The triumphs and tribulations of being a promoter in listed entities

– Team Corplaw | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Introduction

The classic rule of Solomon, that the shareholders are different and the company that they promote is different, and that the liabilities of the company cannot be passed over to the shareholders, seems to be getting constantly indented, particularly as courts and regulators realize that companies are inanimate; it is the controlling heads who actually run companies. Therefore, if there is a vice in the schematics of a company, it must rope in the promoters too. Securities regulator, and our own SEBI too, has been fastening several obligations of listed entities on the promoters, including the recent ‘Consultation paper on strengthening corporate governance at listed entities by empowering shareholders’ proposal to block the personal shareholdings of the promoters for continued lapses by the listed entity.

There are several other implications of being a promoter or promoter group entity, transactions by such entities with the listed entity are mandatorily treated as related party transactions, public disclosures on sale of shares. There are several sections of the Companies Act, 2013 (“Act”) as well, which impose liabilities, including criminal liabilities, on promoters. Some of these provisions are section 7 (imposing criminal liability for incorporation related offenses), of the Act, if it is found that the company has been incorporated by furnishing any false information or representation or by suppression of any material information, the promoters would be held liable for action under section 447. Further, section 34 elaborates that if any statement in the prospectus is untrue or misleading, the promoter will be held criminally liable under Section 447. On the same lines, section 35 (imposing civil liability for public issue related mis-statements), section 42 (imposing penalty for contravening the provisions w.r.t private placement including default in filing of return of allotment), section 102 (imposing penalty for non-disclosure / wrongful disclosure in the explanatory statement), 284 (liability with respect to non-cooperation with liquidator) to list a few.

This article focuses on who is a promoter/promoter group entity (PGE), what are the implications of being either, how does one get out of the classification, having been into either, both in case of listed and unlisted companies.

Read more

FAQs on Purpose and Effect test for RPTs

-Team Vinod Kothari and Company | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [316.51 KB]

For further reading on the topic –

Purpose and Effect Test for Related Party Transactions.

Team Corplaw | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [1.84 MB]

Further reading on the topic –

Workshop on Purpose and Effect Test for RPTs

For understanding the intricacies, laying systems and implementing

Register here: https://forms.gle/uX6cFio1UVjxCcsW8
Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [185.39 KB]

Read our related resources

Compliance from Boardroom perspective under SEBI LODR

– Vinita Nair, Senior Partner | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [1.97 MB]

SEBI proposes to give more teeth to minority shareholders

– Ajay Ramanathan, Executive | ajay@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [188.37 KB]

Comments on SEBI consultation paper on CG norms in HVDLEs

– Team Corplaw | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [212.00 KB]

Read our write ups on the said consultation paper:

  1. SEBI to provide debenture holders the right to object material related party transactions
  2. SEBIs Consultation Paper on review of CG norms for a High Value Debt Listed Entities

Recent amendments relating to Corporate Bonds

– Vinita Nair, Aanchal Kaur Nagpal & Payal Agarwal | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [2.03 MB]

Read our related resources here :

  1. Debenture trustees’ nominees on Corporate Boards: FAQs
  2. SEBI Consultation Paper on NCS regulations: Changes in Offer Doc. | Mandatory Listing | Disclosure of Issue expense
  3. SEBIs Consultation Paper on review of CG norms for a High Value Debt Listed Entities
  4. SEBI to provide debenture holders the right to object material related party transactions

SEBI proposes freezing of CEOs’ personal shareholding for continuing default of Regs & fine

– Sharon Pinto & Ajay Ramanathan | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [211.20 KB]

Debenture trustees’ nominees on Corporate Boards: FAQs

– Team Corplaw | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Table of Contents

Appointment of Nominee directorDisqualification under CA, 2013
Resignation, removalRoles, responsibilities and liability
Board compositionApplicability and immediate actionable under present amendment

Brief Introduction

A Nominee Director is a representative of a stakeholder/ stakeholder group (“nominator”), put by the nominator on the board of a company, to ensure that the interests of the nominator, and the general interests of the Company, are safeguarded. While, the enabling provisions for appointment of nominee director is primarily set out in Sec. 161(3) of CA, 2013 authorisation in the Articles of Association of the Company is a prerequisite. Under CA, 2013 the power to appoint director vests with shareholders. The Board has the power to appoint an additional director, alternate director and a nominee director only where specifically authorised under the AOA.

A nominee director is a director, and therefore, except for specific provisions of law, articles or the terms of the agreement under which the right of nomination comes, the position, appointment process, etc.,  of the nominee director are the same as those of any director. The similarities and the differences are tabulated as under:

Read more