Cross-Breeding of Entities: NCLT upholds the view!

Pammy Jaiswal

Partner, Vinod Kothari and Company

[corplaw@vinodkothari.com]

Background

Even though each time when law is amended, the stakeholders do expect the change will be a gap filing exercise or a step towards making it more liberal or strict, as the case may be. However, sometimes such amendment comes with a lacuna. Earlier under the Companies Act, 1956 (‘Act, 1956’), sections 391 – 394 dealt with the provisions of compromises, arrangements, amalgamation and reconstruction. The said provisions were re-casted under the Companies Act, 2013 (‘Act, 2013’) under sections 230 – 234. The said provision under the Act, 2013 suffers from a significant gap.

This write-up is an attempt to foreclose the lacuna under the new provision under law and how the quasi-judicial body has correctly interpreted the said gap in law. Read more

LIBERAL INTERPRETATION OF SECTION 8 AND 9(3)(C) OF THE IBC BY THE APEX COURT

By Vishal Hablani (resolution@vinodkothari.com) Read more

NO EMBARGO ON PROCEEDINGS IN FAVOUR OF CORPORATE DEBTOR U/S 14(1) OF THE CODE

-By Sikha Bansal & Vishal Hablani (resolution@vinodkothari.com) Read more

APPLICATION UNDER SARFAESI- A Liberal Approach by the Supreme Court

By Richa Saraf, (legal@vinodkothari.com) Read more

DECIPHERING “DISPUTE” IN INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE

By Richa Saraf, (legal@vinodkothari.com)

-Mobilox Innovations Pvt. Ltd. v. Kirusa Software Pvt. Ltd.[1]

Read more

CONSTITUTIONAL VALIDITY OF INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE

By Richa Saraf, (legal@vinodkothari.com) Read more