Posts

Workshop on SEBI LODR 2nd Amendment Regulations, 2023

In view of the overwhelming response received for our workshop held yesterday, we are announcing a repeat workshop on 30th June, 2023. You may register your interest here – https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSff223EAvPfU3roZogwubvO0cQ1S1Dx8R9Kopv8XH-ff0nX_g/viewform
Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [128.80 KB]

Getting material on “material” events and information:

SEBI notifies amendments to Listing Regulations

-Payal Agarwal, Manager  (payal@vinodkothari.com

Keeping in view of the significance of the amendments, we are conducting a workshop on the same. Details can be accessed here – https://vinodkothari.com/2023/06/workshop-on-sebi-lodr-2nd-amendment-regulations-2023/

The importance of transparency and timely dissemination of material information for a listed entity needs no emphasis, since most of these events and information may have a direct bearing on the price discovery of the securities of the listed entities and the investors’ decisions. The intent of Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 (“Listing Regulations”) is to ensure a seamless flow of information; the Regulation is complemented by Schedule III thereto, which provides an indicative list of the events or information in a listed entity that may be considered “material” and thereby, requires prompt disclosure by way of intimations to the stock exchange(s) in which the entity is listed.

While Para A of Part A of Schedule III specifies the list of information/ events which are “deemed” material, Para B specifies a list of information/ events which are to be tested based on the application of guidelines of materiality. Further, Para C requires intimation of any major development that is likely to affect the business and Regulation 30 also provides a residuary provision of intimation of any other information or event that does not fall either under Para A or Part B of Part A of the Listing Regulations, however, is material.  The guidelines of materiality for the purpose of testing the events/ information under Para B of Part A of Schedule III are provided in sub-regulation (4) of Reg 30 and are supposed to be documented in the policy for determination of materiality (“Materiality Policy”) of the listed entity. The Materiality Policy of a listed entity plays a prominent role in determining the disclosure practices of a listed entity.

SEBI vide an amendment notification dated 14th June 2023 has notified (“Amendment Regulations”) several changes to the Listing Regulations which were earlier proposed in a Consultation Paper with respect to the disclosure of material events. The same has now been incorporated under the Listing Regulations itself. A few of these include :

  1. Quantifying the meaning of “material”, thereby limiting discretion with the listed entities,
  2. Requiring amendments in Materiality Policy;
  3. Reducing timelines for disclosures;  
  4. Mandatory verification of market rumours by top 100 (250 from FY 24-25) listed entities;
  5. Broadening and shuffling of the events/ information listed under Schedule III etc.

The Amendment Regulations are applicable from the 30th day of the  publication of the notification, i.e., on and from 14th July, 2023. Further, the amendments are applicable only to the equity-listed entities, since debt-listed entities including High-value Debt Listed Entities are outside the scope of Regulation 30. We have listed some of the major amendments in this write-up.

Read more

Legal Entity Identifier Code now mandatory for bond issuers

Ajay Ramanathan, Executive | ajay@vinodkothari.com

Background

Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) Code is a unique 20-digit code used to identify legal entities that engage in financial transactions worldwide in order to improve the quality and accuracy of financial data systems for better risk management post the global financial crisis by establishing a global reference system.

Prior to the present SEBI Circular, all non-individual borrowers availing an aggregate exposure[1] of Rs. 5 crore and above from banks and financial institutions were mandated to obtain LEI Code over the prescribed timeline.

Read more

Continuing Disclosures by listed entities: Regulation 30 of SEBI LODR

– Vinod Kothari | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [911.96 KB]

Our article on Reg 30 of LODR Regulations can be viewed here

Presentation on Annual Secretarial Compliance report

– Vinita Nair, Senior Partner | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [602.72 KB]

Regulating ESG Rating Providers in India

– SEBI approves regulations for ERPs through amendments to CRA Regulations

– Payal Agarwal, Deputy Manager (payal@vinodkothari.com)

As ESG and climate change concerns assume global priority, there is a growing interest among businesses to claim their offerings, products or structures to be green.  This  growing interest of a variety of stakeholders has led to the emergence of ESG Rating Providers (“ERPs”) for ranking an entity’s ESG profile, providing “green” or other coloured labels, or giving other affirmations as sustainability or sustainable-linkage. Unlike credit ratings, ESG ratings are currently not within the direct domain of securities regulators; however, to the extent ESG ratings relate to securities offerings or financial products, the securities regulators claim to have jurisdiction., he International Organization of Securities Commissions (“IOSCO”) has been working towards evolving recommendatory standards. IOSCO published its final report on Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Ratings and Data Products Providers (“IOSCO Consultation Report”) in November, 2021.

Following the same, SEBI released a consultation paper on Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Rating Providers for Securities Markets (“ERPs Consultation Paper”) on 24th January, 2022, and on the basis of the public consultation as well as global regulatory developments, had proposed a draft regulatory framework for ERPs (“Draft ERP Framework”) on 22nd February, 2023. Recently, on 29th March, 2023, SEBI has approved to bring a regulatory framework for ERPs in India, by inserting a new chapter to the existing SEBI (Credit Rating Agencies) Regulations, 1999 (“CRA Regulations”).

Read more

SEBI amends its comprehensive PIT FAQs: Explains contra trade restrictions

Aisha Begum Ansari & Sanya Agarwal | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [204.67 KB]

SEBI approves a basket of amendments – BM dated 29th March, 2023

ESG BRSR core, Quantitative thresholds for material events, Dematerialisation of Bonus shares, Backstop fund for mutual funds, Valuation rules for AIFs

– Mahak Agarwal, Sanya Agrawal & Vanshika Khandelwal | corplaw@vinodkotahri.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [179.71 KB]

The triumphs and tribulations of being a promoter in listed entities

– Team Corplaw | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Introduction

The classic rule of Solomon, that the shareholders are different and the company that they promote is different, and that the liabilities of the company cannot be passed over to the shareholders, seems to be getting constantly indented, particularly as courts and regulators realize that companies are inanimate; it is the controlling heads who actually run companies. Therefore, if there is a vice in the schematics of a company, it must rope in the promoters too. Securities regulator, and our own SEBI too, has been fastening several obligations of listed entities on the promoters, including the recent ‘Consultation paper on strengthening corporate governance at listed entities by empowering shareholders’ proposal to block the personal shareholdings of the promoters for continued lapses by the listed entity.

There are several other implications of being a promoter or promoter group entity, transactions by such entities with the listed entity are mandatorily treated as related party transactions, public disclosures on sale of shares. There are several sections of the Companies Act, 2013 (“Act”) as well, which impose liabilities, including criminal liabilities, on promoters. Some of these provisions are section 7 (imposing criminal liability for incorporation related offenses), of the Act, if it is found that the company has been incorporated by furnishing any false information or representation or by suppression of any material information, the promoters would be held liable for action under section 447. Further, section 34 elaborates that if any statement in the prospectus is untrue or misleading, the promoter will be held criminally liable under Section 447. On the same lines, section 35 (imposing civil liability for public issue related mis-statements), section 42 (imposing penalty for contravening the provisions w.r.t private placement including default in filing of return of allotment), section 102 (imposing penalty for non-disclosure / wrongful disclosure in the explanatory statement), 284 (liability with respect to non-cooperation with liquidator) to list a few.

This article focuses on who is a promoter/promoter group entity (PGE), what are the implications of being either, how does one get out of the classification, having been into either, both in case of listed and unlisted companies.

Read more

Crowdfunding platforms – risks and concerns in the Indian context

Timothy Lopes, Manager

finserv@vinodkothari.com

Introduction

Crowdfunding as a concept has been in the limelight for quite some time now. Globally there are several crowdfunding platforms that exist. These crowdfunding platforms essentially allow almost anybody to raise funds for any cause, ideas or business ventures. Interestingly, the first online crowdfunding platform was launched back in 2001[1].

However, with the advent of online crowdfunding platforms also comes the inherent risks associated with it. Through this article, the author aims to highlight the inherent risks associated with crowdfunding along with the legal permissibility and restraints in India.

Read more