Need for strategic vision in CSR spending by companies

– Pammy Jaiswal, Partner | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

The article was also published in the CRA E-Bulletin and can be viewed here

Background

While the sense of ‘Corporate Social Responsibility’ (‘CSR’) might have been the result of the statute, first on a “comply or explain” basis, and later, as a mandate, it is heartening to note that companies are now not looking at CSR as a mere compulsion, but are seeing this as an instrument for social bridge-building. As is well known, the provisions were introduced, arguably as a unique case globally, in 2014 under the Companies Act, 2013 (‘Act’). From that year till FY 2021-2022, companies have spent approximately INR 1,39,202 crores[1] on CSR activities. In fact, it is pleasantly surprising to note that companies have been targeting to spend their minimum obligations; the gap between the prescribed spending and the actual spending has consistently been narrowing as can be seen from the graph given below.  With the introduction of the Companies Corporate Social Responsibility Policy (Amendment) Rules, 2021[2], read with the changes under section 135 of the Act pursuant to the Companies (Amendment) Act, 2019[3], an element of penalty for not doing the needful has been added, at the same time permitting companies to overspend their obligation and claim a set off within the next 3 years, there are several companies which are spending more than their targets.

   Data Source: India CSR Outlook Reports

Having said that, it will be important to discuss whether spending itself will help attain the motive for which the CSR framework was introduced? CSR is a part of a larger business responsibility and sustainability.  If companies confine their CSR ideologies to simply adding up to a requirement of spending amount, will the society get back what it ought to be getting back form a responsible business?  Should companies look at CSR beyond mere spending, and construct a CSR vision based on the negative footprints created by their activities, if any, or otherwise, create social impact relevant to their businesses?

Read more

Financing transition from “brown” to “green”

SEBI prescribes additional requirements for transition bonds

– Mahak Agarwal, Executive | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Need for transition finance

As climate change and its impacts continue to remain one of the major concerns of any economy, transition finance is a step towards effectively transforming carbon emissions and combating climate change.

‘Transition Bonds’, as the word speaks for itself, are debt instruments that facilitate transition of a carbon-intensive business into decarbonizing business and eventually achieving the Net Zero emissions targets.

While it is true that change is the only constant, it cannot be denied that the same can often be challenging. Similar is the case with enterprises looking to metamorphosize their activities into a sustainable form. A huge amount of finance is required for carbon-intensive sectors to decarbonize and it is here that transition bonds find their application.

Read more

Amendments to KYC Directions including non- face-to-face KYC

Anita Baid in conversation with Vinod Kothari

Evince your interest here – https://forms.gle/JLaVk6n1mBHdsw4h9

Live on YouTube – https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCgzB-ZviIMcuA_1uv6jATbg/videos

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [745.13 KB]

Practicing professionals as reporting entities under PMLA

Ministry of Finance notification notifies certain client transactions by CA, CS and CMAs for money laundering law

– Team Finserv | finserv@vinodkothari.com

Brief Background

The Ministry of Finance vide notification dated May 03, 2023 (‘Notification’) has widened the ambit of the term “Reporting Entity” as defined in Section 2(1)(wa), read with sec. 2 (1)(sa) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (‘PMLA’). The Notification, which has already created a lot of flutter, seems to bring practising corporate professionals (CAs, CSs, CMAs), if the said corporate professionals are carrying certain “financial transactions” on behalf of their clients.

At its first reading, one may either take a very aggressive view, to regard all practising corporate  professionals as being “reporting entities”. However, a finer reading suggests that only such professionals, who are carrying specified financial transactions on behalf of their clients, are covered as reporting entities. We discuss this below.

Our YouTube video on the topic discussing the changes brought in by the said notification and its implications is available here – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hWdeFfVcnQM
Read more

Legal Entity Identifier Code now mandatory for bond issuers

Ajay Ramanathan, Executive | ajay@vinodkothari.com

Background

Legal Entity Identifier (LEI) Code is a unique 20-digit code used to identify legal entities that engage in financial transactions worldwide in order to improve the quality and accuracy of financial data systems for better risk management post the global financial crisis by establishing a global reference system.

Prior to the present SEBI Circular, all non-individual borrowers availing an aggregate exposure[1] of Rs. 5 crore and above from banks and financial institutions were mandated to obtain LEI Code over the prescribed timeline.

Read more

Security Interest: Meaning, forms, registration, enforcement, and effects of non-registration

-Team Vinod Kothari and Company | resolution@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [901.29 KB]

Evolution of concept of related parties and related party transactions

-Team Vinod Kothari and Company | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [888.42 KB]

Our Resource Centre on Related Party Transactions can be viewed here

Continuing Disclosures by listed entities: Regulation 30 of SEBI LODR

– Vinod Kothari | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [911.96 KB]

Our article on Reg 30 of LODR Regulations can be viewed here

Amended KYC norms: A move towards faceless KYC

RBI amends KYC norms to permit faceless KYC; beneficial owner of 10% or more to be subjected to KYC

– Anita Baid, Vice President | anita@vinodkothari.com

Recognising the increasing trend towards faceless lending, and the use of technology for customer due diligence, the RBI has made much-needed changes in the KYC process, permitting lenders to avoid any of physical interface with borrowers and rely on documents stored in Digilocker or other e-documents. Amendments, immediately effective, were made to the Master Direction – Know Your Customer (KYC) Direction, 2016 vide a notification dated April 28, 2023.

Watch our YouTube video on the topic here – https://www.youtube.com/live/Ewi4FW8G0xk?feature=share

The amendments in the KYC Directions are applicable to every entity regulated by the RBI, including but not limited to banks, cooperative banks, payment system providers, AIFIs  as well as NBFCs intend to achieve the following:

Read more