Effectiveness of Appointed Date in a Scheme of Arrangement, by Vallari Dubey

Background

Every time a new Act is introduced, it brings with itself a fresh set of regulations. The Companies Act, 2013[1] (‘the Act’) is one astounding example of the same. What makes this Act stand out is the fact that it replaced decades old Companies Act, 1956. With the Act in force, several erstwhile concepts have been modified, replaced or even struck down; some new concepts have been drawn in with much emphasis on the peculiarity of present economic scenario in the country. Though, substantial portion of the Act has replaced the old version; some matters hold the same attributes, mutatis mutandis along with specific inclusions clarifying what was always assumed to subsist. One such matter pertains to the concept of ‘Appointed Date’ and ‘Effective Date’ in any Scheme of Arrangement vis. Scheme of Amalgamation/Merger/Demerger. Read more

Date extended again for transfer of shares to IEPF

The MCA has once again extended the time for transferring the shares to the IEPF demat account in view of the modality gap present. The circular clearly states that since the operational issues are yet to be finalized with the other participants, the date for transferring shares is being extended.

After number of circulars on trying to simplify the whole process of transfer of shares, it does not seem to actually simplify the task, moreover such extensions raise high doubts in the minds of the stakeholders on how realistic the transfer of shares would actually be.

The circular also states that all the corporates are advised to complete all the formalities in relation to transfer without waiting for any fresh dates. This implies that companies which have almost completed all the formalities on their part can without any doubt finish off the residual formalities like issuing duplicate share certificates and making entries in the register. Such extension surely does not provides the scope to the shareholders whose shares are to be transferred to have an extended time to come and claim dividend from the company beyond the time provided in the notices.

Further, for many companies time has come to give notice to the shareholders whose dividend is lying unclaimed from the financial year 2009-10. At such a stage when the first tranche of transfer has not been done, corporates wonder on how the upcoming events will turn out to be in connection with such transfer.

Link to the circular- http://www.mca.gov.in/Ministry/pdf/GeneralCircular6_29052017.pdf

 

Author:  Pammy Jaiswal

Associate

Vinod Kothari and Company

Majority Shareholders: New Dictators in a Democratic Institution by Parul Bansal

In this era, where the country is going through immense economic growth, more and more investors are coming up with the intention to invest in the equity of the companies. Such investments lead to acquisition of interest and rights by the investors in the company. Intention of every investor varies from each other. Where one invests with the intention to earn short term profit by trading in the securities of the company, the other may invest with an intention of long term investment and enjoying the dividend ownership and / or controlling rights over the company. While each and every investor does not participate into the everyday affairs of the business, however, with the level of transparency being visualised, each investor, especially, the long term investors surely have a crucial role to play in the company. Read more

Impact of winding up petitions on insolvency filings by Nitu Poddar

Can an Application for resolution process of a company be filed under IBC, 2016 in case a winding up Petition is pending before a High Court?

MCA Notification on transition for pending proceedings

MCA notification for Companies (Transfer of Pending Proceedings) Rules, 2016[1]  only provides for the transition of the litigation process from High Court to the NCLT.  This Rule lays down the criteria for deciding whether the matter will be filed with and adjudged by NCLT or by High Court.

As per the Rule 5 of the said Rules, where the Petition for winding up has been served on the Respondent Company and is pending before the respective High Court, such Petition shall be adjudged by the High Court.

When a matter is being adjudged by the High Court under Act, 1956, the same will be governed by the provisions of the erstwhile Act, 1956.

Read more

Get Set Go…. to transfer shares to IEPF! by Pammy Jaiswal

Introduction

MCA vide its notification dated 28th February, 2017 had tried to simplify the modus operandi for transferring shares to the IEPF Authority. In doing so, it had left various questions unanswered. For instance, Rule 6 of the Investor Education and Protection Fund Authority (Accounting, Audit, Transfer and Refund) Amendment Rules, 2017 (‘IEPF Amendment Rules’) stated that companies would be required to transfer the shares to the IEPF demat account. However, the same did not mentioned anything regarding the expected time frame by which such accounts would open or what would be the modalities of transfer at the depository level. As a result of which corporates kept wondering on the ways to effect the transfer of shares to the IEPF account.

Read more

Companies Act now permits cross border mergers by Meenakshi Lakshmanan

Cross border merger is not a novel concept in the corporate arena. This concept has taken shape stage by stage. The origin of the cross border merger started with the foreign trade which extended to branch establishments in the foreign territory and later merging with entities of the foreign country. When it comes it Indian scenario, the initial step towards cross border mergers was taken in 2005 by the JJ Irani committee. The need for widening the scope of business internationally and the necessity of ensuring compliance with law is a mammoth task for all the jurisdictions to balance.

Read more