Posts

RBI Framework for Green Deposits

/0 Comments/in , , , , /by

– Team Finserv | finserv@vinodkothari.com

Climate change is clearly one of the most pertinent regulatory themes in recent times, as the move to sustainable business practices and energy efficient technologies need massive funding.  The availability of finance for move to sustainability has an important role to play in mitigating climate change. To this effect, RBI also conducted a survey in January 2022 to assess the status of climate risk and sustainable finance in leading scheduled commercial banks, and observed a need for concerted effort and further action in this regard. Following the same, RBI conducted a discussion, and released a press release indicating its intention to release a framework for acceptance of green deposits in India. On 11th April, 2023, RBI released the Framework for Acceptance of Green Deposits (“Framework”) for banks and deposit-taking NBFCs/HFCs, to be applicable from 1st June, 2023.

Our video lecture on the topic is available here: https://youtu.be/7rRhVYR-zT0

As the green deposits formally mark its presence in the Indian financial markets, one may be inquisitive on various aspects related to it. We have tried to analyze and put our views on the same in this write-up.

The Green Deposit Framework
Banks and deposit-taking NBFCs/HFCs may raise green deposits, in accordance with the Framework, from 1st June, 2023
Money raised by Green deposits to be deployed only for “green finance”; India’s taxonomy for the same to be developed. In the meantime, a list of eligible green activities/ projects has been announced, in line with SEBI’s definition of green bonds under NCS Regulations
Third party assessment/verification of use of proceeds mandatory
Impact assessment to be optional for FY 23-24, and mandatory from FY 24-25
Disclosure of green deposits and utilization in the annual financial statements
Read more →

Private sector banks to continuously monitor major shareholders

/0 Comments/in , /by

RBI Directions, 2023 require banks to have a mechanism to detect violation w.r.t. RBI prior approval and ‘fit and proper’ status

– Vinita Nair, Senior Partner | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Given their systemic significance, ensuring that ownership of banks neither gets concentrated, nor falls into wrong hands, has always been important. Therefore, acquisition of shares or voting rights (‘S/VR’) is strictly regulated by Section 12B of Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (‘BR Act’), supplemented by RBI Directions issued from time to time. In the case of public sector banks, there is a ceiling of 10% of the total voting rights for shareholders other than the Central Government.

Section 12B of BR Act prescribes the requirement of prior approval of RBI in case of a person intending to become a “major shareholder”, that is, a holder with 5% of the S/VR in a banking company. The requirement is applicable where a person acquires or agrees to acquire S/VR, which could be (a) either directly or indirectly, and (b) whether alone, or  by acting in concert with any other person. Hence, there is a need to do both horizontal aggregation [that is, relatives[1] and persons acting in concert (PAC)[2]], as well as vertical aggregation (that is, indirect acquisition through controlled entities or “associated enterprises[3]”.

This article discusses the possible pain points likely to be faced by the banks, other requirements under the new regime and actionable arising therefrom.

Read more →

PML Act and Rules: Recent changes may have new compliance requirements

/1 Comment/in , , , /by

-Team Finserv | finserv@vinodkothari.com

Background

Financial sector entities have to follow PMLA and related rules, including by way of KYC Directions. The Finance Ministry came up with various amendments pertaining to the Prevention of Money-Laundering Act, 2002 (“PML Act”) and the Prevention of Money-Laundering (Maintenance of Records) Rules, 2005 (‘PML Rules’). The amendments pertain to revised thresholds for ascertainment of beneficial ownership (25% to 10%), implementation of group wide policies for compliance with provisions of Chapter IV, expanding the obligations under PMLA to service providers of virtual digital assets, etc.

Effective date and applicability:

The amendment shall be effective from the same date, i.e. March 07, 2023. It may be noted that the Master Direction – Know Your Customer (KYC) Direction, 2016  (‘KYC Directions’) are issued and updated by the regulator based on the amendment in PML Act and PML Rules. However, the Regulated Entities (RE) are required to ensure compliance with the provisions of PML Act and PML Rules, as amended from time to time. Hence, necessary steps must be taken based on the amendments.

Whether applicable to existing or new customers?

Customer Due Diligence (as required under the PML Act and Rules) is required to be undertaken at the time of commencement of a financial transaction or account-based relationship with the customer. Accordingly, necessary steps must be taken by the RE to ensure compliance with the Amendment Rules for all new customers or new financial transactions undertaken with existing customers after March 07, 2023. However, it is also pertinent to note rule 9(12) of the PML Rules which requires reporting entities to exercise continuous due diligence with respect to the business relationship with every clients.

Read more →

Base Layer NBFCs amenable to NSI or SI regulations?

/1 Comment/in , , , /by

Rhea Shah, Executive | finserv@vinodkothari.com

Background

Prior to the implementation of the SBR Framework, NBFCs were classified into Systemically Important (SI) and Non-Systemically Important (NSI) on the basis of the overall risk involved in their operations and the economic importance of the operations that they undertake. NBFCs with asset size upto 500 crores were classified as NSI, and those with Rs. 500 crores and above, were classified as SI and are respectively governed by Master Direction – Non-Banking Financial Company – Non-Systemically Important Non-Deposit taking Company (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2016[1] (‘NSI Directions’) and Master Direction – Non-Banking Financial Company – Systemically Important Non-Deposit taking Company and Deposit taking Company (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2016[2] (‘SI Directions’). Besides, there are certain other directions [e.g. Master Direction – Monitoring of Frauds in NBFCs (Reserve Bank) Directions, 2016[3]], which are applicable to NBFC-SIs and not NBFC-NSI. Even the return filing requirements differ for NBFC-SIs and NBFC-NSIs.

Read more →

Liquidity stress testing for NBFCs

/0 Comments/in , , , /by

– Vinod Kothari

finserv@vinodkothari.com

Stress testing is a part of risk management process. Stress testing envisages those plausible, however, low frequency events, which may occur and disrupt the operations. In the context of a financial intermediary – stress may be seen either in the solvency (that is, capital is not sufficient to absorb the risks or losses), or liquidity (that is, the bank is perfectly solvent, and yet, does not have enough liquidity to discharge immediate liability).

The need for stress testing comes from para 15A (para 15 for non-systemically important NBFCs) read with Annex II of the Master Directions for NBFCs[1] which provide as follows:

Read more →

The Dos and Don’ts of Penal Charges

/0 Comments/in , , , , /by

RBI to release guidelines on penal charges 

– Tejasvi Thakkar, Executive | finserv@vinodkothari.com

Introduction 

The Reserve Bank of India (‘RBI’) announced various policy measures in its Statement on Developmental and Regulatory Policies dated February 08, 2023, which includes introduction of guidelines for regulating the penal charges levied by financial institutions in case of delay or default in repayment of loans or where there is a non-compliance of ‘material’ terms and conditions. RBI observed that some of the financial institutions were levying unreasonable penal charges. It has time and again been RBI’s concern that financial institutions levy excessive charges under the garb of different names such as penal charges, penal interests, legal charges, notice charges, levy charges etc. A large number of customer grievances with respect to excessive penal charges and divergent practices have influenced the regulator to think on these lines.  

Read more →

Ushering the new-age TReDS Platform

/0 Comments/in , , , /by

– Anirudh Grover, Executive | finserv@vinodkothari.com

Receivables or debtors though from the face of it is considered as a positive thing for businesses, however when you lift the tag of positivity one can assess the true color of trade receivables. This essentially means that despite it being classified as an asset it may not be helping the business when required. For instance, ABC Ltd has 1 lakh recorded as debtors in its financials however these debtors are of no substantial use unless it is converted into liquid forms of funds. This in essence is the reason why TReDS was introduced, RBI vide Guidelines for the Trade Discounting System (TReDS) opined that the scheme for setting up and operating the institutional mechanism for facilitating the financing of trade receivables of MSMEs from Corporate and other buyers, including Government Departments and Public Sector Undertakings (PSUs), through multiple financiers is known as TReDS.

Read more →

Simplifying the KYC process and business identifier

/0 Comments/in , , /by

Anita Baid, Vice President | finserv@vinodkothari.com

Backdrop

The regulations for conducting customer identification and due diligence by financial sector entities have been laid down by RBI and SEBI, in accordance with the provisions of Prevention of Money Laundering Act and Rules. Under the current regime, the KYC process extends from physical KYC to digital and video-based KYC as well. The physical process of collecting KYC documents and verifying the same involves a lot of paperwork. On the other hand, the Digital KYC Process is a facility that allows lenders to undertake the KYC of custom​​ers via an authenticated application, specifically developed for this purpose, hence making it a paperless process. The Digital KYC process, however, also requires physical interaction. Video-based KYC is both paperless and without any physical intervention.

Read more →

National financial information repository: One more or one for all?

/0 Comments/in , , , , , , /by

– Lovish Jain, Executive | lovish@vinodkothari.com

Some days ago, Mr. Vinod Kothari had commented on a LinkedIn post :

“Do we realise how many places does a lender (NBFC, Bank) register information about a loan? There are 4 credit information companies (such as CIBIL) where the credit data, including performance history, is uploaded. If the exposure is Rs 5 crores or above, in the aggregate over the banking system, information goes on CRILC too.

RBI has recently written to NBFCs reminding them of the obligation to register details with NeSL, an information utility under IBC, irrespective of whether the provisions of Code apply (for example in case of individuals), or whether the lender in question is at all contemplating resorting to IBC as a remedy (for example, consumer loans).

If the loan is a secured loan, the details need to be filed with CERSAI. If the secured loan borrower is a company, details need to be filed with RoC too. If the security interest is on immovable property, one needs to file particulars with land registry. If the security interest is on motor vehicles, the hypothecation is registered with Vahan portal too.

Read more →

Meeting priority sector lending shortfalls: One more option

/0 Comments/in , /by

Aanchal Kaur Nagpal, Manager | finserv@vinodkothari.com

Background

All scheduled commercial banks (including Regional Rural Banks and Small Finance Banks) are required to undertake priority sector lending. RBI mandates PSL to account for at least 40% of a bank’s Adjusted Net Bank Credit (ANBC) or Credit Equivalent of Off‐Balance Sheet Exposure whichever is higher, in accordance with the RBI PSL guidelines[1].

The intent behind prescribing PSL limits for banks is to enable certain sections of the society, though fairly credit-worthy but unable to obtain credit from the formal financial/ banking system, to access adequate credit. These sectors do not seem to be economically lucrative but are indispensable for the overall development and growth of India’s economy.

Read more →