AIFs ail SEBI: Cannot be used for regulatory breach

Vinod Kothari | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

The alternative investment management industry in India works in the form alternative investment funds (AIFs), a SEBI-regulated vehicle. Most of the PE, VC funds, and hedge funds in India work in this mode.

AIFs have recently been at the receiving end of regulatory flak. RBI had expressed concerns on use of AIFs by regulated lenders for evergreening, and prohibited regulated entities from making any investment in such AIFs as have investments in their borrowers.

Now, SEBI, vide a Consultation Paper dated 19th January heaped a bunch of similar concerns, and required AIFs to affirm that the AIF or investments therein are not being used for regulatory breaches. These concerns, SEBI says, are a result of an ongoing thematic check on the AIF industry, and SEBI says it has already detected at least 40 cases, involving AUM over Rs 30000 crores, where the structure was used to create dents in existing financial regulations.

Based on Data relating to activities of Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs)

The AIF industry has demonstrated steady growth in recent years. As of September 2023, the assets under management (AUM) of AIFs have surged to 3.88 lakh crores, a substantial increase from the 13,000 crores recorded in September 2015. [See Graph above].   

Read more

Sustainability linked derivatives: An instrument with a potential

– Vinod Kothari, vinod@vinodkothari.com

Sustainability-linked loans and bonds have been surging globally. While there has been a dip in the recent periods (Q3 and Q4 of 2023) owing to tightening of regulatory conditions, the global volumes of sustainability-linked loans stood at around $ 400 billion[1].

However, there is another instrument – a derivative, which also has a linkage with sustainability targets, and that is making a global buzz. ISDA, having named this Sustainability Linked Derivatives or SLDs, is creating proper documentation basis to take this market forward. As of now, the market for SLDs is neither large nor highly standardised, but as credit defaults rose from nowhere and from a purely OTC product into being in the very thick of the global financial crisis, SLDs also merit close attention.

What is an SLD?

Think of usual derivatives in financial business – it will be an interest rate swap, or cross currency swap/FX forward. An SLD adds a sustainability-linked overlay on a typical IRS or FX hedge transaction.

For instance, assume Borrower X has taken a floating rate loan of $ 100 million, say at SOFR + 100 bps. X now hedges interest rate risk by entering into an IRS with Bank A, whereby Bank swaps this for a fixed rate of 4.5%.

Here, if we add an SLD overlay, Bank A will agree to provide a discount of, say 5 bps if X is able to meet certain specified sustainability KPIs. On the contrary, if X fails to meet the KPIs, then X pays a penalty of equal or a different amount. Depending on the agreement, the discount or penalty, or bonus/malus, may either be exchanged between the counterparties or by spent by either counterparty by way of a donation  for a sustainability cause.

Read more

LEAP to listing: India permits direct listing of shares overseas through IFSC

MCA & MOF notify rules for the same

– Vinita Nair & Prapti Kanakia | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Indian companies were permitted to raise funds from overseas either pursuant to issue of depository receipts listed overseas or having the non-residents subscribe to issuances made in India or by way of borrowing overseas. As an initiative to provide an avenue to access global capital markets, GoI had announced the decision to ease raising of foreign funds in order to boost foreign investment inflows, unlock growth opportunities and offer flexibility to Indian companies to raise funds. Consequently, an enabling provision for direct listing of prescribed class of securities on permitted stock exchanges in permissible foreign jurisdictions was inserted vide Companies (Amendment) Act, 2020 in Section 23 of Companies Act, 2013 (‘CA, 2013’), that deals with permissible modes of issue of securities, vide notification dated September 28, 2020 and made effective from October 30, 2023. Thereafter, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (‘MCA’) notified Companies (Listing of equity shares in permissible jurisdictions) Rules, 2024 (‘LEAP Rules’) effective from January 24, 2024. As listing of shares abroad will result in raising funds from persons resident outside India, Ministry of Finance (‘MoF’) notified FEMA (Non-Debt Instruments) Amendment Rules, 2024 amending FEMA (Non-Debt Instruments) Rules, 2019 (‘NDI Rules’) with effect from January 24, 2024. SEBI is also expected to roll out the operational guidelines for listed companies to list their equity shares on permitted stock exchanges.[1]

Additionally, FAQs on direct listing scheme (FAQs) have also been rolled out on January 24, 2024. Further, two of the key recommendations of the working group report on Direct Listing of Listed Indian Companies on IFSC Exchanges submitted in December 2023 was to notify the rules under Section 23 (3) and (4) of CA, 2013 and notify necessary amendments in NDI Rules to permit cross-jurisdiction issuance and trading of equity shares of Indian companies on IFSC exchanges.

Presently, both the LEAP Rules as well as NDI Rules have notified International Financial Services Centre in India (‘Gift City’) as the permissible jurisdiction and India International Exchange and NSE International Exchange as the permissible stock exchange. International Financial Services Centres Authority (‘IFSCA’) had issued the IFSCA (Issuance and Listing of Securities) Regulations, 2021 effective July 19, 2021 (‘IFSC Regulations’) however, in the absence of enabling provision under CA, 2013 and NDI Rules, Indian companies were unable to undertake listing of securities abroad.

In this article we provide an overview of the regulatory regime and deal with the procedural aspect.

Read more

Regulatory oversight over Self Regulatory Organisations in the Fintech Sector 

Analysis of the Draft Framework for Self Regulatory Organization(s) in the Fintech Sector

– Archisman Bhattacharjee, finserv@vinodkothari.com

Introduction

On January 15, 2023, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) published a draft Framework titled “Draft Framework for Self-Regulatory Organisation(s) in the Fintech Sector” (‘Framework’) with the objective of eliciting feedback and gauging stakeholder expectations. In this article we analyse the said Framework which in our view is targeted more towards the unregulated FinTech sector and recommend why an SRO should opt for a recognition from the RBI.

The FinTech sector is booming and is a market disruptor as well as facilitator, based on the report published by Inc42, the estimated market opportunity in India fintech is around $2.1 Tn+ and currently there are 23 FinTech “unicorns” with combined valuation of $74 Bn+ and 34 FinTech “soonicorns” with combined valuation of $12.7Bn+. 

The main functions of the FinTech sector includes providing solutions to Regulated Entities (REs) both as outsourced information technology providers as well as acting as lending services (such as customer acquisition, KYC task, servicing, etc.). The sector, however, not being under the direct supervision of the RBI may pose significant risks toward customer protection, data privacy, cyber security, grievance handling, internal governance, financial system integrity. In this respect the introduction of the Framework  of Self-Regulatory Organisation(s) in the FinTech Sector (SRO-Ft) remains a welcome move where the SRO-FT would act as an instrument of self-regulation for the market participants, which may include both regulated and unregulated entities, by coming out with its own policies, codes of conducts etc. which are aligned with the industry standards, best practices and expectations/ recommendations of the RBI and other sector regulators. However it should be noted that due to lack of legislation, the RBI does not have have any jurisdiction over the FinTech sector (Discussed in details in Section 2 of this Article) vis-a-vis their SRO, unless the SRO’s voluntarily submit to the jurisdiction of the RBI and the same has also been envisaged under Para 3 of the directions under the head “Introduction” of the draft Framework under discussion.

Read more

RBI (Commercial Paper and Non-Convertible Debentures of original or initial maturity upto one year) Directions, 2024

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [239.27 KB]

Harmonising computation for concentration limits across NBFCs

– Kaushal Shah, finserv@vinodkothari.com 

Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has recently announced amendments to the Credit and Investment concentration norms, specifically targeting Base and Middle Layer Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs). The circular, dated January 15, 2024, brings about notable changes aimed at ensuring uniformity and consistency across NBFCs while computing the concentration norms. 

What has RBI done?

For Middle Layer NBFCs (NBFC-MLs) :

  1. In addition to the use of Credit Default Swaps (‘CDS’), RBI has now allowed NBFC MLs to offset the aggregate exposure with the following additional Credit Risk Transfer (CRT) instruments: 
  • Cash margin/caution money/security deposit held as collateral on behalf of the borrower against the advances for which right to set off is available;

It is pertinent to note that, as per para 84 of the SBR Directions, already requires the NBFC for the purpose of assignment of risk weight to net off the amount of cash margin/ caution money/security deposits held as collateral against the advances out of the total outstanding exposure of the borrower. 

  • Central Government guaranteed claims which attract 0 per cent risk weight for capital computation;
  • State Government guaranteed claims which attract 20 per cent risk weight for capital computation; and 
  • Guarantees issued under Credit guarantee Schemes of Credit Guarantee Fund Trust for Micro and Small Enterprises, Credit Risk Guarantee Fund Trust for Low Income Housing and individual schemes under National Credit Guarantee Trustee Company Ltd
Read more

Decoding the New Norm

Framework for SROs for financial sector entities

-Srinithi Sreepathy | finserv@vinodkothari.com (Updated as on 29.03.2024)

On December 21, 2023, the Reserve Bank of India presented its first  ‘Draft Omnibus Framework for recognising Self-Regulatory Organisations for Regulated Entities’(‘Draft Omnibus Framework’) in pursuance of its Statement on Developmental and Regulatory Policies dated October 06, 2023. RBI subsequently finalized and issued the Omnibus Framework for  SROs on March 21, 2024.

The Omnibus Framework is in response to a vacuum located between Regulators and the ever-evolving industry dynamic. The RBI had proposed a draft and later finalised the framework, for Self-Regulatory Organisations (SROs) indicating a willingness to enter a collaborative approach to regulatory frameworks.

The Omnibus Framework, taking the increasing number of regulated entities and their growing scale of business into consideration recognises the lack of sufficient industry standards for self-regulation. Identifying this need and being aware of the futility of increasing the burden on regulatory bodies like the RBI, SEBI, or IRDA, (in this case, specifically: the RBI) the framework finds a middle ground by recognising self-regulation amongst members of various industry entities.

What are Self-Regulatory Organisations? What do they Do?

Self-Regulatory Organisations (SRO) are not-for-profit organisations that attempt to bridge the gap between regulation and industry-specific requirements.

Read more: Decoding the New Norm

In the Indian context, the most popular example remains the Association of Mutual Funds India, or the AMFI, an entity incorporated under Section 8 of the Companies Act 2013 as a not-for-profit organisation with the stated intent to act as a facilitator between the Regulatory Body of SEBI/RBI/the Government of India and the Mutual Fund ecosystem. It also aims at formulating standards or “best practices” which shall in turn become the industry status quo for all members to follow and live by. The AMFI also acts as a licensing body for all Mutual Fund distributors in India as per the duties assigned to it by the SEBI.[1] MFIN (Mutual Fund Investment Network) is another example of a successful SRO infrastructure in India. With the emergence of the FinTech Sector in India: Section 8 companies like FACE and DLAI have cropped up with both significant membership and the aim to establish industry standards and Codes of Conduct. The current omnibus[2] offers these institutions the opportunity to get regulatory sanction from the RBI.

The Omnibus Framework defines its intent by stating:

Self-Regulatory Organisations (SROs) enhance the effectiveness of regulations by drawing upon the technical expertise of practitioners and also aid in framing/ fine- tuning regulatory policies by providing inputs on technical & practical aspects, nuances and trade-offs involved. SROs can also help in fostering innovation, transparency, fair competition, and consumer protection. In sum, self-regulation shall complement the extant regulatory/ statutory framework for better compliance, in letter and spirit.”

To enable the SRO to fulfill the above obligations, the  Omnibus Framework gives power to the SROs to frame necessary standards or codes within the regulatory framework prescribed by RBI. The adoption of the code, however, should not be a substitution for adhering to the necessary RBI Regulations.

What is the purpose of an SRO? Why do they exist?

As per the Omnibus Framework, SROs are expected to primarily act as an interface between the regulatory body and regulated entities. Thus, one of their primary duties extends toward collecting and providing relevant industry-specific data[3] to the Reserve Bank to aid more efficient policy making. Apart from this SROs are also expected to foster greater research, promote compliance practices, ensure inclusive development and effectively act as an industry representative before the regulatory body.

SROs have certain general objectives, as well as specific responsibilities to be undertaken toward both its members as well as the RBI that gives it its credibility. Their responsibilities can be construed in a trifecta of general and specific duties, with specific duties being toward their members and the regulatory body to whom they represent their members. The Omnibus Framework defines “members” as the Regulated Entities which accept the membership of SRO.

Figure 1 SRO General Objectives

[Clause(s) 6 and 7 of the Omnibus Framework]

Through the establishment of “best practices” and industry benchmarks that may be emulated by most if not all entities in a particular industry and recognising that it may be impossible for the average pedestrian to undertake thorough due diligence independently, the SRO acts as a “stamp of approval” toward the validity and trustworthiness of a particular entity. To ensure that the SRO in itself is reliable, they may be subject to periodic audits by the regulatory body, and are also required to submit their annual reports to the Reserve Bank within three months of completion of the accounting year.

They are also required to frame a code of conduct that should be adhered to by their members, provide periodic sector-specific information through bulletins, pamphlets and magazines to increase awareness amongst its members, establish grievance redressal and dispute resolution mechanisms for its members and also educate the public about the grievance redressal mechanisms available to them. The Omnibus Framework allows the SROs to counsel, caution, reprimand, and expel the members as a consequence of violation of the code established by it. However, such consequences cannot result in the imposition of a monetary penalty on the member.

Figure 2: Responsibilities Towards Members and Regulators

Clause(s) 8 and 9

What are the eligibility criteria for forming an SRO?

Figure 3: Eligibility Criteria for SRO Recognition

Further, the Omnibus Framework specifies that the shareholding of an applicant should be sufficiently diversified. The applicant will not be eligible if an entity either singly or acting in concert holds 10% or more in the paid-up share capital of the applicant.

Who are the key stakeholders?

The RBI envisions the present omnibus primarily for entities regulated by the RBI. The SRO, once it receives its Letter of Recognition from the RBI will consequently impact the institutions/entities that comprise the sector it is representative of.

Thus, in the present context, some of the primary stakeholders are:

  1. Banking and Financial Institutions: As the RBI framework is directly impacting regulated entities, the Banking and Financial Institutions Sector becomes the primary stakeholders as they need to ensure compliance with the new standards.
  2. Industry Associations: As the Omnibus Framework aims to solemnise industry bodies and associations for responsible growth in the Financial Sector, these bodies will need to comply with the new framework. These bodies need to comply with the new standards as well as ensure that their members are similarly compliant. For e.g.:
    1. DLAI (Digital Lenders Association of India): Comprising over 80 members and involved in over $5 Billion in annual disbursements, DLAI’s stated objective remains the support of development and best practices in the Digital Lending Industry.
    2. FACE (FinTech Association for Consumer Empowerment): A Section 8 Company, stated to be a “Self-Regulatory industry body of fintech lenders” FACE aims to establish an ecosystem of responsible lending and borrowing.

Figure 4: Stakeholder Action Items

Regulated Entities are advised to proactively comply with emerging industry and governance standards, as well as emerging trends or shifts in interpretation of applicable guidelines/regulations/laws. It is recommended that REs promptly align with these standards, effectively articulate their challenges, and ensure full compliance to maintain industry integrity and operational excellence.

SRO Governance

To ensure a systemic and reliable mode of self-governance, and the ideal operational excellence envisioned above, the SRO in itself, must be reliable. Thus, SROs are subject to certain stringent governance standards.

Figure 5: SRO Governance Mechanism

The Omnibus Framework requires the Board of SROs to frame a policy on the rotation of directors for important positions in the Board of SROs.

How does an entity get recognised as an SRO?

For an entity to be recognised as an SRO it must receive a “Letter of Recognition” from the Reserve Bank. To receive the same, it is required that the SRO submit certain documents to the RBI including but not limited to: A copy of its Memorandum of Association and Articles of Association, details regarding the constitution of its board: its duties, and mode of discharge of obligations. It shall contain the roadmap to achieve minimum membership as prescribed by the RBI within prescribed timelines (which shall not be greater than two years from the date of recognition) and any such further documents as may be necessary. Whilst membership should ideally be achieved by the time of application itself, if not, a clear roadmap on achieving the requisite membership should be provided. The RBI may stipulate a timeline (not exceeding two years) within which this should be achieved.

Membership in SROs shall be voluntary for the members.

Application that does not fulfil criteria liable to be rejected. A fifteen day window, commencing from date of dispatch of intimation from RBI, will be provided to the applicant for rectification.

Figure 6: SRO Application Process

Way forward:

In summary, SROs are the necessary bridge between the regulatory body and the industry. They represent the industry to the regulatory body and interpret directions issued by the regulatory body to the industry so as to ensure consensus and uniformity in interpretation.

Whilst the Omnibus Framework is fairly comprehensive and takes most relevant factors into account, some clarifications and further considerations are required as presented herein:

  1. There is no specific provision as to how many SROs shall be recognised per sector/vertical. As the objective of the SRO is primarily to act as a facilitator between industry bodies, ensure consensus in interpretation and represent the interests of the industry before regulatory bodies, the objective may be defeated if the sector is populated by too many SROs. This issue warrants more comprehensive and detailed attention.
  2. The Omnibus Framework characterises the relationship between the SRO and RBI as an “allyship”. However, further clarification is necessary to define the specific terms and nature of this relationship.
  3. It is essential to clearly delineate the status of Section 8 Companies that undertake SRO functions but fail to secure recognition from the RBI, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of the implications and subsequent procedural actions.
  4. Introducing a mechanism whereby SROs shall grant accreditation to compliant members could also be beneficial and serve dual purposes: it would incentivise new members to join and simultaneously enhance the SRO’s credibility. This practice could also foster an atmosphere of competitive excellence in governance.
  5. It is also imperative that issues of conflict of interest are comprehensively and meticulously addressed to pre-empt potential challenges and maintain operational integrity

[1] However, it is to be noted that the current Omnibus does not make any specific mention of licensing activities that may be carried out by SROs in the future. At this stage it is difficult to predict whether licensing powers similar to AMFI will be granted to other SROs.

[2]  read with the RBI SRO-FT Framework

[3] Omnibus Framework for Recognizing Self-Regulatory Organizations for Regulated Entities, Page: 3


[1]

Housing finance companies regulatory framework: RBI proposes sectoral harmonisation

Chirag Agarwal, finserv@vinodkothari.com

The RBI has proposed changes in the regulations applicable to housing finance companies (HFCs). While larger part of these proposed changes will impact deposit-taking HFCs, there are some provisions and privileges, currently applicable to NBFCs only, which are being extended to HFCs as well. 

It may be recalled that the Finance Act, 2019 had moved the regulatory powers over HFCs to the RBI, whereas supervision remains with the NHB.  Accordingly, RBI vide its Press release dated August 13,2019 issued direction that HFCs will henceforth be treated as Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs) for regulatory purposes and RBI will carry out review of extant regulatory framework applicable to HFCs and come out with new revised regulations in due course. On October 22, 2020, the RBI issued a circular titled “Review of regulatory framework for Housing Finance Companies (HFCs)”, introducing a revised regulatory framework for HFCs. The circular emphasized the need for further harmonization between the regulations of HFCs and NBFCs over the next two years to ensure a smooth transition with minimal disruption. As part of this initiative, the RBI has released, on 15th January, 2024,  a draft circular titled “Draft circular on Review of regulatory framework for HFCs and harmonisation of regulations applicable to HFCs and NBFCs” for public comments. The objective is to streamline the regulations governing HFCs, aligning them more closely with the regulatory framework applicable to NBFCs. 

The proposed changes relate to both acceptance of deposits, and otherwise. Some of the proposed changes will be applicable to all HFCs. Below, we have provided a table comparing the guidelines applicable to NBFCs with the modifications proposed for HFCs to align them with the guidelines for NBFCs. Our point-wise analysis on the proposed changes is provided below: 

Read more

Corporate Governance: Miles Travelled and Miles to go

Register to our premium section to access the e-book

Book released on January 24, 2024

Access the official book launch video on our youtube channel

Inviting you to delve into a sweeping 700-pager book that unfolds the intricate tapestry of Corporate Governance as concept, providing a comprehensive and enlightening treatise on its evolution across diverse areas. Some of the salient features of this book are 

  • Runs over 700 pages of text, divided into 9 parts, consisting of 25 chapters.
  • Coverage of the complete ecosystem of corporate governance including the board and its committees, independent directors, auditors, proxy advisors, and shareholders. 
  • Extensive coverage of conflicts of interest which forms the major area of concern in corporate governance with detailed analysis of regulations on related party transactions.    
  • Covers information symmetry and corporate transparency as one of the key targets of effective corporate governance, with substantial coverage on insider trading and ensuring confidentiality and the flow of information from companies to the stock exchanges.
  • Several chapters are supported by extensive,well-classified FAQs.
  • Global coverage with an Indian focus, to allow readers to put the regulations into a wider context and understand international best practices.
  • Sustainability and business responsibility covering detailed analysis of obligations relating to ESG, climate change and directors’ liability for the same, sustainability financing, and CSR.
  • Use of technology in corporate governance like the use of AI in boardroom decisions.

In addition to the contents, the book has been designed in an e-book format to provide additional benefits to readers such as –

  • Hyperlinked text allowing access to the net resources
  • Eco-friendly, as we save paper and print
  • Cost effective -note that the subscription charges to our premium section are nominal, and not for this book but for all the materials/text that we put in the premium section
  • Reader’s ease of access – you may refer to the book using your handheld device, laptop, and at any point or place
  • Ease of searching and referencing – text search, string search capabilities of PDF versions may be deployed
  • Timely updations – we may, at intervals that we determine, update the text – therefore, you will be reading the last updated version, whereas print publications take long time to be revised. Notably, in the dynamic space of corporate governance, regulatory information itself may change frequently enough

Here’s a sneak peek into the contents of the book

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [760.52 KB]

Access Detailed Table of Contents – here

AGENDA – Felicitation meet-cum-Panel Discussion on Corporate Governance

Register Here for the Panel Discussion on Corporate Governance

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [144.04 KB]