF, b. investment manager of the AIF, c. KMP of the AIF, and d. KMP of the investment manager, to exercise specific DD with respect to their investors and investments in order to prevent facilitation of circumvention of such laws as may be specified by SEBI from time to time. 

The list of laws, thresholds and conditions for DD, reporting requirements etc. has been provided in  SEBI circular dated Oct 8, 2024 (‘SEBI Circular’). DD is required to be carried out prior to making of investments as per implementation standards formulated by Standard Setting Forum for AIFs (‘SFA’)  and published on websites of the industry associations which are part of the SFA, i.e., Indian Venture  and  Alternate  Capital  Association (‘IVCA’), PE VC CFO Association and Trustee Association of India. 

Scope of laws covered under the ambit of due diligence

The list of laws provided in the SEBI Circular comprises of the following: 

  • Provisions of SEBI (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2018 (‘ICDR Regulations’), and other regulations of SEBI wherein benefits or relaxations have been provided to entities designated as Qualified Institutional Buyers (‘QIBs’).
  • Provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (‘SARFAESI Act’) wherein benefits are provided to entities designated as Qualified Buyers (‘QBs’).
  • Prudential norms specified by RBI for regulated lenders with respect to Income Recognition, Asset Classification, Provisioning and restructuring of stressed assets;
  • Rule 6 of FEMA (Non-Debt Instruments) Rules, 2019 (NDI Rules) for investment from countries sharing land border with India ( read with Press Note 3 dated April 17, 2020 of FDI Policy 2020)

Timing, thresholds for DD, reporting requirements

Pursuant to the SEBI Circular, the due diligence for various investors and investments is required to be carried out by a. AIF, b. investment manager of the AIF, c. KMP of the AIF, and d. KMP of the investment manager in accordance with the Implementation Standards. The table below indicates in brief the criteria, checkpoints and timelines for conducting due diligence along with the consequences of the outcome. 

Sr. NoObjective intended to be achieved by investors  through investments in AIF schemeRegulations/ Directions/ Norms applicableApplicability of requirement of DD for every scheme of AIF (refer Note 1)Checkpoints for manager for specific DD Timing of DD Consequence of outcome of DD & reporting requirements, if any
1Benefits designated for QIBs ICDR and other SEBI RegulationsIf an investor, or investors belonging  to the same group, contribute(s)50% or more to the corpus of the scheme.Manager to check if such if investor/ investors of the same group is/are:(i) QIBs themselves or,(ii) Entities established, owned or controlled by the Central Government or a State Government or the Government of a foreign country, including central banks and sovereign wealth funds.Note: Where such investor is an AIF or fund set up in IFSC or outside India, above check to be carried out on a look through basis.Prior to availing benefits available to QIBs 
Refer Note 2 below for existing investments & Note 3 for proposed investments.Manager to provide confirmation to SE or lead manager or merchant banker on this.
2Benefits designated for QBsUnder SARFAESI ActIf an investor, or investors belonging  to the same group, contribute(s)50% or more to the corpus of the scheme.Same as abovePrior to making any investments or availing benefits Refer Note 2 below for existing investments & Note 3 for proposed investments.
3RBI regulated lenders/ entities ever-greening their stressed loans/ assets & circumventing RBI normsRBI norms on Income    Recognition,    Asset    Classification, Provisioning and Restructuring of stressed loans/ assets(a)whose manager or sponsor is an entity regulated by RBI; or,(b)that has investor(s)regulated by RBI who:(i)individually or   along   with   investors   of the same   group contribute(s) 25% or more to the corpus of the scheme; or(ii) is an associate of the manager/ sponsor of the AIF;(iii) has majority or veto power [by itself, or through its representatives/ nominees] in voting over  decisions of the investment  committee  set up  by   the manager to approve investment decisions of the scheme.Note: where investor is an AIF or fund set up in IFSC or outside India, criteria check to be carried out on a look through basis.Refer Note 4.Prior to making any investments, to avoid indirect investment by RBI regulated lender/ entity.Refer Note 2 below for existing investments & Note 3 for proposed investments.
4Investment from countries sharing land border with IndiaFEMA (NDI) Rules, 2019Where 50% or more of the corpus of the scheme is contributed by investors (a)who are citizens of/are from/are situated in a country which shares land border with India; or(b)whose beneficial owners, as determined  in  terms  of  Rule  9 (3)  of  the  PMLA (Maintenance  of Records)  Rules,  2005, are citizens  of/are from/are situated in a country which shares a land border with India.If the proposed investment would result in the scheme holding           10 % or more of equity/equity-linked securities issued by the company (on a fully-diluted basis), the manager to check details stated in the previous column, by collecting information on the country of investors and their beneficial owners.Prior to making any investmentRefer Note 2 below for existing investments & Note 5 for proposed investments.

Note 1: same group’ shall mean ‘related parties’  and  ‘relatives’ as  defined  in  SEBI  (Listing  Obligations  and  Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.

Note 2

For Sr nos 1 to 3: DD requirement is applicable for existing investments too, held by AIF schemes as on October 8, 2024:

  • If DD check not satisfactory – details of investment to be reported to AIF’s custodian on or before April 07, 2025, in the format as per Annexure 1 of the circular;
  • If DD check satisfactory – AIF manager to submit an undertaking to AIF’s custodian on or before April 07, 2025.

For Sr no. 4: Reporting is required to be made for existing investments held by AIF schemes as on October 8, 2024 if the scheme holds 10% or more of equity/ equity-linked securities on a fully-diluted basis,  to AIF’s custodian on or before April 07, 2025 in the format prescribed by SFA.

Note 3

Consequence of not satisfying requirements of DD checks specified by SFA for proposed investments in case of Sr nos 1 to 3:

  • Such investor or investor group to be excluded along with necessary disclosure in the private placement memorandum (PPM); or 
  • Investment cannot be made.

Note 4: 

Note 5: Details of investment, which would result in the scheme holding 10% or more of equity/ equity-linked securities on a fully-diluted basis, to be reported to the custodian within 30 days of investment, in the below format specified by SFA.

DD requirement – one-time or ongoing?

As discussed in the SEBI BM Agenda, the  purpose  of  the  due-diligence  check  is  to  prevent  facilitation of any circumvention of provisions of financial sector regulators, which cannot be a time specific check. An entity who intends to circumvent can design the structure in such a way that, at a later date post investment, it acquires the units  of  AIFs  post  investment,  such  as  buying  the  units  of  an  existing investor or by acquiring control over the existing investor entity, as per prior arrangement.  Accordingly, it has been indicated that due diligence around investors and investments will be an ongoing one.

Applicability of DD – prospective or retrospective?

As per the SEBI circular this is applicable for existing and prospective investments. Refer Note 2 above.

Obligations of Custodian to the AIF

  • Information received from AIFs under Note 2 to be furnished to SEBI on or before May 7, 2025.
  • Information received from AIFs in terms of Note 4 above on a monthly basis to be compiled and reported to SEBI within 10 working days from month end.

Power of AIF to exclude an investor

As per SEBI Circular, in cases where the outcome of DD is not satisfactory, in that case the AIF will either have to exclude the investor or investor group or abstain from making the proposed investment. 

Dealing with power to exclude an investor, in April  2023 SEBI had issued ‘Guidelines with respect to excusing or excluding an investor from an investment of AIF that empowered an AIF to excuse its investor from participating in a particular investment in the following circumstances:

Figure 1: Circumstances to excuse an investor of AIF

Conclusion

The present amendment and SEBI Circular lays an onerous burden on the AIF, manager and KMP of the AIF and the manager. The DD requirement has become effective from October 8, 2024 and applies to existing investments as well. The AIFs have an actionable of evaluating the existing investments in the scheme in the light of the present amendment and ensure reporting in next 6 months. The obligation of on-going due diligence will result in a compliance burden, but is justified given the intent of law as “quando aliquid prohibetur ex directo, prohibetur et per obliquum” i.e. things that cannot be done directly should not be done indirectly either. AIFs will continue ‘trust, but verify’ using the DD standards for due diligence. The trustee/ sponsor of the AIF is required to ensure that compliance status of this amendment is reported to SEBI in the ‘Compliance Test Report’ prepared by the manager in terms of Chapter 15 of Master Circular for AIFs.

Our other resources:

  1. FAQs on Specific Due Diligence of investors & investments of AIFs
  2. AIFs ail SEBI: Cannot be used for regulatory breach
  3. RBI bars lenders’ investments in AIFs investing in their borrowers
  4. Some relief in RBI stance on lenders’ round tripping investments in AIFs