FAQs on Default Loss Guarantee in Digital Lending

/6 Comments/in , , , /by

An understanding of the Guidelines issued by RBI

(Updated as on April 29, 2024)

Team Finserv | finserv@vinodkothari.com

On September 02, 2022, the RBI issued the “Guidelines on Digital Lending” (“DL Guidelines”), which had essentially put a bar on “Loss sharing/ structured default guarantee arrangements” such as First Loss Default Guarantees, likening their nature to that of “synthetic securitisation” as defined under the Master Direction – Reserve Bank of India (Securitisation of Standard Assets) Directions, 2021 (“SSA Directions”). This caused a disruption in the digital lending industry as most of the arrangements ran on some form of loss-sharing arrangement. (Refer to our FAQs on the Digital Lending Guidelines here)

In its Statement on Developmental and Regulatory Policies dated June 8, 2023, the RBI announced its intention to issue a regulatory framework for permitting Default Loss Guarantee arrangements in Digital Lending[1]. The same day, the Guidelines on Default Loss Guarantee (DLG) in Digital Lending have been issued by the regulator (‘DLG Guidelines’).

We have developed a set of FAQs on the DLG Guidelines, where we intend to answer some of the critical questions relating to the default guarantee arrangements. The FAQs were updated based the RBI FAQs on DLG Guidelines (‘RBI FAQs)  issued on Apr 26, 2024.

Read more →

RBI to release guidelines to permit default guarantees

/0 Comments/in , , , , /by

The evolution of a concept, from its inception to being prohibited, and ultimately establishing a regulatory framework to allow its practice

– Anita Baid (finserv@vinodkothari.com)

The concept of First Loss Default Guarantees (FLDGs) in the financial industry has experienced a remarkable journey, marked by its inception, subsequent prohibition, and eventually being on the verge of a resurgence with the introduction of a regulatory framework. It had gained significant attention in the realm of fintech industry, whose remarkable expansion in India is largely responsible for propelling FLDGs. Nevertheless, it is essential to note that guarantees are not a novel concept; they have been widely employed in the financial sector for a considerable period of time. (Our article on ‘Lending without risk and risk without lending’ can be read here)

In its Statement on Developmental and Regulatory Policies dated June 8, 2023, the RBI has announced its intention to issue a regulatory framework for permitting Default Loss Guarantee arrangements in Digital Lending. This article delves into the intriguing evolution of Structured Default Guarantees, examining their rise, fall, and subsequent rebirth, shedding light on the regulatory landscape that has shaped their existence.

Read more →

GoAir Insolvency: Lessors’ rights gone in thin air?

/1 Comment/in , , , /by

– Financial Services Division, finserv@vinodkothari.com

A Special Bench of NCLT,  New Delhi admitted the insolvency of Go Airlines (India) Ltd, popularly known as GoAir, on the 10th May 2023. The insolvency was admitted on an application of the company itself, on the ground of a self-admitted default of Rs. 11.03 crores towards interest to financial creditors, out of a pile of debt, that is, Rs. 2660 cr towards aircraft lessors and Rs. 1202 cr towards its vendors. The application was admitted in the face of strong opposition by the financial creditors and the lessors of aircrafts taken on lease by the company.

Subsequently, on an appeal before the NCLAT, the appellate forum affirmed the order of the NCLT, rejecting the contention that the filing of the insolvency application was malicious. The matter may still be taken up to higher or other forums, but in the meantime, there are question marks on India as a favoured jurisdiction for aircraft leasing. Aircraft lessors need certainty as to the exercise of their rights over the leased aircraft in the event of a lessee default, and the Cape Town Convention (CTC), signed under the auspices of UNIDROIT way back in 2021, is a set of minimum assurances that the countries signing that convention have provided to aircraft lessors. The question is, India having actually been a signatory to the Convention, is it okay to have stayed the rights of the lessors by way of a moratorium during the entire period of insolvency resolution?

Read more →