Designated to reveal beneficiary identity: all companies mandated to name one

– MCA requires every company to designate person responsible for providing information with respect to beneficial interest in shares 

– Payal Agarwal, Senior Manager | corplaw@vinodkothari.com 

The concept of “beneficial owner” or BO is well-established under the Companies Act, 2013 by way of section 89 and 90 read with the rules made thereunder. The primary onus of declaration of beneficial interest lies on the person holding such beneficial interest. For the purpose of assigning responsibility to one or more person with respect to the compliance with the said provisions, Rule 9 of the Companies (Management and Administration) Rules, 2014 (“MGT Rules”) has been amended vide the Companies (Management and Administration) (Second Amendment) Rules, 2023 introducing the concept of “designated person” for the purpose of the said section. The amendment has been notified and made applicable from the date of its publication in the official gazette, i.e, 27th October, 2023. 

Functions of a designated person

The concept of “designated person” has been brought in vide sub-rule (4) of Rule 9 of the MGT Rules. It requires “every company” to designate a person to be responsible for “furnishing, and extending co-operation for providing, information to the Registrar or any other authorised officer with respect to beneficial interest in shares of the company.” Therefore, a person, identified as a designated person under this rule, would be expected to be aware of, and therefore, take all reasonable steps to become aware, of the person holding “beneficial interest” in the shares of the company. 

The applicability of the requirement to identify a designated person is not limited only to such companies that have received declarations with respect to “beneficial interest”, but extends to every company. It is upon the ROC/ other authorities to seek information with respect to beneficial interest from any company, and any such information, as and when sought, will be required to be provided by the designated person identified under this rule. 

Who can be a designated person? 

Sub-rule (5) of Rule 9 deals with the person qualified to be a designated person. It requires one of the following to act as a “designated person”: 

  1. CS of the company, if the company is required to appoint a CS (as per section 203 of the Act), or 
  2. any KMP of the company (as defined u/s 2(51) of the Act), or
  3. every director of the company, in case the company does not have a CS or other KMPs. 

Therefore, a company may, acting through its board of directors, preferably through a duly passed board resolution in this regard, designate the CS, or any of the KMPs or directors of the company to act as a designated person. The use of the term “every director” does not imply that all directors shall be identified as “designated person”, rather, it would mean that either of the directors can be designated under the aforesaid rule. 

“Deemed” designated person 

The provisions are applicable immediately, and therefore, till the time a company designates a person for compliance with the aforesaid, the following persons shall be deemed to be designated person: 

  1. CS of the company, if the company is required to appoint a CS (as per section 203 of the Act)
  2. In case a CS has not been appointed, every Managing Director or Manager of the company, 
  3. In the absence of both (a) and (b), every director of the company. 

Disclosure of details of a designated person 

The details of the designated person are required to be disclosed in the annual return. The annual return is an e-form filed with ROC, and the present change would require a modification in the existing format so as to facilitate the provision of such information. Further, since the provisions are applicable from 27th October, 2023, the disclosure should be applicable for the annual return filed for FY 23-24 and onwards. 

Any changes in the designated person is also required to be intimated to the ROC in e-form GNL-2. No timeline has been specified for filing the same, but should be filed within a reasonable period of time. 

The introduction of the concept of “designated person” with respect to the “beneficial interest” in the shares of a company, will have the impact of assigning responsibility and accountability on the designated person with respect to compliance with the provisions of the Act relating to beneficial interest. Recently, many companies have received advisories from the ministry to ensure compliance with the provisions of declaration of beneficial ownership, and the present amendment would act as a “single point assistance” to the authorities in their inspection of companies with respect to compliance with declaration of “beneficial interest”. 

You may also refer to our Snippet and YouTube video

Our other resources on beneficial owners can be accessed here –

  1. Registered Owner V. Beneficial Owner – A Curtain raiser
  2. SBO Declaration: Whose Responsibility Is It Anyways?
  3. MCA revisits SBO Rules
  4. Article corner on SBO

Recent regulatory developments for listed entities – critical changes under LODR and PIT Regulations

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [1.02 MB]

Stricter framework for sale, lease or disposal of undertaking by a listed entity

– Nitu Poddar | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Reg 37A of Listing Regulations requires additional voting and disclosure requirements

The article was also published by IndiaCorpLaw and can be viewed here

Disposal of an undertaking (whole or substantially the whole) can be done either as part of a scheme of arrangement or otherwise by way of slump sale / business transfer agreement (‘BTA’). Disposal, other than by way of scheme of arrangement, have so far been regulated as per section 180(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013 (‘Act’) which requires approval of the shareholders by way of special resolution. SEBI has prescribed approval requirement in this regard by way of introduction of regulation 37A vide SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) (Second Amendment) Regulations, 2023 (‘Amendment Regulations’) effective from June 14, 2023 that requires listed entities to follow a stricter regime for disposal of undertaking inter alia mandating approval from majority of the public shareholders who are not interested in the transaction, disclosure of the object, commercial rationale and use of proceeds arising from such transaction. While there is an exemption provided in case of transactions with a wholly owned subsidiary (WOS), the approval regime will apply in case of disposal of undertaking by such WOS or any reduction in shareholding in the WOS subsequent to transfer of the undertaking.

The said amendment is based on the Consultation Paper rolled by SEBI on February 21, 2023. Apart from incorporating the provisions proposed in this regard in the Consultation Paper, the amendment has introduced new provisions as well. Provision with respect to seeking approval from the shareholders of the listed entity in case a WOS is used as a conduit for transfer in undertaking is a new requirement brought in through the amendment.

Read more

Understanding CSR for NGO

– Pammy Jaiswal, Partner | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [650.02 KB]

Entering in FY 23-24: Regulatory review of corporate law developments

– Payal Agarwal, Deputy Manager (payal@vinodkothari.com)

As the new financial year 23-24 commences, we look back at where we stand at the end of FY 22-23, in terms of the regulatory developments. While there has been no substantial traffic in terms of regulatory developments to the Companies Act, the migration of various forms in MCA’s V3 portal proved to be (and still continues to be so in some cases) a turmoil, with a standstill in the fundraising process, and other practical difficulties, even resulting in levy of additional fines. 

There has been significant traction on the part of SEBI too. While Structured Digital Database (SDD) remained the buzzword for the listed entities with the stock exchanges requiring them to submit quarterly compliance certificates, the stress for proper controls on insider trading remained the focal point. Having stiffed the nerves of the Compliance Officers in the listed entities through the quarterly compliance certificates, the same has been finally absorbed in the annual secretarial compliance reports under the Listing Regulations.

Read more

Directors to declare on personal disqualifications too in DIR-8

– Prapti Kanakia, Manager | prapti@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [166.84 KB]

2022 Wrapped Up: Regulatory review of corporate law developments

– Payal Agarwal, Assistant Manager (payal@vinodkothari.com)

2022 has been a relatively stable year when it comes to Companies Act, save changes in the forms and filing procedures with increasing online processes, there has been significant traction on the part of SEBI. While Structured Digital Database (SDD) remained the buzzword for the listed entities with the stock exchanges requiring them to submit quarterly compliance certificates, the stress for proper controls on insider trading remained the focal point. For social enterprises, a landmark development was the introduction of the concept of Social Stock Exchanges, which seems to be shortly getting into operational mode.

We have tried to briefly cover the major developments in corporate laws during the year 2022. You may also refer to our brief discussion of the same in this youtube video. For updates relevant to the financial sector including the overseas investment norms, refer 2022 in retrospect: Regulatory activity in the financial sector. You may also refer to our quick round-up of regulatory developments in IBC in the year 2022.

Read more

CSR Rules tweaked to rationalize committee constitution, implementing agencies etc

– Nitu Poddar, Partner | Lovish Jain, Executive | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

MCA vide its notification dated September 20, 2022 has made amendments in the Companies (Corporate Social Responsibility Policy) Rules, 2014 (“Rules”). The said amendment seeks to do away with the redundant requirements in Rule 3(2) of making CSR expenditure and other compliances even after the companies cease to be covered within the thresholds under section 135(1), provide for continuation of CSR committee in case of amount lying in the unspent CSR account, amend the scope of implementing agencies and in the ceiling of expenditure towards impact assessment as well as some changes in the annual report on CSR.

Read more

Definition of Small Company – Evolution over time

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as pdf [301.04 KB]

New avatar of DPT-3 requires aging details for exempted deposits

– Also burdened with irrelevant deposit related details

– Payal Agarwal, Senior Executive (payal@vinodkothari.com)

The format of the “return on deposits” and on “exempted deposits”, that is, form DPT-3  has been amended pursuant to  the notification of the Companies (Acceptance of Deposit) Amendment Rules, 2022 (“Amendment Rules”) on 29th August, 2022. While the same has been made applicable immediately, the revised format will be actually relevant for the filing of form DPT-3 for FY 2022-23, since the due date for filing DPT-3 for FY 2021-22 has already expired on 30th June, 2022. It is interesting to note that while most of the changes pertain to the “return of deposits”, the same does not have any practical significance in India. However, there is specifically one addition w.r.t. the money received by a company, but not considered as deposit, i.e., exempted deposits. 

Read more