Export Factoring in India
/2 Comments/in Financial Services /by Vinod Kothari Consultants– Paving the way to provide easy finance to exporters
By Simran Jalan (simran@vinodkothari.com)
Introduction
Export factoring bundles together credit protection, export working capital financing, foreign accounts receivables bookkeeping and collection services- all in one product. It is the sale of foreign accounts receivable by a seller (exporter) to a factoring company at a discount, where the financier (factor) assumes the risk of default of the foreign buyer and handles collection on the receivables. The factor will purchase the accounts receivables or invoices, which are raised once the exporter ships the goods to the buyer (importer). Export financing is usually without recourse wherein the financier takes the payment risk of the importer.
Resurrection of masses: Gujarat HC quashes MCA notification on disqualification of directors
/0 Comments/in Companies Act 2013, MCA /by Vinod Kothari ConsultantsBy CS Megha Saraf (megha@vinodkothari.com)
In what might be a major embarrassment to the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (“MCA”), the Gujarat High Court has held that the MCA came up with various notifications in the month of September, 2017, disqualifying 3,09,614[1] directors, was wrong, since it amounted to giving a retrospective effect to the provisions of Section 164 (2) of the Companies Act, 2013 (“Act, 2013”). Notably, in a so-called Operation Clean Money, the MCA struck off some 2,24,733[2] companies, generally branding them as “shell companies”, and simultaneously disqualified their directors, relying on a provision introduced in the Act, 2013 in form of Section 164 (2) which extends to private companies as well.
Accounting for Direct Assignment under Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS)
/1 Comment/in Accounting and Taxation, Financial Services, Indian Accounting Standards (Ind AS), NBFCs, News on Securitization, Securitisation /by Vinod Kothari ConsultantsBy Team IFRS & Valuation Services (ifrs@vinodkothari.com) (finserv@vinodkothari.com)
Introduction
Direct assignment (DA) is a very popular way of achieving liquidity needs of an entity. With the motives of achieving off- balance sheet treatment accompanied by low cost of raising funds, financial sector entities enter into securitisation and direct assignment transactions involving sale of their loan portfolios. DA in the context of Indian securitisation practices involves sale of loan portfolios without the involvement of a special purpose vehicle, unlike securitisation, where setting up of an SPV is an imperative.
The term DA is unique to India, that is, only in Indian context we use the term DA for assignment of loan or lease portfolios to another entity like bank. Whereas, on a global level, a similar arrangements are known by various other names like loan sale, whole-loan sales or loan portfolio sale.
In India, the regulatory framework governing Das and securitisation transactions are laid down by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). The guidelines for governing securitisation structures, often referred to as pass-through certificates route (PTCs) were issued for the first time in 2006, where the focus of the Guidelines was restricted to securitisation transactions only and direct assignments were nowhere in the picture. The RBI Guidelines were revised in 2012 to include provisions relating to direct assignment transactions.
MCA aligns the provisions of Incorporation Rules with Ordinance
/0 Comments/in Amendments to the Companies Act 2013, Companies Act 2013, Corporate Laws, SEBI /by Vinod Kothari ConsultantsDisclosure of promoter group details in shareholding pattern
/0 Comments/in SEBI /by Vinod Kothari ConsultantsFAQs on SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) (Amendment) Regulations, 2018
/0 Comments/in SEBI /by Vinod Kothari ConsultantsSEBI extends disclosure related exemption to eligible NBFCs & HFCs
/0 Comments/in Housing finance, NBFCs /by Vinod Kothari Consultants-Amends Reg. 29 (4) of SAST Regulations, 2011 dealing with disclosures relating to pledge
By Simran Jalan (simran@vinodkothari.com)
SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 2011 (SAST Regulations) provides requirement in relation to manner of acquisition, takeover, disclosure requirements, acquisitions triggering open offer etc. It is a common phenomenon to pledge the shares of a listed entity as a security for availing of loan from Banks, financial institutions.
In line with the approval granted by SEBI in its Board meeting held on December 12, 2018[1] SEBI issued SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) (Third Amendment) Regulations, 2018[2] on December 28, 2018 (‘Amendment Regulations’) exempting certain class of NBFCs and HFCs from the requirement of disclosing acquisition (resulting from encumbrance) and disposal (resulting from release of encumbrance). This article discusses the impact of the said amendment.
The Amendment Regulations are effective from December 31, 2018.
SEBI specifies format for SBO reporting
/0 Comments/in SEBI /by Vinod Kothari ConsultantsBy Nikita Snehil (nikita@vinodkothari.com) (corplaw@vinodkothari.com)
SEBI vide its Circular[1] dated December 7, 2018, has come out with the format for the disclosure of significant beneficial ownership. The said format has been inserted in the format of the shareholding pattern of specified securities, which is submitted by the entities under Regulation 31 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 (‘Listing Regulations’). In this regard, this Article intends to explain the requirement and the details required to be furnished in the revised format of the shareholding pattern especially w.r.t the disclosure of significant beneficial ownership.
Modification in the format of shareholding pattern
The said Circular has modified the format of the shareholding pattern (as per the requirement of Regulation 31 of the Listing Regulations) which was prescribed by SEBI, vide its Circular No. CIR/CFD/CMD/13/2015[2] dated November 30, 2015 (‘Circular 2015’).
The format has been modified by inserting a new table named ‘Table V – Statement showing details of significant beneficial owners’.
Enforcement of the revised format
The Circular shall come into force with effect from the quarter ended March 31, 2019. Therefore, post the quarter, the first reporting has to be done within April 21, 2019 for the last quarter of FY 2018-19.
Meaning of SBO for the purpose of disclosure
The Circular specifies that all the terms specified in this circular shall have the same meaning as specified in the Companies (Significant Beneficial Owners) Rules, 2018[3], which was notified by MCA on June 13, 2018.
Details to be provided in the disclosure
As per SEBI’s format, following details are required to be provided in the statement:
- Name; PAN and Nationality of the significant beneficial owners;
- Name; PAN and Nationality of the registered owners;
- of shares held by beneficial owner;
- Shareholding of the beneficial owner, as a % of total no. of shares (calculated as per SCRR, 1957) as a % of (A+B+C2) [here ‘A’ refers to Promoter and Promoter Group, B refers to Public shareholding and C2 refers to Shares held by Employee Benefit Trust under Securities and Exchange Board of India (Share Based Employee Benefits) Regulations, 2014 as provided in SEBI’s 2015 Circular.
The format seems to be a generalised one, therefore, in cases like, the BO being a foreign investor or where the SBO is the senior managing official of the company, there the companies will have to provide nil or the explanation for not having PAN/ any shareholding respectively.
Also, it is pertinent to note that, the shareholding of the BOs should be considered on diluted basis because the Companies (Significant Beneficial Ownership) Rules, 2018 provides that the instruments in the form of global depository receipts, compulsorily convertible preference shares or compulsorily convertible debentures should be treated as ‘shares’. Therefore, the ownership should be disclosed accordingly.
Conclusion
Considering the various practical implementation issues, MCA has not yet provided the e-form of BEN -1, which is for the disclosure of significant beneficial ownership. Also, the SBO Rules notified by MCA are likely to undergo certain revisions, considering the challenges involved in implementing the SBO Rules without losing the intent of introducing the such requirements. Therefore, SEBI’s step of introducing the format of SBO reporting certainly requires MCA to clarify the ambiguities prevailing in the SBO Rules soonest.
[1] https://www.sebi.gov.in/web/?file=https://www.sebi.gov.in/sebi_data/attachdocs/dec-2018/1544176092665.pdf#page=1&zoom=auto,-61,792
[2] https://www.bseindia.com/downloads/whtsnew/file/Shareholding%20Pattern%20LODR%2030112015.pdf
[3] http://www.mca.gov.in/Ministry/pdf/CompaniesSignificantBeneficial1306_14062018.pdf
