Posts

Fair Lending: RBI bars several practices

Lenders asked to mend ways immediately

Team Finserv | finserv@vinodkothari.com

Introduction

If fairness lies in the eyes of the beholder, the RBI’s eye is getting increasingly customer-centric. This fiscal year, the RBI has issued circulars aimed at fostering fairness and transparency in lending practices; these come at the backdrop of circulars last year on penal interest, adjustable rates of interest, release of security interests, strengthening customer service by Credit Information Companies and Credit Institutions, and establishing a framework for compensating customers for delayed updation or rectification of credit information. Recently on April 15, 2024, the RBI introduced a circular on Key Facts Statement (KFS) for Loans & Advances, with the goal of enhancing transparency and reducing information asymmetry regarding financial products offered by various regulated entities. This initiative aims to empower borrowers to make well-informed financial decisions. 

A new Circular, dated 29th April 2024 Fair Practices Code for Lenders – Charging of Interest comes down on some of the practices related to computation of rates of interest by lenders. . This Circular is all about stopping lenders from doing things that aren’t fair when it comes to charging interest. 

Applicability

The Circular applies to a wide range of financial institutions including Banks, Co-operative Banks, NBFCs, and HFCs. It is worth noting that this Circular comes into effect immediately upon its issuance.

Practices observedRegulatory stipulation
Lenders charge interest from the date of execution of the loan, or the date of sanction, even though disbursement has not taken place as yetInterest may be charged only from the date of disbursement
Interest is charged from a particular date, even though it is clear that the cheque was handed over to the borrower several days after the said dateInterest may be charged from the date when the cheque is handed over to the borrower
In some cases, one or more EMIs were received in advance; however, the interest was computed on the loan amount, without considering the advance paymentInterest shall be charged after netting off the advance EMI from the disbursement amount

Our analysis:

  • Loan agreement in place, but disbursement has not happened:
    • If the lender has sanctioned a loan, but the disbursement has not happened, can the lender charge a commitment charge for the period upto disbursement?
      • In our view, the sanction amounts to a committed lending. Committed lending has liquidity implications for the lender, and also eats up regulatory capital. Therefore, it is quite okay for a lender to start charging commitment charge from the date of sanction till the date of disbursement, provided the same is clear in the KFS/terms of the loan.
    • If the disbursement does not happen for a particular period of time, can the lender revoke the sanction?
      • Yes, if the same is clear in the terms of the loan
  • Interest to commence from the date of the disbursement:
    • What is the meaning of the date of disbursement? The funds actually leaving the bank account of the lender, or the cheque handed over?
      • Usually, handing over of a cheque is a common mode of making payments (unless the payments are being made in online mode – see below). Therefore, if there is an evidence of the cheque being handed over, the lender accounts for the disbursement from that date. If the cheque is not encashed, it appears as a reconciliation item. In our view it is okay to relate the date of handing over a cheque to the date of disbursement (assuming the cheque is good for immediate banking; it is not post-dated and subsequently does not bounce).
    • The RBI expects lenders to move to online modes of disbursement. What are the online modes of disbursement that are acceptable?
      • Disbursement through UPI
      • Disbursement to the bank account
      • Electronic Clearing System
      • Lender cannot transfer to a PPI wallet
  • Advance EMIs to be considered while computing interest:
    • Advance EMIs should be captured while computing EMIs. If the EMIs are being collected in “advance” mode, rather than arrears, standard worksheet formulae (PMT) allows for advance EMIs to be considered. There is no further need to net off the advance EMI from the disbursement. For computing amortisation, the interest will be computed on the loan amount, minus the EMI
    • Does the advance EMI also have an interest component?
      • Yes. EMIs is an equated amount, payable through the term of the loan. Each EMI consists of interest and principal. The only difference is that while computing the EMIs, the disbursement was taken as net of the first EMI. That is to say, there is an interest component in the first EMI, but the interest is on the amount remaining after the first EMI. 

Applicability date and scope

  • The circular as above is immediately applicable. Does it apply to existing loans too?
    • Each of the practices referred to above are treated by the regulator as unfair. It is not as if these were fair all this while and become unfair from a particular date. In fact, the Circular also says that the regulator during supervisory inspections has directed lenders to refund the excess interest if collected. Therefore, in our view, each of the above stipulations are applicable on all loans.
  • Is the circular applicable only on “retail loans” as covered by Key Facts Statement (KFS) for Loans & Advances circular, or does it apply to all loans?
    • Coming from basic considerations of fairness, in our view, the Circular is applicable to all loans.

Actionables 

  • REs to check whether the interest is being calculated from the date of actual disbursement rather than from the date of sanction of loan.
  • REs to review their modes of disbursal of loans and to use online account transfers in lieu of cheques. In cases where loan is disbursed through cheques, we recommend REs take an acknowledgement when the cheque is handed over to the borrower
  • REs to check whether they have received any intimation from RBI regarding the refund of any excess interest charged.

Related articles

  1. The Key to Loan Transparency : RBI frames KFS norms for all retail and MSME loans
  2. FAQs on Digital Lending Regulations 
  3. FAQs on Penal Charges in Loan Accounts 
  4. RBI streamlines floating rate reset for EMI-based personal loans

Allow borrowers to make free choice: RBI draft rules for digital loan aggregators

Manisha Ghosh l manisha.ghosh@vinodkothari.com

In a move aimed at fostering transparency and consumer-centric practices in digital lending, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) issued draft guidelines for digital loan aggregators on 26th April, 2024  titled ‘Digital Lending – Transparency in Aggregation of Loan Products from Multiple Lenders’. Comments are due on the same.  This regulatory framework underscores the importance of empowering borrowers with complete information during the credit process to make an informed decision.

Read more

Webinar on KFS & APR – New Rules by RBI on Retail & MSME Lending

-Vinod Kothari and Anita Baid | finserv@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [1.31 MB]

Our related resources on the topic:

  1. The Key to Loan Transparency : RBI frames KFS norms for all retail and MSME loans
  2. Transparency in lending: RBI Mandates KFS for Retail and MSME Loans
  3. RBI Regulations on Digital Lending

Credit Underwriting Models: Need for Validation

– Team Finserv, finserv@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [284.12 KB]


Other related resources:

  1. Crowdfunding platforms – risks and concerns in the Indian context
  2. Commercial Real Estate exposures: Lending risks and Regulatory focus
  3. NBFC- Enterprise Risk Assessment
  4. Compliance Risk Assessment
  5. Understanding ICAAP for NBFCs
  6. KYC/AML risk categorisation of customers

Introducing Financial Services on ONDC: Opportunities & Challenges for Digital Lenders

– Shreshtha Barman | finserv@vinodkothari.com

Read more

Digital Personal Data Protection Bill 2023:  Analysing the Impact on Digital Lenders

– Subhojit Shome, Assistant Manager | subhojit@vinodkothari.com

Click here to view our: Consultancy and advisory services on Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [1.44 MB]

Watch our Shastrartha on Digital Personal Data Protection Bill, 2023 – Analysing the impact on financial sector lender

Workshop on Regulatory Framework for New-age NBFCs

Register Here : https://forms.gle/C2DQCp5BrAGu9Nry5
Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [267.25 KB]

Rise, Fall & Subsequent Legitimisation of Default Loss Guarantees

Anita Baid & Subhojit Shome | finserv@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [368.75 KB]

Read our FAQs on Default Loss Guarantee in Digital Lending

FAQs on Default Loss Guarantee in Digital Lending

An understanding of the Guidelines issued by RBI

Team Finserv | finserv@vinodkothari.com

On September 02, 2022, the RBI issued the “Guidelines on Digital Lending” (“DL Guidelines”), which had essentially put a bar on “Loss sharing/ structured default guarantee arrangements” such as First Loss Default Guarantees, likening their nature to that of “synthetic securitisation” as defined under the Master Direction – Reserve Bank of India (Securitisation of Standard Assets) Directions, 2021 (“SSA Directions”). This caused a disruption in the digital lending industry as most of the arrangements ran on some form of loss-sharing arrangement. (Refer to our FAQs on the Digital Lending Guidelines here)

In its Statement on Developmental and Regulatory Policies dated June 8, 2023, the RBI announced its intention to issue a regulatory framework for permitting Default Loss Guarantee arrangements in Digital Lending[1]. The same day, the Guidelines on Default Loss Guarantee (DLG) in Digital Lending have been issued by the regulator (‘DLG Guidelines’).

Read more

Digital lending Balloon: Navigating the path to growth

-Dayita Kanodia, Executive finserv@vinodkothari.com

“Ignoring technological change in a financial system based upon technology is like a mouse starving to death because someone moved their cheese.” – Chris Skinner[1]

Unprecedented growth of the sector

From pawnbrokers lending money in exchange for collateral to the use of sophisticated technologies to carry out credit underwriting, the landscape of lending business has evolved significantly in the last century. Today, it is hard to find a financial institution which is carrying on business without digitising any aspect of its lending process. With rapid advancements in cloud computing, artificial intelligence, and blockchain, as well as faster and more affordable internet connectivity, it is safe to say that the brick and mortar model for lending business will soon be a matter of the past.

The Global Digital Lending Market is valued at USD 11.33 Billion in the year 2022 and is anticipated to reach a value of USD 30.77 Billion by the year 2030. [2]

Read more