Posts

Demand and call loans: Economics and regulatory considerations

Vinod Kothari | finserv@vinodkothari.com

From lenders’ perspective, demand and call loans seem to be as liquid as money in a bank fixed deposit, and yet an option to earn substantially higher interest rates. The practice of demand loans exists in the financial marketplace; at the same time, it is often commonplace in the case of intra-group loans. However, there are various risks, considerations and regulatory implications in case of such lending.

This article goes beyond Reg. 28 of the Scale Based Regulations of the RBI and discusses economics, policy issues, liquidity and credit risk considerations, both for the lender and the borrower, as well as issues like NPA treatment, expected credit losses, etc.

What is a demand/call loan?

The word “call money” is typically used in the banking sector for very short-term loans, which are callable at any time by the lender. Demand loan is a term usually associated with longer-term loans, though with no fixed repayment date, that is to say, the loan may be demanded back by the lender at any time. The following features of demand/call loans are discernible:

  • There is no fixed repayment date, but that does not mean there is no outer date for seeking repayment of the loan at all. For example, the terms of the loan may say – the lender may seek repayment of the loan at any time; however, if any earlier repayment is not demanded by the lender, the loan will be repaid on its 1st anniversary. Hence, there is an outer date, subject to the possibility of the lender demanding repayment at any time.
  • Given its nature, the loan is also puttable by the borrower, that is, repayable by the borrower at the borrower’s instance. It does not seem logical to impose a prepayment penalty for earlier voluntary repayment by the borrower.
  • Does the demand loan have to be repaid immediately upon demand? Except in the case of call loans which are very short-term loans by nature, a demand loan may provide a certain number of days after demand, for example, 14 days after demand is made by the lender.
  • Can the repayment of the loan be demanded by the lender partially? The answer seems to be affirmative; of course, the borrower may repay the whole of the loan.
  • The principal amount of the loan is payable on demand; how about the interest? The interest should still be serviced regularly. Reg 28.2 (iv) and (v) expect interest to be serviced monthly or quarterly, unless the sanctioning authority records a reason for not insisting on regular interest service.
  • In demand loans, liquidity evaluation is as equally as important as the credit evaluation of the borrower. This is quite obvious, because however strong the financial position of the borrower, if the borrower does not have access to ready sources of liquidity, he will not be able to pay on demand.
Read more

Online Workshop on Regulatory Concerns on Fair Lending Practices and KYC

Register here: https://forms.gle/cQ3RYWAwhqd3hqTs7
Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [370.96 KB]

Our resources on KYC can be accessed here.

Our resources on SBR:

Consolidated NBFC Regulations for all Scales and Functions

– Anita Baid, Vice President | anita@vinodkothari.com

Updated as on 09.11.2023

The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has issued a notification outlining a new regulatory framework for Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs) on October 19, 2023 (‘SBR Framework’). The RBI has played a crucial role in regulating the NBFC sector over the years. With the sector’s evolution and changing dynamics, the regulator has been proactive in amending regulations. Previously, NBFCs were classified into two categories: systemically important and non-systemically important. However, starting from October 2022, the RBI introduced a new classification system based on layers: base, middle, upper, and top.

The reclassification introduced some progressive changes but also created certain ambiguities in the applicability of regulatory rules. Specifically, the terms “base layer” and “middle layer” were related with non-systemically important (non-SI) and systemically important (SI) NBFCs. When classifying NBFCs based on asset size, those with assets under Rs. 500 crores were considered non-SIs, while those with assets over Rs. 500 crores were classified as SIs.

However, the SBR Framework introduced a different set of criteria. According to this framework, NBFCs with assets less than Rs. 1000 crores are categorized as Base Layer entities, while those with assets exceeding Rs. 1000 crores are classified as Middle Layer entities. This creates a gray area for NBFCs with assets falling between Rs. 500 crores and Rs. 1000 crores.

To address this issue and provide a more streamlined regulatory framework, the RBI has issued the Master Direction – Reserve Bank of India (Non-Banking Financial Company – Scale Based Regulation) Directions, 2023 (‘SBR Master Directions’).

The SBR Master Direction, effective immediately, intends to consolidate the various regulations for NBFCs of different scales and functions in one place. The consolidation has streamlined various regulations issued under the SBR Framework governing the different layers of NBFCs. It brings clarity to compliance requirements and ensures that all NBFCs operate within a framework that is consistent and transparent. The SBR Master Directions is divided into sections for different categories of NBFCs, based on size as well as function:

  1. Regulations for Base Layer;
  2. Regulations for Middle Layer (this would be in addition to the regulations for BL);
  3. Regulations for Upper Layer (this would be in addition to the regulations for BL and ML);
  4. Regulations for Top Layer (to be specifically communicated upon classification in TL);
  5. Specific Directions for MFIs this is in addition to the regulations based on layers);
  6. Specific Directions for Factors and NBFCs registered under Factoring Act (this is in addition to the regulations based on layers);
  7. Specific Directions for IDFs (this is in addition to the regulations based on layers).

Further, the specific regulations issued by the RBI would still be relevant and continue to be applicable for Housing Finance Companies, Core Investment Companies, NBFC-P2P, NBFC-Account Aggegator, deposit taking NBFCs, Residuary Non-Banking Companies, Mortgage Guarantee Companies and  Asset Reconstruction Companies. Additionally, based on the classification under the SBR Framework (BL or ML), the relevant provisions of the SBR Master Directions shall be applicable. 

Previously, under the SBR notification dated October 22, 2021, the RBI clarified that all references to NBFC-ND (non-systemically important non-deposit taking NBFC) would now be referred to as NBFC-BL, and all references to NBFC-D (deposit-taking NBFC) and NBFC-ND-SI (systemically important non-deposit taking NBFC) would be known as NBFC-ML or NBFC-UL, depending on the case.

Furthermore, it specified that existing NBFC-ND-SI with asset sizes of ₹ 500 crore and above but below ₹1000 crore (except those necessarily categorized as Middle Layer) would be reclassified as NBFC-BL.

However, upon an initial review of the SBR Master Directions, it appears that certain guidelines that were typically applicable to NBFC-SI and should logically apply to NBFC-ML are explicitly retained for NBFCs with asset sizes exceeding ₹ 500 crores. Here is a list of such guidelines:

  1. Prudential Framework for Resolution of Stressed Assets dated June 07, 2019, as amended from time to time would be applicable on all NBFCs-D and non-deposit taking NBFCs of asset size of ₹500 crore and above. It may be noted that there are specific norms for restructuring of advances by non-deposit taking NBFCs with asset size less than ₹500 crore
  2. Non-Cooperative Borrowers identification shall be done by all NBFC-Factors, NBFCs-D and non-deposit taking NBFCs of asset s.ize of ₹500 crore and above.
  3. Refinancing of Project Loans to any existing infrastructure and other project loans by non-deposit taking NBFCs with asset size less than ₹500 crore.
  4. Framework for Revitalizing Distressed Assets in the Economy shall apply to non-deposit taking NBFCs with asset size less than ₹500 crore.
  5. Early Recognition of Stress and Reporting to Central Repository of Information on Large Credits (CRILC) reporting by all NBFC-Factors, NBFC-D and non-deposit taking NBFCs of asset size of ₹500 crore and above. 

As the financial landscape continues to evolve, the RBI’s proactive approach ensures that the NBFC sector remains well-updated. 

Upon further perusal of the SBR Master Directions, it can be noticed that there are certain regulations that were issued under the SBR Framework that have not been consolidated, such as follows:

  1. Compliance Function and Role of Chief Compliance Officer (CCO) – NBFCs
  2. Implementation of ‘Core Financial Services Solution’ by Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs)

Further, there are specific master directions on information technology framework, fraud reporting, etc. that have not been consolidated. It may also be noted that para 4.2 clarifies that the SBR Master Directions consolidate the regulations as issued by Department of Regulation (DoR); any other directions/guidelines issued by any other Department of the RBI, as applicable to an NBFC shall continue to be adhered to. Accordingly, the aforesaid regulations that were issued by the Department of Supervision (DoS) or Department of Non-Banking Supervision (DNBS) have not been consolidated and are neither listed in the Repeal Section of the SBR Master Directions. There does not seem to be any reason for the aforesaid regulations to be repealed, and hence, it seems that only those circulars and notifications that are issued by the DoR have been considered while compiling the regulations, including those introduced under the SBR Framework. Considering that there are standalone notifications on the aforesaid issued by the DoS or DNBS, therefore, the said regulations should also continue to be applicable.


Our YouTube Series realting to the topic: Tattva

Our Resources on SBR can be accessed here:

Workshop on Regulatory Framework for New-age NBFCs

Register Here : https://forms.gle/C2DQCp5BrAGu9Nry5
Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [267.25 KB]

Base Layer NBFCs amenable to NSI or SI regulations?

Rhea Shah, Executive | finserv@vinodkothari.com

Background

Prior to the implementation of the SBR Framework, NBFCs were classified into Systemically Important (SI) and Non-Systemically Important (NSI) on the basis of the overall risk involved in their operations and the economic importance of the operations that they undertake. NBFCs with asset size upto 500 crores were classified as NSI, and those with Rs. 500 crores and above, were classified as SI and are respectively governed by Master Direction – Non-Banking Financial Company – Non-Systemically Important Non-Deposit taking Company (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2016[1] (‘NSI Directions’) and Master Direction – Non-Banking Financial Company – Systemically Important Non-Deposit taking Company and Deposit taking Company (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2016[2] (‘SI Directions’). Besides, there are certain other directions [e.g. Master Direction – Monitoring of Frauds in NBFCs (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2016[3]], which are applicable to NBFC-SIs and not NBFC-NSI. Even the return filing requirements differ for NBFC-SIs and NBFC-NSIs.

Read more

In-house Training on SBR Framework for NBFC-ML/UL

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [768.81 KB]

Workshop on Emerging Regulatory Framework for NBFCs and digital lending

Register here: https://forms.gle/D7QTKbPDcZn3AP7y6
Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [376.81 KB]

Our resources on the topics:

Differential Standard Asset Provisioning for NBFC-UL

-RBI issues new guidelines on provisioning for standard assets

-Kumari Kirti | finserv@vinodkothari.com

The function of NBFCs as a supplemental route of credit intermediation alongside banks and its contribution to supporting real economic activity are well known. Within the financial sector, the NBFCs have grown significantly in terms of scale, complexity, and interconnectedness over time. Many companies have expanded to the point where they are systemically significant, necessitating the alignment of the regulatory framework for NBFCs in light of their shifting risk profile.

To address the same, RBI vide its circular dated October 22, 2021[1] has introduced Scale Based Regulation (SBR) for all NBFCs and has classified NBFCs in four layers- Base, Middle, Upper and Top layer.

Read more