Posts

Speedy rights issue in 23 working days from BM

-Sakshi Patil, Executive | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [147.80 KB]

Our related resources:

  1. Highlights of SEBI’s temporary relaxations for Rights Issue
  2. Eligibility and disclosures under rights issue rationalized

Research Analysts v/s Investment Advisors – Is the Line Blurring ?

Last updated on 1st October, 2024

– Payal Agarwal, Associate and Dayita Kanodia, Executive | finserv@vinodkothari.com 

An investment in knowledge pays the best interest

Benjamin Franklin

Investment advisors and research analysts, including the unregistered ones have been on SEBI’s radar for quite some time. As per latest data available on SEBI’s website (30th September, 2024), there are 953 Investment Advisors1 and 1358 Research Analysts2 registered with SEBI. Following the consultation paper on review of regulatory framework for investment advisors and research analysts SEBI, in its Board meeting on 30th September, 2024, has approved many of these proposals. While some proposals are aimed at an ease of registration for an entity/ person as an RA/ IA, the CP also contained substantial proposals w.r.t. the activities and functioning of IAs and RAs. 

In this article, we discuss the broad concept of IAs and RAs and a few major proposals under the CP, with our analysis on the potential implications. The fine text of the Amendment Regulations is awaited, for getting the necessary clarity on the position of IAs and RAs, pursuant to the revised regulatory framework.

Read more

Making life easy for listed entities: SEBI proposes action on Expert Committee recommendations

– Team Corplaw (corplaw@vinodkothari.com)

Last updated on October 02, 2024

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [308.46 KB]

AIFs ail SEBI: Cannot be used for regulatory breach

Vinod Kothari | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

The alternative investment management industry in India works in the form alternative investment funds (AIFs), a SEBI-regulated vehicle. Most of the PE, VC funds, and hedge funds in India work in this mode.

AIFs have recently been at the receiving end of regulatory flak. RBI had expressed concerns on use of AIFs by regulated lenders for evergreening, and prohibited regulated entities from making any investment in such AIFs as have investments in their borrowers.

Now, SEBI, vide a Consultation Paper dated 19th January heaped a bunch of similar concerns, and required AIFs to affirm that the AIF or investments therein are not being used for regulatory breaches. These concerns, SEBI says, are a result of an ongoing thematic check on the AIF industry, and SEBI says it has already detected at least 40 cases, involving AUM over Rs 30000 crores, where the structure was used to create dents in existing financial regulations.

Based on Data relating to activities of Alternative Investment Funds (AIFs)

The AIF industry has demonstrated steady growth in recent years. As of September 2023, the assets under management (AUM) of AIFs have surged to 3.88 lakh crores, a substantial increase from the 13,000 crores recorded in September 2015. [See Graph above].   

Read more

SEBI proposes to ease compliance for issuers of non-convertible securities (NCS) | Consultation Paper

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [112.07 KB]

SEBI Consultation Paper (CP) to curb association of SEBI Registered Intermediaries (RIs) with unregistered Finfluencers

– Sanya Agrawal | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [143.90 KB]

Our detailed article on the topic can be read here

Proposal to designate a Research Analyst Administration & Supervisory Body to administer and supervise the RAs: SEBI Consultation Paper dated 22.08.2023

– Neha Malu, Senior Executive | Corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [174.01 KB]

SEBI intends to rationalize public issuances: Issues Consultation Paper on amendments in ICDR Regulations

– Shaivi Bhamaria and Ajay Ramanathan | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [151.10 KB]

Consultation Paper on ESG Disclosures, Ratings and Investing by Mutual Funds

– Payal Agarwal & Shreya Salampuria | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [727.77 KB]

SEBI’s revised framework brings relaxation under buy-back norms

– Promotes tender offer while holding back significant corporate slimming proposals

– Payal Agarwal, Deputy Manager (payal@vinodkothari.com)

Distribution of profits to shareholders may take up various forms, as also discussed in Distribution of accumulated profits to shareholders. One such manner of distribution is “buying back” the existing securities of the company from the shareholders. In addition to the provisions of section 68 of the Companies Act, 2013[1] (“the Act”), the provisions of SEBI (Buyback of Securities) Regulations, 2018 (“Buy-back Regulations”) are also applicable in case of buy-back of shares or other specified securities of a listed company. The Buy-back Regulations repealed the erstwhile Buyback Regulations, 1998 and our article on the same can be read at SEBI amends Buyback Regulations: -Aligning and re-framing with other laws. SEBI had brought a consultation paper on review of existing Buy-back Regulations (“Consultation Paper”) on 16th November, 2022. The Consultation Paper, based on a report of a sub-group headed by Mr Keki Mistry, makes some very significant recommendations for reform of the existing buy-back regime, including some statutory amendments too. On the basis of the suggestions received on the Consultation Paper, SEBI, in its meeting held on 20th December, 2022 (“Board Meeting”) approved amendments to the Buy-back Regulations.

The amendments have been notified on 7th February, 2023 vide SEBI (Buy-back of Securities) (Amendment) Regulations, 2023 (“Amendment Regulations”), and are applicable w.e.f. 30th day from publication in Official Gazette, being 9th March, 2023.

Various amendments have been notified  to the existing Buy-back Regulations with the intent of removing the inefficiency of certain modes of buy-back, streamlining the timelines, assisting efficient price-discovery mechanisms and defying the prospects of manipulative market practices.

While most of the proposals under the Consultation Paper have been made part of the Buy-back Regulations through the Amendment Regulations, certain proposals such as scaling up the extent of permitted limits of buy-back or proposals on the tax treatment etc have been dropped currently, since the same may also require consent of other regulatory authorities such as MCA, MoF etc. and amendments to other related laws. The agenda note of the Board Meeting (“Agenda Note”) also specifies that SEBI will engage with MCA and MoF respectively to seek their views on such proposals. In this write-up, we attempt to put up an analysis of the amended regulatory framework  with respect to the buy-back of securities by listed companies.

Modes of buy-back

Reg 4(iv) of the Buy-back Regulations specifies various methods for buyback of securities being –

Source: SEBI website
  1. Tender offer to existing shareholders on a proportionate basis;
  2. Open market mechanism through
    1. Book building process
    2. Stock exchange
  3. Purchase of shares from odd-lot holders

The market practice, as can be understood from the data available on the website of SEBI, tender offer is by far the most preferred method for buy-back of securities[2]. The same derives its preference from the fact that the same provides a chance of equal participation by all shareholders, since the repurchase takes place on a proportionate basis from all those shareholders who tender their shares for buyback.

On the other hand, open market buy-back, especially through stock exchanges, has been criticized due to several limitations. The Consultation Paper also discussed the existing limitations in the method and proposed gradual removal of the process, by way of a proposed “glide path”.

The existing book building process through open market mechanism is also a rarely used method, and a revision to the entire process of the same was also proposed vide  the Consultation Paper.

The method of buy-back through purchase from odd lot holders has been omitted from the Buy-back Regulations in view of the absence of any practical relevance of the same.

“Glide path” exit for open market buy-backs through stock exchanges

The method for buy-back of securities from open market through stock exchanges suffers various limitations, for instance –

  • It runs contrary to the principle of equitable treatment to all shareholders, since there is no concept of proportionate participation, and limited opportunities for shareholders to participate.
  • An artificial demand may be created during the buy-back period that exaggerates the prices of shares and prevents efficient price discovery.
  • The same may be instrumental in manipulating the market for the securities of a company.

In view of the inherent limitations of the mechanism, it was proposed to reduce the maximum limit of buy-back and the offer period for buyback through such offer, in a phased manner, such that the same can be completely discontinued with effect from 1st April, 2025. The phases of the  “glide path” is as follows –

ParameterCurrent thresholdsw.e.f April 01, 2023w.e.f April 01, 2024w.e.f April 01, 2025
Maximum Limit15%10%5%0%
Time Period for completion of buyback offer6 months66 working days  22 working daysNA

One may doubt the possibility of availing the mode for buy-back through stock exchange in the event the closing of such offer extends to a period on or after 1st April, 2025. To this end, it has been expressly clarified that such option will still be available where the buy-back offer has been opened or before 31st March, 2025. Therefore, it may be said that the maximum thresholds and time limits for buy-back through stock exchanges will be applicable on the basis of provisions as on the opening of the offer, and not the closing. 

Apart from the gradual closure of the method, some other amendments have also been notified till the time the same is existent.

Other amendments to open market buy-back through stock exchanges

The other changes proposed to the aforesaid method are as follows –

  • Separate window for buy-back through stock exchanges – An explanation has been inserted to clause (i) of Reg 16 of the Buy-back Regulations requiring creation of a separate window by the concerned stock exchange for facilitating buy-back through stock exchanges. The creation of a separate window was proposed to avoid the confusion among the shareholders as  to  whether  shares sold  by  the  shareholders on the stock exchange platform have been accepted under buy-back offer or if they were sold in open market.
  • Restricted to only frequently traded securities – Till the time the method of buy-back through stock exchanges continues, the same will be limited only to the frequently traded shares, since no price-discovery can practically take place for infrequently traded stocks, which form the base of open market buy-back through stock exchanges. The meaning of “frequently traded securities” shall be derived from the SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Securities and Takeover) Regulations, 2011.
  • Volume and price related restrictions – The Amendment Regulations specify that the buy-back through stock exchanges shall also be subject to the restrictions on placement of bids, price and volume as specified by SEBI. The restrictions will be notified separately through specific circulars to this effect.

Amendments pertaining to buy-back through tender offer

The Amendment Regulations contain various provisions pertaining to the buy-back through tender offer. These are mostly aimed towards increasing the efficiency of the process and providing operational convenience to listed companies, while also providing for a time-efficient process for the same.

Revision of offer price to make the offer lucrative

The existing Buy-back Regulations does not facilitate the possibility of any subsequent revision in the buy-back price, than what is proposed in the explanatory statement at the time of obtaining shareholders’ approval. However, there is a time gap between the board/ shareholders’ approval and the actual commencement of buy-back offer. This time gap may demand some revision in the buy-back price in order to retain the attractiveness of the offer.

Therefore, clause (via) has been inserted under Reg 5 of the Buy-back Regulations to provide flexibility to the board of directors to make upward revision in the buy-back price and accordingly, decrease the maximum number of securities proposed to be bought back, till one working day prior to the opening of the buy-back offer, subject to the aggregate buy-back size remaining unchanged.

Doing away with review of letter of offer by SEBI

The extant Buy-back Regulations required review of the draft letter of offer by SEBI. The comments are required to be incorporated by the merchant bankers in the final letter of offer. This being a time-consuming process, the said requirement has been removed.

The Amendment Regulations require a company to file the final letter of offer to SEBI through a merchant banker not being an associate of the company. Further, the merchant banker is required to provide a certification with respect to the compliance with the Buy-back Regulations and the contents of the letter of offer are in conformity with the requirements of the Buy-back Regulations.

Mode of dispatch of letter of offer

The explanation to clause (ii) of Reg 9 of the Buy-back Regulations has been amended to provide more clarity on the mode of dispatch of letter of offer to the shareholders of the company. The Amendment Regulations require that the public announcement shall disclose that the dispatch of letter of offer shall be made in electronic mode, within 2 working days from the record date. Physical copies of the same shall also be provided to the shareholder who requests for the same.

Reduction in timelines for tender offer

The Amendment Regulations also provide for certain changes in the existing timelines for buy-back through tender offer. The same is aimed at accelerating the entire process of buy-back through tender offer. This includes the following –

  • The offer opening date has been reduced from “five working days from the date of dispatch of the letter of offer” to “four working days from the record date” (also applicable to buy-back through stock exchanges).
  • The offer period has been reduced from “ten working days” to “five working days”.
  • The timeline for payment of consideration to the shareholders whose shares have been bought back has been reduced from existing “seven working days from closure of offer” to “five working days from closure of offer”.

Post the Amendment Regulations coming into force, the timelines for the process of buy-back through tender offer will stand amended in the following manner (refer pg. 28 of the Agenda Note).

Broad activityExisting timelinesAmended timelines (in working days)
Public announcementTT
Submission of draft offer letter to SEBIT+7NA
Receipt of observations from SEBI (tentative)T+14NA
Record dateRR = T+9 (7 working days in advance excluding date of intimation and record date)
Last day for dispatch of offer letter to shareholdersT+19R+2 = T+11
Opening of offerT+24R+4 = T+13
Closure of offerT+34T+18 (offer opening + 5)
Last day for payment of consideration to shareholdersT+41T+23

Clarificatory changes to the maximum permitted buy-back size

While the Consultation Paper contained proposals for increasing the limits of the maximum permissible buy-back size as well as number of times such an offer can be made, the same does not form part of the currently notified Amendment Regulations.

However, certain amendments have been notified for the sake of clarity in the existing Buy-back Regulations –

  • It is clarified that the buy-back size limits have to be taken on a standalone or consolidated basis, whichever is lower, through an amendment to clause (i) of Reg 4 of the Buy-back Regulations. Further, the condition on debt-equity ratio is also required to be compiled with on a standalone or consolidated basis, whichever is lower [clause (ii) of Reg 4 of the Buy-back Regulations].
  • It is clarified that the maximum number of equity shares that can be bought back in a financial year remains 25% of the company’s total paid-up equity capital.

Amendments  pertaining to open market buy-back through book-building process

As discussed above, buy-back through the book building process is currently a rarely used process. The Agenda Note (refer pg. 24) also states that except for one company in the year 1988, no other company has undertaken buy-back through this route till date. In view of the same, a revised framework has been proposed in relation to buy-back through the book building process. Following the recommendations laid down in the Consultation Paper, the Amendment Regulations provide a revised mechanism for effecting open market buy-back through the book building process. The major revisions include –

  • The timelines have been prescribed for various events such as making of public announcement, commencement of buy-back offer, intimation to stock exchanges, sending notices to shareholders regarding commencement of buy-back, payment of consideration etc.
  • It prescribes additional disclosures required to be made in the public announcement in accordance with Schedule II and Schedule VI to amended Buy-back Regulations.
  • It specifies the manner in which the buy-back price is discovered under the book-building process.
  • The minimum period for buy-back is reduced to 2 working days instead of existing 15 days.
  • The promoters along with their associates shall not be allowed to participate in buy-back through book-building process.
Amended mechanism for buy-back through book building

Amendments applicable to all modes of buy-back

Modes and timelines for creation of escrow account

Under the extant Buy-back Regulations, the buy-back consideration is required to be deposited in the escrow account either in the form of cash or through permitted forms other than cash, on or before the opening of the offer. The same has been amended to require a company to make such a deposit within two working days of the public announcement.

Certain additional forms/modes of deposit have also been prescribed to provide flexibility to the company to commit its security for performance of its obligations towards the buy-back. The amended sub-clause (c) of clause (xi) of Reg 9 reads as –

“(i)cash deposited with cash including bank deposits deposited with any scheduled commercial bank or

(ii)bank guarantee issued in favour of the merchant banker by any scheduled commercial bank, or

(iii)deposit of frequently traded and freely transferable equity shares or other freely transferable securities , or

(iiia) government securities, or

 (iiib) units of mutual funds invested in gilt funds and overnight schemes, or

(iv)a combination of above”

For such part of escrow account that is held in a form other than cash, the company is also required to “deposit with a scheduled commercial bank, in cash, a sum of not less than two and half per cent of the total amount earmarked for buyback as specified in the resolution of the Board of Directors or the special resolution, as the case may be, as security for the fulfillment of its obligations under the regulations”. Prior to the Amendment Regulations, the same read as “one percent of the total consideration payable”.

In view of the various post buy-back compliances applicable on a company, the minimum required validity of the bank guarantee has been extended to the LATER of –

  • 30 days after the expiry of buy-back period, or
  • Completion of all obligations under the Buy-back Regulations

Standardization of timelines

The reference of days, wherever it appears, have been replaced with “working days” to bring about a consistency and streamline the timelines. Further, the timelines for various actionables such as public announcement, deposit in escrow account etc have been amended in alignment of the same with the existing timelines under the SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Securities and Takeover Regulations), 2011, SEBI (Delisting of Equity Shares) Regulations, 2021 etc.

Mode of dissemination of public announcement

The extant Regulations required the public announcement for buy-back be published in at least one English National Daily, one Hindi National Daily and one Regional language daily, all with wide circulation at the place where the Registered Office of the company is situated. Further, the same was required to be submitted to SEBI, through the merchant banker.

Along with the newspaper publications of the public announcement, the Amendment Regulations require the filing of the same by the Company directly to the SEBI as well as the stock exchanges on which its shares or other specified securities are listed. The same will also be published on the website of the stock exchanges, the company as well as the merchant banker.

Dispensing with the requirement of physical submission

The Amendment Regulations have the impact of dispensing with the existing requirement of submission of physical documents with SEBI, and substituting the same with the requirement of filing in electronic form digitally signed by the Company Secretary or the person authorized by the board of the company undertaking buy-back.

Specification of consent requirements

Where the buy-back offer of a company requires approval from its lenders, the same shall be specified in the public announcement, offer letter and explanatory statement to the shareholders. Prior written consent of the lenders is also required to be obtained in case of breach of any covenant with such lender.

Role of Secretarial Auditor

The reference to the Statutory Auditor has been replaced with Secretarial Auditor for ensuring the following compliances –

  • Extinguishment of the certificates of the securities bought back by a company;
  • Certification of the extinguishment of securities certificates.

The same has been done in view of the fact that the secretarial auditor is required to ensure compliance in terms of SEBI regulations and other allied laws, and therefore, would be better placed to ensure post buy-back compliances.

Increase in the minimum amount to be utilized for buy-back

The existing Buy-back Regulations require at least 50% of the earmarked buy-back amount (kept in a separate escrow account), to be actually utilized for the buy-back offer, failure of which attracts forfeiture of a percentage of the escrow amount. The forfeiture is subject to certain exemptions such as for instances where the buy-back offer becomes unattractive to the shareholders due to price, or otherwise, for any other reason not in the control of the company such as non-receipt of sufficient interest for buy-back from the existing shareholders.

In view of the foregoing exemptions, the minimum utilization amount has been increased to 75% of the earmarked amount, instead of the existing 50% threshold. Further, on the Amendment Regulations becoming effective, the company shall be required to ensure that at least 40% of the earmarked amount is utilized within the initial half of the specified duration.

The same is applicable to open market buy-back offers either through stock exchange or book-building.

Conclusion

The Amendment Regulations are mostly inclined towards providing a more efficient process for buy-back of securities of listed companies and do away with the existing loopholes in the same. It seeks to provide convenience to the listed companies on one hand, while ensuring no compromise with the stakeholders’, especially the public shareholders’ interests on the other. Some of the most welcoming proposals under the Consultation Paper have currently been dropped, particularly,  the proposal for increase in limits of maximum buy-back size, which, if implemented, would have resulted in  many matured companies to distribute their surplus funds effectively to the existing shareholders and scale down appropriately. The same is pending consultation with the respective ministries.


[1] The provisions of allied rule (Rule 17 of the Share Capital and Debentures Rules) does not apply to listed companies, except pertaining to the filing of declaration of solvency and return of buy-back.

[2] Buy-back from the open market through stock exchange stands at 519 as opposed to 1269 instances of buy-back through tender offer. Source: SEBI website