3 Ss of Credit Risk Distribution: Selling, Sharing and Substitution

– Anita Baid & Dayita Kanodia | finserv@vinodkothari.com

Guide to loan transfers, balance transfers and loan syndications

Nothing lasts forever. Not the good things, not the bad. So just find what makes you happy, and do it for as long as you can – Ashley Poston.

Background

Loans originated by lenders are not always meant to be retained forever. Banks routinely downsell, share, or reshuffle credit exposures to manage liquidity, optimize balance sheets, rebalance risk, or execute strategic exits. Sometimes, borrowers also change their lenders. This practice has existed all over the world.

This article explores three commonly used and often confused mechanisms of credit risk distribution: transfer of loan exposures, balance transfers and loan syndication arrangements. While the primary objective of each of these modes is the redistribution or sharing of credit risk, they represent fundamentally distinct commercial and regulatory mechanisms. A bank’s strategic choices amongst these options is determined by its specific objectives- whether managing an existing portfolio, or responding to a borrower’s demand, or structuring a large and complex funding transaction. 

Transfer of Loan Exposures

Concept and Purpose

Transfer of loan exposures refers to the transfer of economic interest in the whole or a part of the  loan exposure, with or without transfer of the underlying loan contract, by the transferor to the transferee. This mechanism enables banks to rebalance portfolios, release capital and manage sectoral or borrower exposures. From the transferor’s perspective, it is initiated and driven by portfolio management strategies. From the transferee’s perspective, it is a case of inorganic portfolio growth.

Under the Transfer and Distribution of Credit Risk Directions (‘TDCR Directions’), loan transfers may be undertaken through:

1. Assignment
2. Novation
3. Loan participation

Key Regulatory Features

1. Transfers may involve standard (not in default) or stressed loans, with separate regulatory treatment for each.
2. For standard loans, a Minimum Holding Period (MHP) applies (three or six months depending on tenor).
3. Transfer must be on a cash basis and at arm’s length.
4. Credit enhancements or implicit guarantees by lenders are prohibited.
5. For stressed loans, only assignment or novation is permitted, and price discovery mechanisms such as the Swiss Challenge method may apply.

Balance Transfers

Concept and Nature

A balance transfer refers to the transfer of a borrower’s loan account from one lender to another at the request or instance of the borrower. Unlike portfolio-driven loan transfers, balance transfers are borrower-centric, typically motivated by better pricing, collateral turnover (for example, sale of the underlying collateral),  or improved service (such as a change of borrower location).

Under the RBI framework, balance transfers fall under Chapter III of Part C of the TDCR Directions- ‘Transfer of Borrower Accounts at the Request/Instance of Borrower’, and are excluded from the applicability of the norms for transfer of loan exposures. Our detailed write-up on balance transfers can be seen here. 

Key Regulatory Features

1. It is the borrower who initiates requests for such loan transfers.
2. The transfer does not represent a credit risk distribution exercise initiated by the lender.
3. The incoming lender undertakes full due diligence and originates the exposure afresh.
4. Minimum holding period norms as applicable to loan transfers do not apply.

Loan Syndication

Loan syndication is a form of multiple-lender arrangement, where a group of lenders jointly finance large exposure to a  single borrower under a common framework. One lender, known as the arranging bank or lead underwriter, structures the facility and distributes portions of the loan to participating lenders. Loan syndication is commonly used for complex corporate, infrastructure, and project finance exposures.

ASC ASC 310-20-20 has loan syndication as 

A transaction in which several lenders share in lending to a single borrower. Each lender loans a specific amount to the borrower and has the right to repayment from the borrower. It is common for groups of lenders to jointly fund those loans when the amount borrowed is greater than any one lender is willing to lend.

Further, ASC 860-10-55-4 provides that loan syndication is not a transfer of a financial asset. It may be noted that ASC ASC 310-20-20 defines loan participation as a transaction in which a single lender makes a large loan to a borrower and subsequently transfers undivided interests in the loan to groups of banks or other entities. Thus, there is a clear distinction between loan syndication and loan participation, wherein the latter refers to the arrangement whereby the loan is transferred subsequently, as against the former, which provides for origination by all the lenders under the syndication arrangement jointly. 

Additionally, as per ASC 310-10-25-4, 

Each lender in a syndication shall account for the amounts it is owed by the borrower. Repayments by the borrower may be made to a lead lender that then distributes the collections to the other lenders of the syndicate. In those circumstances, the lead lender is simply functioning as a servicer and, therefore, shall not recognize the aggregate loan as an asset.

As per a McKinsey report, the loan syndication market was 760 Million USD as of 2022. Further, as per the Syndicated Loans Market Report 2025, the loan syndication market size reached 682.44 Billion USD in 2024 and is expected to grow at a CAGR of 14.5% to 1336.2 Billion USD in 2029. 

Loan syndication vs Co-lending

In syndicated lending, the entire borrower interface is carried by the leader of the syndicate; those who agree to take part in the syndicate or consortium take share in the loan rely on the lead role taken by the leader. Further, syndicated lending has existed for sharing exposures in large loans. Co-lending seems similar to loan syndications; however, the former is a horizontal network of lenders, whereby the co-lenders have typically been involved in the loan origination right from the inception. Syndication may have the similar ex-ante feature of co-lending but it differs from the latter given that each lender becomes a separate lender. In practice, co-lending has been more popular in the context of retail loans. 

Key Regulatory Features

1. Banks which are a part of such syndicated arrangements must develop appropriate procedures and mechanisms.
2. The Minimum Holding Period requirement does not apply.
3. There should be adequate mechanisms for the sharing of information among the parties
4. Risk sharing is based on pre-agreed proportions, and lenders retain exposure until repayment or permitted exit.
5. Legal documentation ensures common terms, inter-creditor arrangements, and enforcement mechanisms.

Process Flow

The loan syndication process would usually involve the following steps:

1. Funding Need: A borrower recognises funding need and approaches a bank to arrange the finance, acting as a lead arranger. 
2. Structuring Loan Proposal: The lead arranger assesses the needs of the borrower and evaluates the feasibility. Accordingly, a potential loan proposal with the key terms is created. 
3. Syndication: The lead bank reaches out to the other lenders to join in the loan. 
4. Due diligence: Each lender will conduct due diligence on the borrower’s financial stability and creditworthiness before committing to the syndication.
5. Execution of the Loan Agreement: The lead arranger executes the loan agreement with the borrower and funds are disbursed. 
6. Monitoring and administration: The lead arranger continues to monitor the performance of the borrower, share relevant information with the other lenders and ensure loan servicing as well.

Though the above process is commonly practised, it is also seen that at times other lenders under the syndication arrangement are made a part of the arrangements after a brief gap from the date of loan origination. Thus, initially, one partner bank disburses the entire loan after performing credit underwriting, and subsequently, other lenders take their share of the loan. In certain cases, the time gap can also exceed up to six months from the date of origination. This raises a question as to why it is not considered by default a case of loan transfer but is instead exempted from regulatory provisions of TLE and requirements of MHP. The argument in favour of the same would be that since the loan was originated on the understanding that there will be a syndicate of lenders lending it, and the borrower is aware of the same, it is not “transfer” per se, as the intent is not to downsell or transfer credit risk subsequently. In fact, the loan originated with the understanding to syndicate.

Operational Challenges

There is no regulatory process prescribed for loan syndication by banks. The RBI has permitted banks to evolve appropriate mechanisms for adopting a sole bank, multiple bank, consortium or syndication approach, by framing necessary ground rules on operational aspects. In the absence of a unified framework, there is a possibility of diversified practices prevailing in the market. This was not the scenario earlier, RBI had specifically laid down prescriptions for joint lending by banks which were then withdrawn in October 1996 with a view to improve flexibility. 

Subsequently, some high value frauds came to light after such withdrawal of the regulatory prescriptions wherein the Central Vigilance Commission and other authorities attributed the incidents of frauds mainly to lack of effective sharing of information about the credit history and conduct of account of the borrowers amongst various lending institutions. This had led RBI to examine the matter in consultation with IBA and conclude that there was a need for improving the sharing/dissemination of information among the banks about the borrower.  Accordingly, detailed guidelines were issued by RBI on 10/02/2009 to banks to strengthen their information back-up about the borrowers enjoying credit facilities with multiple banks. Accordingly, regulatory prescriptions regarding joint lending were reintroduced. 

However, the current regulations on syndicated arrangements focus on the framing of policies and mechanisms by banks for syndicated arrangements.

At a Glance

Basis for distinction	Loan transfers	Balance Transfer	Loan Syndication
Initiated by	Lender	Borrower	Joint Lenders
Exposure	Transfer of existing exposure	Closure of old loan and origination of new loan	Joint originations
Transfer of Economic Interest	Partial or full	No transfer of economic interest	No, shared from inception
Legal Ownership	May or may not transfer	Transferred to the new lender	Each lender holds direct ownership
Modus operandi	Assignment, Novation or Loan Participation	Origination of a new loan, proceeds used for the closure of the existing	Master Agreement and deed of adherence
Borrower Consent	Required; Generally taken as a part of the loan agreement itself	It is the borrower who requests the transfer	Taken at the time of origination itself, and with the borrower’s active involvement
Minimum Holding Period	Applicable	Not Applicable	Not Applicable
Applicable RBI Framework	Part A of TDCR Directions	Chapter III of Part C of the TDCR Directions	Chapter I of Part C of the TDCR Directions

In addition to these three modes of credit risk distribution, other instruments such as Credit Default Swaps and Inter–bank Participation Certificates (IBPCs) may also be used. The former refers to the arrangement whereby the buyer of protection pays a premium to the seller in exchange for protection against a defined credit event (e.g., default) of a reference entity. On the other hand, IBPCs are instruments through which one bank (the originating bank) transfers a portion of a loan exposure to another bank (the participating bank), without assigning the underlying loan to the latter.

---

Read More:

1. The will of the borrower: Do Balance Transfers Count as Loan Transfers?
2. Inter-lender balance transfer of loans: understanding the nuances
3. SOSTRA: The New shastra of liquidating Non-performing loans
4. RBI amends TLE Directions