SEBI Circular | Operational guideline on Scheme of arrangement for entities having listed NCDs/ NCRPS

– Kaushal Shah, Executive | kaushal@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [311.76 KB]

Read our related resources on the recent 6th LODR amendments :

  1. SEBI rationalizes ID appointment and removal process for first term Re-appointment process to be rationalized post amendment in CA, 2013
  2. SEBI LODR amendments: Minority say in independent directors, added regulations for debt issuers
  3. SEBI notifies amendments in LODR for NCS entities Scheme of Arrangement | Submission of financial results & line items | Transfer to IPEF for unclaimed NCS amounts by body corporate

SEBI notifies amendments in LODR for NCS entities Scheme of Arrangement | Submission of financial results & line items | Transfer to IPEF for unclaimed NCS amounts by body corporate

Ajay Ramanathan, Executive |

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [110.75 KB]

Read our related resources :

  1. SEBI LODR amendments: Minority say in independent directors, added regulations for debt issuersSEBI rationalizes ID appointment and removal process for first term Re-appointment process to be rationalized post amendment in CA, 2013
  2. SEBI rationalizes ID appointment and removal process for first term Re-appointment process to be rationalized post amendment in CA, 2013

SEBI LODR amendments: Minority say in independent directors, added regulations for debt issuers

Pammy Jaiswal | Partner | Vinod Kothari and Company (pammy@vinodkothari.com)

Background

Following the various recommendations provided by the Primary market Advisory Committee (PMAC), SEBI in its board meeting held on 30th September, 2022 discussed several proposals including the agenda to review the process for independent directors’ (IDs) appointment, re-appointment or removal,  introducing the need to appoint a monitoring agency for overseeing the utilisation of the issues proceeds from the preferential issue and the qualified institutional placements (‘QIP’), requirement of obtaining NoC from SEBI for schemes of arrangement involving such companies which have listed their Non-Convertible Securities (‘NCS’) and several other changes dealing with disclosures and financial results for NCS listed entities. Our snippet covering the aforesaid board decisions may be viewed here.

These proposals have been notified, as the SEBI Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) (Sixth Amendment) Regulations, 2022 (LODR 6th Amendment Regulations) have come into effect vide Notification dated 14th November, 2022 (‘Effective Date’). Our snippet covering the amendments may be viewed here.

Read more

SEBI rationalizes ID appointment and removal process for first term Re-appointment process to be rationalized post amendment in CA, 2013

– Kaushal Shah, Executive | kaushal@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [175.01 KB]

Read our related resources :

  1. SEBI LODR amendments: Minority say in independent directors, added regulations for debt issuers
  2. SEBI notifies amendments in LODR for NCS entities Scheme of Arrangement | Submission of financial results & line items | Transfer to IPEF for unclaimed NCS amounts by body corporate

Getting material on “material” events and information

SEBI issues consultation paper on Reg. 30 of LODR Regulations 

[This version: 15th November, 2022]

The importance of transparency and timely dissemination of material information for a listed entity needs no emphasis, since these events and information have a direct bearing on the price discovery of the securities of the listed entities and the investors’ decisions. The intent of regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015 (“Listing Regulations”) is to ensure seamless flow of information; the Regulation is complemented by Schedule III thereto, which provides an indicative list of the events or information in a listed entity that may be considered “material” and thereby, requires prompt disclosure by way of intimations to the stock exchange(s) in which the entity is listed. 

While Para A of Part A of Schedule III specifies the list of information/ events which are “deemed” material, Para B specifies a list of information/ events which are to be tested based on application of guidelines of materiality. These guidelines of materiality are provided in sub-regulation (4) of Reg 30 and are determined on the basis of the policy for determination of materiality (“Materiality Policy”) of the listed entity. The Materiality Policy of a listed entity plays a prominent role in determining the disclosure practices of a listed entity.

The Consultation Paper, while removing discretion and the scope for non-quantitative tests for determining materiality, also seeks to make several other changes in the requirement for seamless disclosures. Notably, the Consultation Paper proposes a threshold of 2% of turnover, that too, standalone, for the listed entity, as the likely impact of the event or information, whereas, as per our study  “Corporate Governance & material price sensitive information: Need for listed entities to frame effective materiality policy”, most companies either did not have any quantifiable thresholds for determination of materiality, and where they did, the threshold was mostly 10% either on a standalone or on a consolidated basis.

If the proposals in the Consultation Paper are finally implemented, we feel that there will be a lot more events calling for Reg 30 disclosures. Currently, for many companies which have listed their specified securities, it is only the events listed in Para A of Part A of Schedule III which come for disclosure on the exchanges; the rest of the events or developments remain prone to subjectivity and therefore, indecision.

The Consultation Paper will remain open for comments till 27th November, 2022. We provide a gist of the key proposals in the Consultation Paper. 

Read more

Workshop on Structured Digital Database for Insider Trading: Preparing for the Compliance Certificate

In view of the overwhelming response received on our earlier session on the topic held on 9th November, 2022, we are announcing a repeat session on 15th November, 2022

Click here to register for the workshop – https://forms.gle/JgWXqp2JJUBX4wPm8
Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [473.13 KB]

Structured Digital Database under PIT Regulations: Preparing for the Compliance Certificate (Presentation)

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [952.45 KB]

SEBI further caps limit for ISINs to reduce fragmentation and boost liquidity

– Lovish Jain, Executive | lovish@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [78.62 KB]

RPT compliances by subsidiaries of listed entities (Presentation)

– Vinita Nair & Sikha Bansal | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

Loader Loading…
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab

Download as PDF [1.25 MB]

Our Related Party Transactions Resource Centre can be accessed here

Guide to Compliance Certificate for Structured Digital Database under PIT Regulations

– Vinod Kothari | corplaw@vinodkothari.com

The requirement of maintaining a structured digital database (SDD) arises from Reg 3 (5) of the PIT Regulations, 2015. The PIT Regulations itself does not talk about any compliance certificate as to maintenance of the SDD. However, the requirement of such a certificate emanates from the mails sent by national stock exchanges dated 4th August, 2022. 

The requirement of the certificate was made effective from Q1 of 2022-23; however, no format of the certificate was provided so far. Vide the BSE’s notice no. 20221028-15 and 20221028-16 dated 28th October, 2022, issued for equity and debt listed entities respectively, the stock exchange has provided the format of the certificate. The said letter also states that the compliance certificate may be given either by the compliance officer of the company, or by a practising company secretary.

In this write up, we have tried providing a basic guidance on the compliance certificate. While the article is primarily focused on certification by a practising professional, the approach may, with appropriate modifications, apply to certification by the compliance officer too.

Read more