Posts

Delegation of powers by Board made prescriptive yet principle based

Governance Directions of Banks set to be amended effective September 1, 2026

– Vinita Nair and Saloni Khant |  finserv@vinodkothari.com

RBI continues its drive of regulatory reforms for the banking sector, with the recent one being the amendment proposed in the governance directions applicable to commercial banks i.e. Draft Reserve Bank of India (Commercial Banks – Governance) Amendment Directions, 2026 (Draft Directions) relating to policy and non-policy matters placed before the Board for approval, review, information etc. proposed to be made applicable from September 1, 2026. As indicated in RBI’s Statement on Developmental and Regulatory Policies, RBI has undertaken comprehensive review and rationalization of all earlier instructions in an endeavor to enable Boards to utilize its time effectively, and to facilitate a more focused and qualitative engagement on strategy and risk governance.

While, the Draft Directions provide a compilation of matters to be placed before the Board and those that can be delegated to a specific committee or any committee of board/ management, it also provides the principles to be considered by the board while delegating the matters thereby ensuring the adequate oversight of the board  on delegated matters. The amendment would primarily affect the manner in which information is placed before the board of banks, manner and extent of delegation of their powers to committees of board and/or management and reporting requirements for such matters.

The Draft Directions are applicable to both public sector banks and private sector banks.

In this piece, the authors analyse the proposed amendment, impact and indicate the likely actionables for Banks if the amendment is notified as is.

The Role of the Board

The Board of a Bank is expected to majorly focus on overseeing the risk profile of the Bank, monitoring the integrity of its business and control mechanisms, ensuring the expert management, and maximising the interests of its stakeholders. The Board always had the power to delegate certain items to management and board committees, in some cases by way of express provisions in RBI directions, guidelines. But at the same time, it must set and enforce clear lines of responsibility and accountability for itself as well as the senior management.

The Draft Directions draw a clear line between the matters to be dealt by the Board and the matters which can be delegated to committees with only material matters being placed before the Board. Further, a principle based approach is provided for the manner in which information is placed before the Board.

Principle Based Approach for matters to be placed before the Board

The objective of these principles is for the Board to consciously examine the areas where it devotes its valuable time and expertise. The principles require the Board to document express guidelines on the manner in which information is being placed before it.

The board is required to clearly articulate the matters reserved for its approval or to be brought to its notice for information or reporting, based on applicable laws and define the nature, level of detail and frequency of information required from the management. To optimize the time of the Board for real value addition, the chairperson of the Board shall have the primary responsibility of setting the agenda of the meeting.

The matters being placed before it or the Board committees, sub-committees or senior management must be reviewed periodically. This would enable the Board to examine and revoke delegation or further delegate responsibilities wherever required. The review must be detailed enough to include the timelines for circulation of agenda items, adequacy of information captured in the agenda, time allotted for important matters, etc.

The Powers of Delegation

The RBI (Commercial Banks – Governance) Directions, 2025 (existing Directions) provide for delegation of specific items viz. reviews dealing with various performance areas, monitoring of the exposures (both credit and investment) of the bank, review of the adequacy of the risk management process and upgradation thereof, internal control system, ensuring compliance with the statutory / regulatory framework, etc. to a Committee of Board. For ease of reference, the Draft Directions compile as well as draw a clear line between the matters to be dealt by the Board and the matters which can be delegated to committees with only material matters being placed before the Board.

This distinction would enable the Board to focus on its key areas of responsibility – risk and strategy governance and strengthens its powers of oversight over the risk management system, exposures to related entities and conformity with corporate governance standards[1].

Policy Matters

A list of policies which must be placed before the Board for its approval and which may be delegated for review are prescribed in Appendix-I of the Draft Directions. The Board is responsible for approving the policies at the time of framing and only periodical review is to be delegated to the committees. In case of any ‘material amendments’ (to be defined by the Board), the Board’s approval must be sought. Thus, the Board does not lose complete oversight.

Along with a major consolidating exercise, the Draft Directions also indicate policies where delegation is expressly allowed, even where the underlying directions/ guidelines did not expressly provide for the same. Accordingly, the amendments are enabling in nature in certain cases, as illustrated below:

ProvisionsContentsDelegation to
Para 7(3) and 7(4) of RBI (Commercial Banks – Undertaking of Financial Services) Directions, 2025Where the bank intends to function as a Professional Clearing Member in commodity derivatives, policy for-Specification of risk control measures and prudential norms for exposure limits for each trading member;Governing the bank’s exposure to trading members, ensuring consistency with the overall risk appetite and regulatory requirements.Risk Management Committee
Para 7(2) and 7(3) of the RBI (Commercial Banks – Miscellaneous) Directions, 2025Policy on- Courses / certifications required for specialised areas of operationsList of sensitive positions to be covered under mandatory leave requirementsAny Committee to which powers have been delegated by the Board.

Matters other than policy

Matters other than policies which must be placed before the Board for its approval, review or information are given in Appendix-II of Draft Directions. While several matters must be mandatorily taken up by the Board, the Board shall have the discretion to delegate certain matters even where the underlying directions/ guidelines did not expressly provide for the same. Accordingly, the amendments are enabling in nature in certain cases – for e.g. matters relating to risk assessment methodology for RBIA, Annual Audit Plan, analysis of incidents of operational risk failures & their impact to audit committee, matters relating to investment portfolio to risk management committee.

The Draft Directions also provide for discontinuation of about 6 matters at the discretion of the Board. In certain cases, such as ATM transactions including failed transactions and penalties paid, certain details are to be placed before the Board. The details must be forwarded to RBI along with the Board’s observations. The Draft Directions proposes that such review may be discontinued at the discretion of the Board. Accordingly, amendments would be required in the underlying laws as well.  Similarly in case of matters relating to loans to stockbrokers and market makers where the provisions mandate half-yearly review of the aggregate portfolio, its quality and performance by the Board, the board will have to exercise its discretion depending on the extent of exposure.

Proposed Omissions

Certain provisions of the existing Directions proposed to be omitted are as follows:

ParaProvision deals withVKC Remarks
14The Board should focus on the 7 themes of: Business Strategy, Risk, Financial Reports and their integrity, Compliance, Customer Protection, Financial Inclusion, Human ResourcesInstead of specifying the themes, the proposed amendment indicates that the ultimate responsibility for the bank’s performance, conduct and control rests with the Board and that it needs to ensure that sufficient time is dedicated to strategy and risk governance.
16Review of action taken on points arising from earlier meetings till the satisfaction of the boardBroader discretion provided to Banks to decide internal processes and articulate matters requiring its approval or to be brought for reporting or noting of information.
17Placing regulatory communication from RBI and the government along with supplementary information before the Board
18Delegation expressly permitted for: Reviews dealing with various performance areas and only a summary on each of the reviews may be put up to the Board at periodic intervals; Monitoring of the exposures (both credit and investment) of the bank; Review of the adequacy of the risk management process and upgradation thereof; Internal control system; Ensuring compliance with the statutory / regulatory framework, etc.A prescriptive list of permitted delegation has been specified by RBI, refer discussion below.
19Procedural technicalities relating to placing a summary of key observations by directors at the next board meeting and confirmation by directors for their observations, dissents etc. Broader discretion provided to Banks to decide internal processes.

Conclusion

The Draft Directions propose to optimise the time of the Board of Banks to focus on strategic and governance matters instead of operational matters. While this measure aims to boost the productivity of Banks and bring ease of doing business in the short term, once notified, several actionables would arise for Banks. Banks must examine their current decision making structure, at the level of the Board and delegation to committees, to understand how they would align it with the proposed amendments.


[1] Para 15 of the existing directions retained as para 11A of the Draft Directions.

Refer to our other resources:

  1. Representation for issues related to RBI (Commercial Banks – Credit Risk Management)(Amendment) Directions, 2026
  2. RBI Directions on Lending to Related Parties: Frequently Asked Questions
  3. Navigation Roadmap through New Consolidated RBI Directions – Presentation

RBI clarifications on computation of Tier 1 capital

– Siddharth Pandey, Assistant Manager | finserv@vinodkothari.com

Over time, RBI has received multiple representations from NBFCs seeking a review of the provisions and clarity on certain aspects for the computation of Owned Funds and Tier I capital. In response, RBI has reviewed the relevant directions and guidelines and has now proposed a set of clarifications and revisions aimed at aligning capital computation with the latest available financial position. 

RBI had issued Draft Amendment Directions vide its press release dated January 13, 2026, on ‘Clarification on Owned Fund / Tier 1 Capital computation for NBFCs / ARCs and applicability to “Credit / Investment Concentration” Norms’ proposing amendments to various relevant Master Directions. The said proposals have now been notified by the Reserve Bank of India through its press release dated March 10, 2026


Tier 1 is the core component of an NBFC’s regulatory capital. The same is arrived at by deducting exposure taken in group companies and other NBFCs (to the extent the same exceeds 10% of the owned funds) from the owned funds. NBFCs are required to maintain 15% of their risk-weighted assets as capital, in the form of Tier 1 and Tier 2, on an ongoing basis. In addition to maintaining the capital adequacy, Tier 1 capital also serves as an important benchmark to compute the maximum exposure an NBFC can take in a single borrower/group of borrowers. 

Analysis of the proposed changes

Owned Fund forms a key component of regulatory capital and includes free reserves, which, in simple terms, represent accumulated profits retained by an NBFC and available for unrestricted use. By including adjusted quarterly profits in the Owned Fund, NBFCs will be allowed to factor in profits earned during the current financial year without having to wait for completion of the year-end audit.

However, crucial points that comes to light on the reading of the above mentioned amendments are:

  1. Inclusion of quarterly profits has been specifically included in the computation of owned funds for the purpose of determining the capital adequacy. 
  2. Tier 1 capital for the purpose of concentration risk management is to be seen from the last available financial statements (audited or subject to limited review). Here, the definition of Tier 1 capital has to be referred from the capital adequacy directions; further, the same shall be based on the latest audited financial statements.

Accordingly, based on the above, it can be said that while determining Tier 1 capital for calculating the maximum exposure an NBFC can take, both adjusted quarterly profits as well as any capital raised during the year will be considered. However, for the purpose of capital adequacy, only adjusted quarterly profits have been included. There is no clarity being provided for the inclusion of capital raised during the quarter for capital adequacy computation. This creates a distinction between the two provisions with respect to the computation of Tier 1 capital. There is therefore a requirement to provide further clarity on the same since there seems to be no proper rationale for such divergence. 

It is also pertinent to note that the amendments are introduced in the definition of owned funds and thus affects the Tier 1 capital of an NBFC. However, the minimum net owned funds (NOF) that NBFCs are required to maintain is governed by section 45-IA(7)(i) of the RBI Act, 1934. These amendments therefore do not have any impact on the NOF computation. 

What was proposed and what has been notified?

While the final notification broadly retains the approach proposed in the draft amendment directions, RBI has also replaced the definitions of “Owned Fund” and “Tier 1 Capital” in the Concentration Risk Management Directions, 2025 by linking them directly to the definitions contained in the Prudential Norms on Capital Adequacy Directions, 2025

Further, an additional procedural requirement has been introduced for recognising capital augmentation while computing exposure limits. Specifically, the amended definition of Tier 1 capital provides that,

“2) Paragraph 4 (8) shall be replaced by:

“Tier 1 capital” shall have the same meaning as given in Chapter II of the Reserve Bank of India (Non-Banking Financial Companies – Prudential Norms on Capital Adequacy) Directions, 2025. However, for the purpose of concentration norms, the NBFC shall obtain an external auditor’s certificate on completion of the augmentation of capital and submit the same to the Department of Supervision of the RBI before reckoning the additions to capital funds.

This clarification further reinforces the distinction noted earlier in the draft amendments. Accordingly, even though an NBFC may raise fresh capital during the year (for instance, through issuance of shares or infusion of additional equity), such capital cannot immediately be used for expanding exposure limits under the concentration norms. Before counting the increased capital, the NBFC must:

  • Complete the capital augmentation process (actually receive the funds).
  • Obtain a certificate from its external auditor confirming that the capital increase has been completed.
  • Submit that certificate to the RBI’s Department of Supervision.

Only after abiding by this process can the NBFC include the additional capital in Tier 1 capital for calculating concentration limits.

Key Changes Notified

  1. Amendment to the computation of Owned Funds 

RBI vide amendment in the Prudential Norms on Capital Adequacy directions has allowed NBFCs to consider the quarterly profits as a part of the owned funds computation, subject to certain adjustments. 

Earlier, as per the RBI Circular dated April 19, 2022, RBI permitted the inclusion of current-year profits in CET 1 capital, which was applicable only to NBFCs classified in the Upper Layer. Thus, other NBFCs were not specifically allowed to consider such quarterly profits as a part of their owned funds. 

The inclusion of quarterly profits as a part of the owned funds and consequently in Tier 1 capital is subject to certain conditions (adjusted quarterly profits):

  • The quarterly financial statements are subjected to limited review by the statutory auditors, and
  • The profits included are reduced by the average dividend paid during the preceding three financial years.
  • Further, any losses incurred during the year should also be fully reduced from the owned funds. 

Illustration:

In a simple illustration, an NBFC-ML earns a profit of ₹ 4 crores up to Q3 of FY 25-26. Let’s assume the average dividend paid during the last three years is ₹3 crore per annum.

Position under the Existing Norms:

Only audited, year-end profits could be considered as a component of the Owned Fund for capital computation. Thus ₹4 crore profits earned during the current year (up to December 2025) could not be included in free reserves and consequently under Owned Funds.

Proposed amendment:

Under the draft amendment, adjusted quarterly profits are permitted to be included in free reserves and Owned Fund, computed as per the below formula:

EPt = NPt – 0.25 *D*tWhere:EPt = Eligible profit up to quarter ‘t’ of the current financial year, t varies from 1 to 4NPt = Net profit up to quarter ‘t’D = average dividend paid during the last three years

In our example,

NPt = ₹4 crores (profit up to Q3)

D = ₹3 crore (average dividend of last three years)

t = 3 (up to December)

EP = 4−(0.25×3×3) = 1.75

Hence, ₹1.75 crore can be taken as an eligible profit for capital computation. 

  1. Amendments to Tier I Capital for credit/investment concentration norms

To give effect to the proposed revisions in the computation of Tier 1 capital, consequential amendments have been done in the Master Direction – RBI (NBFC – Concentration Risk Management) Directions, 2025, vide the RBI (NBFC – Concentration Risk Management) Second Amendment Directions, 2026. These amendments modify the manner of determining Tier I capital solely for the purpose of credit and investment concentration norms. In this regard, the following insertion has been proposed:

“The applicable Tier 1 Capital for compliance with the norms stated in paragraphs 13 and 14 above, shall be determined based on the NBFC’s latest available financial statements (audited or subject to limited review).”

“Tier 1 Capital shall be as defined in paragraph 10 of the RBI (NBFC – Prudential Norms on Capital Adequacy) Directions, 2025.”

Our Resources:

  1. Like banks, NBFC-UL to maintain CET-1 capita
  2. Harmonising computation for concentration limits across NBFC
  3. Should OCI be included as a part of Tier I capital for financial institutions?