Responsibility by rod: MCA adjudication orders deal punches of penalty for CSR breaches

– Vinod Kothari | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

If the intent of CSR provisions coded in the law was to promote socially responsible conduct on the part of companies, that lesson of responsibility is being taught the very hard, indiscriminately harsh way – by imposing penalties of 2X of the amount involved in CSR breaches, even if the breach was a pure timing mismatch. By now, there are several such adjudication orders – purely as an example, is  where the order clearly notes that there has been no failure on the part of the company to spend the failed amount of Rs 14.50 lacs. The amount was indeed spent, as intended for “ongoing projects”, but there mere segregation of this money into a separate bank account, required to be done within 30 days, was missing. Applying the provisions of sec. 135 (7) which provides for a “penalty of twice the amount” which failed the segregation requirement, though it did not fail the spending requirement.

There are several points that arise here: segregation of the amounts meant to be spent for ongoing projects is merely a ring-fencing requirement, such that companies are aware of the purpose for parking the money, and such money is indeed not commingled with the company’s own funds. If the funds are indeed spent for the purpose for which they are to be segregated, the failure to segregate is, at the most, the failure of the method and not the ultimate result. The failure was transient, and only a timing issue, and not a substantive failure. Therefore, even if punishable, the punishment could not have been the maximum amount provided by the law.

Read more

BRSR Core: SEBI comes up with additional disclosures and assurance on Core matters

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [708.86 KB]

Regulation 30: Disclosure of Regulatory and similar Actions

– Palak Jaiswani | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Apparently with a view to make disclosure more stringent and widen the scope of disclosures, SEBI introduced two new clauses pertaining to regulatory actions, as clause 19 and 20, in Schedule III.A.A, as a part of SEBI (Listing Regulations and Disclosure Requirements) (Second Amendment) Regulations, 2023,  with effect from July 14, 2023.

Newly inserted clauses 19 and 20 in Para A Part A of Schedule III cover the regulatory and similar actions which are required to be disclosed irrespective of the materiality thresholds prescribed.

There is a huge confusion as to what sort of regulatory actions are to be covered in item 19 and 20. Trivial fines and penalties have begun coming up on stock exchange reporting. Hence, it is very important to ascertain the type of regulatory actions that fall within the ambit of either of these two clauses. This article intends to understand the scope and coverage of the aforesaid clauses.

Read more

Online workshop on LODR Reg 30 changes: Clause by clause guide to implementation

On request of several of our participants, we are postponing the workshop to the 28th of July, 2023, Friday, 4pm-7pm.
Register now at : https://forms.gle/emHhuy6rNdhfCtbo7
Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [135.63 KB]

Silence no more golden: New regulatory regime forces top listed companies to respond to rumours

Vinod Kothari and Nitu Poddar (corplaw@vinodkothari.com)

– Updated February 02, 2024

Come June 1, 2024, top 100 listed companies, and thereafter, effective from December 1, 2024 top 250 listed companies, will have to mandatorily respond to market rumours, and cannot keep a policy of maintaining their own silence. What is the intent and scope of this requirement? Does this requirement expect companies to scan through more than 100000 mainstream media publications, and news channels and innumerable investor influencers, keep searching for the written or spoken word about the company, and then keep responding to all the din about the company? Or, the intent is just to ensure that a false market in the company’s securities is not being created or propped up by the company’s silence? And if the company is to respond to rumours, how and where does it respond?

These are some very pertinent questions bothering the larger of the listed entities. We are trying to address some of these questions below.

Read more

Introducing common offer document disclosures for Private Placement and Public Issue

SEBI (Issue and Listing of NCS) (Second Amendment) Regulations, 2023

– Palak Jaiswani | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [122.75 KB]

Carbon credit markets: building the ecosystem for trading in India

– Payal Agarwal, Manager (payal@vinodkothari.com)

The consequences of climate change and the need for a positive climate action need no introduction in the present world. What once remained a matter of concern for the so-called “environmental activists”, gradually traveled their way to the government as countries committed towards achieving “net zero”. Climate action requires involvement of the masses, and therefore, the government is coming up with new regulatory devices towards developing climate action on a large scale.

India is no exception to the same, and following the footsteps of other countries, has proposed to develop a compliance mechanism and domestic market for carbon credits in India. Regulatory inclusion is provided to carbon credits in India by way of an amendment to the Energy Conservation Act, 2001 (“ECA”). Carbon credits are a form of emission trading schemes (ETS), that incentivize the reduction in emissions, against the offsetting of higher emissions by other market participants. A brief comparison of the domestic ETS in other parts of the world, and the existing emissions trading markets in India can be referred to at Emission law amendments: Laying the framework for Carbon trading market in India.

Read more

Identifying Senior Managers: Listing rules may force companies to relook at the tag

Identification as a “senior management person” brings information needs as well as obligations 

– Pammy Jaiswal and Mahak Agarwal

Background

The concept of Senior Management ( herein, ‘SM’, and senior management person or personnel as ‘SMP’ or ‘SMPs’) was not there under the regime of the Companies Act, 1956 and was first introduced under Section 178 of the Companies Act, 2013 (Act, 2013). The law requires the Nomination and Remuneration Committee to get into compensation policies of SMPs.  The definition under the Listing Regulations has, over time, been aligned with that under the Act, 2013. These definitions have been around for almost 10 years now, and therefore, largely seem to have settled.

However, the LODR (2nd Amendment) Regulations[1] have introduced several new information requirements and obligations pertaining to SMPs, which has given rise to the need for relooking at the said position from a fresh perspective.

Read more

Mandatory listing for further bond issues

“Listed once, always go for listing” to apply for new bond issues; optional for existing unlisted issuances

Vinita Nair | Vinod Kothari & Company | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

June 29, 2023 (updated on September 21, 2023)

Background

SEBI approved the proposal for mandatory listing of debentures/ NCDs, in its Board meeting held on June 28, 2023, for all listed entities having outstanding listed NCDs as on December 31, 2023. Effective Jan. 1, 2024, such listed entities will have to now mandatorily list each of its subsequent issuance of NCDs on the stock exchanges.

Aimed at better information flow and liquidity considerations, the move is said to be inspired by data analysis carried out by SEBI, as discussed in its Consultation Paper dated February 09, 2023, basis the information obtained from the depositories. Succinctly, the snapshot of unlisted bond issues by listed companies (it seems that the data of unlisted bond issuances by unlisted companies is not available),  as on January 31, 2023, is as follows:

Figure 1: Snapshot of unlisted bonds issuance by listed entities

This would mean roughly 8% of all bond issuances by listed companies are outstanding, excluding bond issues by completely unlisted entities, which may be insignificant for the purpose of analysis.

Read more

Proposals approved in SEBI Board Meeting held on June 28, 2023: Mandatory Listing of NCDs | Revised sponsor holding in REITs/InvITs and more…

Kaushal Shah, Executive | kaushal@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [164.05 KB]