Contents of Resolution Plan redrawn, duties of RP redefined
/0 Comments/in Insolvency and Bankruptcy /by Vinod Kothari ConsultantsIBBI notifies 3rd amendment to CIRP and Fast Track Regulations
08.11.2017
Vallari Dubey
Introduction
Resolution plans pursuant to Section 30 and Section 31 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“the Code”) will hereon be required to contain details of the Resolution Applicant along with the Connected Persons.
A time bound corporate insolvency resolution process is linked with good resolution plans that can feasibly protect the Corporate Debtor from the curse of liquidation. With this ideology, IBBI has brought third set of amendments to the CIRP Regulations and Fast Track Regulation of the Code. Read more →
IMPLEMENTATION OF IFRS-16 IN VARIOUS COUNTRIES
/0 Comments/in Accounting and Taxation /by Vinod Kothari ConsultantsBy Aakanksha Banthia, (finserv@vinodkothari.com)
Introduction
While IASB has proposed to implement IFRS 16 with effect from 1st January, 2019, several countries which uses IFRS as a benchmark for preparing standards of accounting have not yet converged the existing leasing standards with IFRS 16. In this article we intend to capture the extent of implementation of IFRS 16 in various jurisdictions.
1. New Zealand
New Zealand Equivalent to International Financial Reporting Standard 16 Leases (NZ IFRS 16) was issued on 11 February 2016 by the New Zealand Accounting Standards Board of the External Reporting Board. The standard becomes effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1st January, 2019 with early adoption possibility. These are applicable in ‘For Profit Entities’ which includes both Public Entities and SME’s[1].
2. South Africa
In South Africa IFRS-16 is being adopted and the same will become effective from 1st January, 2019. Here, IFRS-16 becomes applicable to both domestic public companies as well as SME’s[2].
3. Singapore
The Accounting Standards Council (ASC) issued FRS 116 Leases as the Singapore equivalent of IFRS 16. The new Singapore leases standard will be effective from 1st January 2019 and all companies are required to get ready for the adoption and implementation of FRS 116[3] .
4. Australia
Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB) issued AASB 16 in February, 2016 which is equivalent to IFRS 16 with extra paragraphs on Leasing Treatment for Non Profit Entities. This Standard is applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2019[4].
5. Indonesia
The Financial Accounting Standards Board of the Indonesian Institute of Accountants (DSAK IAI) has approved the Exposure Draft (DE) PSAK 73: Leases which are the result of the adoption of IFRS 16 Leases effective as of January 1, 2019. ‘DE PSAK 73: The lease’ is proposed to become effective from January 1, 2020 with an early adoption option permitted for the entity which has also applied ‘DE PSAK 72: Revenue from Contract to Customer’[5].
6. United Kingdom
The Financial Reporting Council (FRC) of United Kingdom published a feedback statement summarising respondents’ comments to its Consultation Document on updating FRS 102 for changes in IFRS. The statement also sets out the FRC’s revised approach. The FRC agrees that further evidence-gathering and analysis needs to be undertaken before any proposals to reflect the principles of IFRS 16 in FRS 102 could be made. Therefore, the FRC will not be issuing a triennial review phase 2 exposure draft later this year. Thus, IFRS 16 is not being implemented in UK from the effective date stated by IASB.[6]
7. Japan
The Accounting Standards Board of Japan (ASBJ) undertakes the endorsement process on the Standards and Interpretations (collectively referred to as ‘Standards’) issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and issues Japan’s Modified International Standards (JMIS). ASBJ undertakes to endorse amendments in IFRS in JMIS Exposure Drafts. According to Exposure Draft 5, ASBJ wants to endorse the amendments in IFRS 16 individually. However, no other Exposure Draft has been drawn to take in effect the changes implemented in IFRS-16 and no timeline has been stated as to when they will they make IFRS 16 effective.[7]
8. Canada
The Accounting Standards Board’s (AcSB) due process includes ensuring that Canadian entities’ financial reporting needs are considered by the IASB and issuing the AcSB’s own exposure draft on IFRS 16, subject to the responses to the AcSB’s exposure draft on whether the IASB’s proposals are appropriate for application in Canada, the AcSB expects that the amendments will be incorporated into Canadian GAAP in accordance with the AcSB’s strategy of adopting IFRSs for publicly accountable enterprises. Draft Exposure states the effective period of implementation will be for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2019. However, it is still in exposure draft and final standard has not been made effective[8].
9. United States
Financial Accounting Standard Boards (FASB) which issues US GAAP is not convergent with IFRS 16. USA equivalent Standard to IFRS 16 is Topic 842, which though amended in February 2016, does not incorporate the major changes which IFRS 16 has got in the books of the lessee. Thus, FASB is not complying with IFRS.[9]
10. India
Accounting Standard Board ICAI has issued IND AS which substantially converges with IFRS. IFRS 16 has been adopted in exposure draft of IND AS 116 Leases which has not been implemented till now. Ind AS 116 is proposed to be effective from annual periods beginning on or after 1st April, 2019[10].
Conclusion
IFRS 16 is being implemented by some developed countries, but major countries like USA is not converging with IFRS 16 and UK is also not implementing the standard on the effective date of 1st January, 2019 and it is in draft format for most of the countries mentioned above and implementation on the effective date seems difficult. Below is a table showing the effective dates of implementation of IFRS 16 for the above mentioned Jurisdictions.
| Country | Effective Date of Implementation of IFRS 16 | Comments |
| New Zealand | Ist January, 2019 | |
| South Africa | Ist January, 2019 | |
| Singapore | Ist January, 2019 | |
| Australia | Ist January, 2019 | AASB 16 includes paragraph on treatment for Non Profit Entities which is not mentioned in IFRS 16 |
| Indonesia | Ist January, 2020 | Standard is still in exposure draft form |
| United Kingdom | — | No exposure draft has been prepared by FRC |
| Japan | — | No exposure draft has been prepared by ASBJ |
| Canada | Ist January, 2019 | Standard is still in exposure draft form |
| United States | — | FASB is not implementing IFRS 16 |
| India | Ist January, 2019 | Standard is still in exposure draft form |
[1]https://www.xrb.govt.nz/accounting-standards/for-profit-entities/nz-ifrs-16/
[2]https://www.saica.co.za/Technical/FinancialReporting/TheNewLeasesStandard/tabid/3893/language/en-ZA/Default.aspx
http://www.ifrs.org/use-around-the-world/use-of-ifrs-standards-by-jurisdiction/south-africa/
[3] https://isca.org.sg/media/779571/isca_lease-accounting-report.pdf
[4] http://www.aasb.gov.au/admin/file/content105/c9/AASB16_02-16.pdf
[5]https://translate.google.co.in/translate?hl=en&sl=id&u=http://www.iaiglobal.or.id/v03/berita-kegiatan/detailberita-990%3Dpengesahan-draf-eksposur-de-psak-73-sewa&prev=search
https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/id/pdf/2017/05/id-anf-may17-ed-psak73-lease.pdf
[6]https://www.frc.org.uk/getattachment/3dc51dc2-56db-4dfc-8f8c-28396ee95b8d/Feedback-consultation-triennial-review-June-2017.pdf
[7]https://www.asb.or.jp/en/ifrs/exposure_drafts/2017-1031.html
https://www.asb.or.jp/en/wp-content/uploads/exposure_20171031_01_e.pdf
[8]http://www.frascanada.ca/international-financial-reporting-standards/projects/completed/item55632.aspx
[9]http://www.fasb.org/jsp/FASB/Document_C/DocumentPage?cid=1176167901010&acceptedDisclaimer=true
http://www.fasb.org/jsp/FASB/Page/SectionPage&cid=1218220137102
LEI becomes mandatory for Large Corporate Borrowers
/0 Comments/in Financial Services /by Vinod Kothari ConsultantsBy Mayank Agarwal (finserv@vinodkothari.com)
Overview
The global financial crisis of 2007-08 underlined the importance of maintaining a common global database that facilitates identification of parties to a financial transaction. Ambiguity of the dealing parties and a shortage of information led to a breakdown in the financial ecospace, contributing to the downfall of established stalwarts such as Lehmann brothers as well. In light of such crisis, establishing a universal identity of all entites engaged in a financial transaction was seen as imperative. This led to the establishment of Global Legal Entity Identifier Foundation (GLEIF) in the year 2014, the Central Operating Unit for registration for a Legal Entity Identifier. Read more →
Restoring Process for Appointing Directors on Vacant Board
/0 Comments/in Companies Act 2013, Corporate Laws /by Vinod Kothari ConsultantsRegistered Valuers under Companies Act, 2013
/0 Comments/in Companies Act 2013, Corporate Laws /by Vinod Kothari ConsultantsMandatory linking of Aadhaar and PAN under PMLA
/0 Comments/in Financial Services, NBFCs /by Vinod Kothari ConsultantsBy Anita Baid, (finserv@vinodkothari.com)
PML Second Amendment Rules
The Ministry of Finance on 1st June, 2017 vide notification No. G.S.R. 538(E) issued the [1]Prevention of Money-Laundering (Maintenance of Records) Second Amendment Rules, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “Second Amendment Rules”) mandating all account holders of the reporting entities i.e., banks and financial institutions to link Aadhaar number issued by the Unique Identification Authority of India and Permanent Account Number (PAN) or Form No. 60 as defined in Income-tax Rules, 1962. The timelines for the same were as below- Read more →
Section 14 (1) v. Section 60(2) of the Code: Creditors cannot take action against personal guarantors while on-going CIRP of a Corporate Debtor
/0 Comments/in Insolvency and Bankruptcy /by Vinod Kothari ConsultantsBy Shreya Routh & Vallari Dubey, (resolution@vinodkothari.com)
Brief facts of the case
Petitioners had filed a writ petition with the Allahabad High Court, challenging the order[1] passed by the Debt Recovery Tribunal (“DRT”). Petitioners are the guarantors of M/s LML Limited, Kanpur (hereinafter referred as the “Company”). The State Bank of India filed an application before the Debt Recovery Tribunal, Allahabad against the Company as the principal borrower and Sanjeev Shriya and others (hereinafter referred to as the “Petitioners”) as the guarantors. On 6.7.2017 DRT heard both the parties and passed the impugned order, staying the proceeding against the Company on the basis of the order passed by NCLT Allahabad dated 30.05.2017 imposing Moratorium on legal proceedings under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Subsequent to this, Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process began for the corporate debtor being the Company. As far as the resolution process for the personal guarantors was concerned, the interpretation of Section 60 of the Code provided for admitting such application to NCLT. However, since such provisions are not yet notified, being an individual, initiation of insolvency proceedings were placed before DRT. Read more →
Regulations on Prepaid Payment Instruments -Comparing the Master Circular and Master Directions
/0 Comments/in Banking Regulations, Financial Services, Fintechs and Payment and Settlement Systems, Payment and Settlement Systems /by Vinod Kothari ConsultantsBy Anita Baid, (finserv@vinodkothari.com)
With an enlarged view of the Government to make India go cashless and straddle towards the concept of digitalisation, many companies, specifically NBFCs are seeking approval from the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) to set up business in Prepaid Payment Instruments (PPI). Before getting into the present regulatory framework of such PPIs, one needs to understand the concept of such instruments. PPIs are a form of digital electronic instruments. PPI issuers open an account for its account holders known as PPI holders and with the help of such account, withdrawal/ deposit is made for some pre-ascertained payments or receipt. A certain amount is deposited into such PPI Account from the holder’s Bank A/c and using the balance deposited in the PPI Account, payments are made and/or even cash is received. The introduction of such mechanism enables a person to go cashless. Such PPI instruments can be of three types: Read more →
