Workshop on SEBI LODR 2nd Amendment Regulations, 2023

In view of the overwhelming response received for our workshop held yesterday, we are announcing a repeat workshop on 30th June, 2023. You may register your interest here – https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSff223EAvPfU3roZogwubvO0cQ1S1Dx8R9Kopv8XH-ff0nX_g/viewform
Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [128.80 KB]

Getting material on “material” events and information:

SEBI notifies amendments to Listing Regulations

-Payal Agarwal, Manager  (payal@vinodkothari.com

Keeping in view of the significance of the amendments, we are conducting a workshop on the same. Details can be accessed here – https://vinodkothari.com/2023/06/workshop-on-sebi-lodr-2nd-amendment-regulations-2023/

The importance of transparency and timely dissemination of material information for a listed entity needs no emphasis, since most of these events and information may have a direct bearing on the price discovery of the securities of the listed entities and the investors’ decisions. The intent of Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 (“Listing Regulations”) is to ensure a seamless flow of information; the Regulation is complemented by Schedule III thereto, which provides an indicative list of the events or information in a listed entity that may be considered “material” and thereby, requires prompt disclosure by way of intimations to the stock exchange(s) in which the entity is listed.

While Para A of Part A of Schedule III specifies the list of information/ events which are “deemed” material, Para B specifies a list of information/ events which are to be tested based on the application of guidelines of materiality. Further, Para C requires intimation of any major development that is likely to affect the business and Regulation 30 also provides a residuary provision of intimation of any other information or event that does not fall either under Para A or Part B of Part A of the Listing Regulations, however, is material.  The guidelines of materiality for the purpose of testing the events/ information under Para B of Part A of Schedule III are provided in sub-regulation (4) of Reg 30 and are supposed to be documented in the policy for determination of materiality (“Materiality Policy”) of the listed entity. The Materiality Policy of a listed entity plays a prominent role in determining the disclosure practices of a listed entity.

SEBI vide an amendment notification dated 14th June 2023 has notified (“Amendment Regulations”) several changes to the Listing Regulations which were earlier proposed in a Consultation Paper with respect to the disclosure of material events. The same has now been incorporated under the Listing Regulations itself. A few of these include :

  1. Quantifying the meaning of “material”, thereby limiting discretion with the listed entities,
  2. Requiring amendments in Materiality Policy;
  3. Reducing timelines for disclosures;  
  4. Mandatory verification of market rumours by top 100 (250 from FY 24-25) listed entities;
  5. Broadening and shuffling of the events/ information listed under Schedule III etc.

The Amendment Regulations are applicable from the 30th day of the  publication of the notification, i.e., on and from 14th July, 2023. Further, the amendments are applicable only to the equity-listed entities, since debt-listed entities including High-value Debt Listed Entities are outside the scope of Regulation 30. We have listed some of the major amendments in this write-up.

Read more

Evolution of concept of related parties and related party transactions

-Team Vinod Kothari and Company | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [888.42 KB]

Our Resource Centre on Related Party Transactions can be viewed here

Continuing Disclosures by listed entities: Regulation 30 of SEBI LODR

– Vinod Kothari | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [911.96 KB]

Our article on Reg 30 of LODR Regulations can be viewed here

Presentation on Annual Secretarial Compliance report

– Vinita Nair, Senior Partner | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [602.72 KB]

A sigh of relief for the HVDLEs, not shy from compliance

Extension of “comply or explain” period in respect of corporate governance norms

Nitu Poddar | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

SEBI in its board meeting dated March 29, 2023 decided to extend the timeline for “comply or explain” period for the High Value Debt Listed Entity (HVDLE) for compliance of corporate governance norms (i.e. regulation 16 to 27 of LODR Regulations) till March 31, 2024. A HVDLE is a company having listed debt and an outstanding value of such listed debt of Rupees 500 crore and above. It is to be noted that the HVDLEs were given a timeline of two financial years[1] (FY 21-22 and 22-23) to comply with the corporate governance norms or explain the reason for non-compliance in the quarterly corporate governance report to be filed with the stock exchange(s). Given this extension of mandatory compliance of the said norms – can the HVDLEs just sit back and relax till March 31, 2024? No, they will still have to endeavor to comply. Any short compliance requires reporting to the exchanges on a quarterly basis.

Read more

Entering in FY 23-24: Regulatory review of corporate law developments

– Payal Agarwal, Deputy Manager (payal@vinodkothari.com)

As the new financial year 23-24 commences, we look back at where we stand at the end of FY 22-23, in terms of the regulatory developments. While there has been no substantial traffic in terms of regulatory developments to the Companies Act, the migration of various forms in MCA’s V3 portal proved to be (and still continues to be so in some cases) a turmoil, with a standstill in the fundraising process, and other practical difficulties, even resulting in levy of additional fines. 

There has been significant traction on the part of SEBI too. While Structured Digital Database (SDD) remained the buzzword for the listed entities with the stock exchanges requiring them to submit quarterly compliance certificates, the stress for proper controls on insider trading remained the focal point. Having stiffed the nerves of the Compliance Officers in the listed entities through the quarterly compliance certificates, the same has been finally absorbed in the annual secretarial compliance reports under the Listing Regulations.

Read more

SEBI approves a basket of amendments – BM dated 29th March, 2023

ESG BRSR core, Quantitative thresholds for material events, Dematerialisation of Bonus shares, Backstop fund for mutual funds, Valuation rules for AIFs

– Mahak Agarwal, Sanya Agrawal & Vanshika Khandelwal | corplaw@vinodkotahri.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [179.71 KB]

The triumphs and tribulations of being a promoter in listed entities

– Team Corplaw | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Introduction

The classic rule of Solomon, that the shareholders are different and the company that they promote is different, and that the liabilities of the company cannot be passed over to the shareholders, seems to be getting constantly indented, particularly as courts and regulators realize that companies are inanimate; it is the controlling heads who actually run companies. Therefore, if there is a vice in the schematics of a company, it must rope in the promoters too. Securities regulator, and our own SEBI too, has been fastening several obligations of listed entities on the promoters, including the recent ‘Consultation paper on strengthening corporate governance at listed entities by empowering shareholders’ proposal to block the personal shareholdings of the promoters for continued lapses by the listed entity.

There are several other implications of being a promoter or promoter group entity, transactions by such entities with the listed entity are mandatorily treated as related party transactions, public disclosures on sale of shares. There are several sections of the Companies Act, 2013 (“Act”) as well, which impose liabilities, including criminal liabilities, on promoters. Some of these provisions are section 7 (imposing criminal liability for incorporation related offenses), of the Act, if it is found that the company has been incorporated by furnishing any false information or representation or by suppression of any material information, the promoters would be held liable for action under section 447. Further, section 34 elaborates that if any statement in the prospectus is untrue or misleading, the promoter will be held criminally liable under Section 447. On the same lines, section 35 (imposing civil liability for public issue related mis-statements), section 42 (imposing penalty for contravening the provisions w.r.t private placement including default in filing of return of allotment), section 102 (imposing penalty for non-disclosure / wrongful disclosure in the explanatory statement), 284 (liability with respect to non-cooperation with liquidator) to list a few.

This article focuses on who is a promoter/promoter group entity (PGE), what are the implications of being either, how does one get out of the classification, having been into either, both in case of listed and unlisted companies.

Read more

FAQs on Purpose and Effect test for RPTs

-Team Vinod Kothari and Company | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [316.51 KB]

For further reading on the topic –