ROLE OF ADJUDICATING AUTHORITY IN APPROVING/ REJECTING A RESOLUTION PLAN

By Richa Saraf and Ananya Raghavendra (resolution@vinodkothari.com)

The insolvency resolution process of Binani Cements have been through various ups- and downs. On 19.11.2018, the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Rajputana Properties Pvt. Ltd. v. UltraTech Cement Ltd. & Ors. dismissed Dalmia Bharat’s plea to seek stay on Ultratech’s bid for Binani Cement, upholding the UltraTech Cement’s bid for Binani Cement sale. Previously, on 14.11.2018, the NCLAT had also held UltraTech’s offer for Binani Cement as valid, stating that Dalmia Bharat’s offer was discriminatory against some creditors[1]. Read more

LIBERAL INTERPRETATION OF SECTION 8 AND 9(3)(C) OF THE IBC BY THE APEX COURT

By Vishal Hablani (resolution@vinodkothari.com) Read more

NO EMBARGO ON PROCEEDINGS IN FAVOUR OF CORPORATE DEBTOR U/S 14(1) OF THE CODE

-By Sikha Bansal & Vishal Hablani (resolution@vinodkothari.com) Read more

APPLICATION UNDER SARFAESI- A Liberal Approach by the Supreme Court

By Richa Saraf, (legal@vinodkothari.com) Read more

DECIPHERING “DISPUTE” IN INSOLVENCY AND BANKRUPTCY CODE

By Richa Saraf, (legal@vinodkothari.com)

-Mobilox Innovations Pvt. Ltd. v. Kirusa Software Pvt. Ltd.[1]

Read more

RESTRICTIVE REMEDY UNDER SECTION 14 OF SARFAESI ACT

By Richa Saraf , (legal@vinodkothari.com) Read more