Finance Companies / Units in International Financial Services Centre (IFSC)

– Anirudh Grover, Executive | finserv@vinodkothari.com

Table of Contents

BackgroundIFSCA Framework for Finance Companies / Units Implications under FEMA
What are Finance Companies and Finance Units?Registration RequirementsAsset Side Transactions
What does a finance company/unit do?Owned Funds requirementCapital and Liabilities Side Transactions
Can they accept deposits?Corporate Governance AspectsDifference between Finance Company / Unit & NBFCs
Liquidity Risk Management (LRM) FrameworkConclusion

Background

International Finance Service Centre (IFSC) is a designated zone physically situated in India but is not considered a part of India. As the name suggests, it is a designated centre set up for the purpose of enabling international financial services, the key word here being international. The purpose is not only to bring global funds into the country but also facilitate such transactions through this zone which otherwise would have been carried out by foreign branches of domestic entities. This purpose is intended to be achieved through establishment of various businesses such as banking units, fund management entities, finance companies etc. We have discussed in depth about the concept of IFSCs along with the applicability of the domestic regulatory framework in our write-up Financial entities in IFSC: A primer.

The objective of this paper is to picture a comprehensive image of all the aspects of finance entities starting from what is meant by finance companies to all the regulatory exposure it has to bear while undertaking any kind of activities.

Read more

Workshop on Insider Trading Framework for Mutual Funds

Click here to register for the workshophttps://forms.gle/hFtagsmfBMpcgkP28
Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [487.81 KB]

Read our article on “Mutual Fund units now under the net of insider trading regulations

Read our FAQs on “Insider Trading Framework for Mutual Funds

Our PIT Resource Centre can be accessed here

FAQs on Insider Trading Framework for Mutual Funds

– Team Corplaw | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [434.10 KB]

Also read our article on “Mutual Fund units now under the net of insider trading regulations

Our PIT Resource Centre can be accessed here

Mutual Fund units now under the net of insider trading regulations

Numerous actionable for Asset Management Companies

– Vinita Nair, Senior Partner | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Background

Investment in MFs are very common these days. As on March 31, 2022 there were about 1120 open ended schemes and 354 close ended schemes[1]. Presently, in terms of Reg. 32 of SEBI (Mutual Funds) Regulations, 1996 every close ended scheme, other than equity linked savings scheme, are required to be listed on stock exchanges. 

Until, the present amendment, SEBI (Prohibition of Insider Trading) Regulations, 2015 (‘PIT Regulations’) were applicable in case of dealing in securities that are listed or proposed to be listed while in possession of Unpublished Price Sensitive Information (‘UPSI’). Units of mutual funds were excluded from the definition of securities under PIT Regulations and therefore, remained outside the purview of the said regulations.

The erstwhile PIT Regulations of 1992 was amended in 2002 to mandate Asset management Companies (AMCs) and Mutual Fund (‘MF’) Trustees to frame internal procedures and conduct for prevention of insider trading, pursuant to which any security which was purchased or sold or was considered for purchase or sale by the organization on behalf of its clients/ schemes of MFs was required to be put on the restricted/ grey list. Thereafter, at the time of finalization of PIT Regulations, the committee led by Mr. N. K. Sodhi felt that there is no longer a special need for a special or separate circular for a specific class of market intermediaries and therefore, the said circulars be withdrawn to ensure consistency. The definition of securities in the proposed draft of PIT Regulations forming part of the said report provided for the meaning assigned to it under the Securities Contract (Regulation) Act, 1956 (‘SCRA’) without any exclusion. It was also explained that an MF set up as a trust, that can issue units of close-ended schemes which are traded in the market would also be a ‘company’ for purposes of the proposed regulations. However, the PIT Regulations as approved by SEBI in its meeting held on November 19, 2014 excluded MF units from the definition of securities. The thought process, as indicated in a news piece, was that even if a person has inside information regarding one company, he cannot possibly take advantage on that information by investing in a scheme, which is a diversified pool of securities of various companies and that there existed strict and transparent norms of NAV (net asset value) calculations and offence of front-running was already covered under SEBI (Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices) Regulations, 2003.

Read more

Draft Master Direction on IT Governance, Risk, Controls and Assurance Practices

An analysis of its impact on NBFCs

– Team Finserv, Vinod Kothari Consultants | finserv@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [432.40 KB]

Our recent write-ups on financial services: https://vinodkothari.com/category/financial-services/

Financial entities in IFSC: A primer

– Parth Ved, Executive | parth@vinodkothari.com

Table of contents

BackgroundApplicability of Domestic Regulatory framework Regulatory framework in IFSC
What is IFSC?Companies Act, 2013IFSCA (Finance Company) Regulations, 2021
Purpose of setting up an IFSC Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999Specific Frameworks for Aircraft Leasing and Ship Leasing
Who regulates IFSC?Income tax act, 1961IFSCA (Fund Management) Regulations, 2022
Is IFSC and GIFT City the same? Goods and Services TaxIFSCA (Banking) Regulations, 2020
Permission for setting up an entity in IFSCStamp dutyClosing remarks
Securities lawRelevant Links
Banking law

Background

Flow of funds, just like a river, not only enriches its destination but also benefits all the stops it passes through. Having a financial hub, a stopover which enables routing billions and billions of global funds on a daily basis can definitely prove resourceful. London, New York, Singapore are some of the globally recognised financial centres, and needless to say these locations are at the forefront of financial development. India too has tried to tap into this with the setting up of GIFT-IFSC in Gujarat, and has tried to position itself as the next big global hub for financial transactions.

Through this write-up, the author tries to explain the concept of International Financial Services Centre and the applicability of domestic regulatory framework on entities set up therein.

Read more

Cryptocurrency – A Cautionary Tale for India

Recent Events in the Crypto-world and a Need for Regulatory Oversight

– Subhojit Shome (subhojit@vinodkothari.com)

Introduction

There are two recent events in the world of crypto that warranted this article – the first one, in order of chronology, fundamentally altered the way that a blockchain (the underlying ledger) for cryptocurrency validates transactions while the second exposed how a cryptocurrency, without underlying value, can be used to window dress a balance sheet and lure in investors.

The second incident, of course, refers to the FTX debacle that has received global media coverage and continues to grab headlines. The first event, Ethereum moving to ‘proof of stake’ consensus mechanism, however, may be a more obscure event to the public eye and likely to have caught the attention of only the hardcore crypto enthusiast, fintech departments of financial institutions and the financial stability divisions of financial market regulators and ministries.

This article, to all intents and purposes, is a ‘cautionary tale’ where we use these two events to explore how cryptocurrency, whether deliberately or inadvertently, may build a house of cards and there is an urgent imperative that regulators look beyond PML/ CFT issues, the ‘usual suspects’ when it comes to crypto, and delve into issues surrounding investor protection and market surveillance.

Read more

IPO draft documents may be kept away from public view until SEBI/stock exchange observations, Issuers may choose an opportune time for public view

– Kaushal Shah, Executive | kaushal@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [236.84 KB]

Read our related resources :

  1. Deferred public disclosure of RHP in IPO/filing of pre DRHP in confidential mode
  2. Monitoring Agency now mandatory in case of Preferential Issue & QIP | ICDR Amendment

Deferred public disclosure of RHP in IPO/filing of pre DRHP in confidential mode

– Anushka Vohra, Manager | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

SEBI vide its notification dated November 21, 2022 has come up with SEBI (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) (Fourth Amendment) Regulations, 2022 (“Amendment”), effective immediately, making changes in the existing SEBI (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2018 (“ICDR”) w.r.t. Initial Public Offer (“IPO”). The Amendment has introduced an alternate method for filing the draft IPO document, known as draft Red Herring Prospectus (DRHP).

Pursuant to this alternate method, the issuer will have the option to keep the information-rich DRHP confidential from the public at large until the issuer is sure to proceed with IPO i.e after receiving observation from SEBI on the draft RHP (“DRHP”) filed. Until such time, the issuer can interact with the QIBs only to gauge the market. Any kind of marketing of IPO apart from interacting with the QIBs is prohibited during this period.

Read more

The basics of digital gold

Timothy Lopes | Manager

finserv@vinodkothari.com

Vinod Kothari Consultants Pvt. Ltd.

The precious metal, gold, has for the longest time been seen as a form of investment that provides adequate returns, diversification and also possess hedging properties. Especially in a country like India, which is one of the largest markets for gold according to the World Gold Council[1], the yellow metal plays an important role. A report by ICRA forecasts that gold jewellery demand would grow by 11% YoY in FY 2023[2].

In the era of digitisation, nearly every form of investment, traditional or otherwise, is available at our fingertips. Electronic media has brought with it ease of access, speed, convenience, as well as, new avenues for innovation.

Out of the digitisation era, the concept of digital gold has emerged as an avenue for investors and consumers alike to purchase gold through digital means. Although an innovative concept, there seems to be a gap in the regulatory framework surrounding digital gold, which is still evolving.

This article aims to highlight the concept of digital gold and the regulatory regime (or lack thereof) surrounding it.

Read more